Refining the optimal chemotherapy regimen for good-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors: a randomized trial of the Genito-Urinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (GETUG T93BP).

BACKGROUND High cure rates are expected in good-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor (NSGCT) patients with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received either three cycles of BE500P or four cycles of E500P every 3 weeks. Disease was defined according to the Institut Gustave Roussy prognostic model. Patients were retrospectively assigned into the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification. A sample size of 250 patients was necessary for an expected favorable response rate (primary end point) of 90% and not more than a 10% difference between the two arms. RESULTS Among 257 assessable patients, 124 and 122 patients achieved a favorable response in the 3BE500P and 4E500P arms, respectively (P = 0.34). Median follow-up was 53 months. The 4-year event-free survival rates were 91% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.135). The 4-year overall survival rates were not significantly different [five deaths versus 12 deaths, respectively (P = 0.096)]. Similar nonsignificant trends were observed in good IGCCCG prognosis patients. CONCLUSIONS Both regimens produced similar results in terms of favorable response rates. As the trial was underpowered for survival analyses, conclusive data would require a larger randomized trial. Unless such a study is done, 3BE500P is the treatment of choice for metastatic NSGCT patients.

[1]  Alan Horwich,et al.  Testicular germ-cell cancer , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Bacik,et al.  Etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic good-risk germ cell tumors. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  W. Siegert,et al.  European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  M. Stockler,et al.  Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[5]  S. Culine,et al.  Comparative Tolerability of Chemotherapy Regimens for Germ Cell Cancer , 2000, Drug safety.

[6]  L. Einhorn,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: the Indian University experience. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  L. Collette,et al.  Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular nonseminoma: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  S. Culine,et al.  Are 3 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin or 4 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin equivalent optimal regimens for patients with good risk metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis? The need for a randomized trial. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[9]  Richard Sylvester,et al.  International germ cell consensus classification: A prognostic factor-erased staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers , 1997 .

[10]  L. Einhorn,et al.  Importance of bleomycin in favorable-prognosis disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Kaye,et al.  The importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis germ cell carcinoma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  V. Harvey,et al.  The importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis germ cell carcinoma. Australasian Germ Cell Trial Group. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  L. Einhorn Treatment of testicular cancer: a new and improved model. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. McKeage,et al.  Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity is a poor predictor of clinically significant bleomycin lung. New Zealand Clinical Oncology Group. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  L. Einhorn,et al.  Evaluation of optimal duration of chemotherapy in favorable-prognosis disseminated germ cell tumors: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group protocol. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Geller,et al.  A randomized trial of etoposide + cisplatin versus vinblastine + bleomycin + cisplatin + cyclophosphamide + dactinomycin in patients with good-prognosis germ cell tumors. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Théodore,et al.  Prognostic factors in advanced nonseminomatous testicular cancer a multivariate logistic regression analysis , 1988, Cancer.

[18]  L. Einhorn,et al.  Treatment of disseminated germ-cell tumors with cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Satterfield,et al.  TREATMENT , 1924, California and western medicine.

[20]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.