Quality of Life Is Markedly Improved in Patients With Fecal Incontinence After Sacral Nerve Stimulation

Objective The aim of the present analysis was to report on the relationship between long-term improvement in quality of life (QOL) and fecal incontinence (FI) severity and long-term reduction in FI episodes after sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) or sacral neuromodulation. Methods Patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, and initially had more than 2 FI episodes per week, were offered SNS therapy. Patients with 50% or higher reduction in FI during a 2-week test period were implanted with a neurostimulator (InterStim; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn). Assessments were completed by patients at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant, and annually thereafter. The present report includes data from the 4-year postimplant follow-up. Results A total of 133 patients underwent test stimulation with a 90% success rate, and as a result, 120 (110 females) with a mean age of 60.5 years and a mean duration of FI of 6.8 years received long-term implantation. Of them, 78 patients completed all or part of the 4-year follow-up assessment. Fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a mean of 9.4 per week at baseline to 1.9 per week at 48 months (P < 0.001). The 4-year analyses showed that SNS had a positive and sustained impact on all 4 scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (P < 0.001), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores improved from a mean of 39.9 to 28 (P < 0.001), and self-rated bowel health scores improved from a mean of 3.5 to 6.9 (P < 0.001). Conclusions Sacral nerve stimulation not only restores or improves continence in treated patients with chronic FI but also improves their quality of life and symptom severity.

[1]  S. Wexner,et al.  Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[2]  C. Gómez,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. , 2011, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva.

[3]  P. Moayyedi,et al.  Meta‐analysis: factors affecting placebo response rate in the irritable bowel syndrome , 2010, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  S. Wexner,et al.  Infection Rates in a Large Investigational Trial of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence , 2010, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[5]  C. Ratto,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation Is a Valid Approach in Fecal Incontinence Due to Sphincter Lesions When Compared to Sphincter Repair , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  G. Duthie,et al.  Sacral Nerve Neuromodulation Is Effective Treatment for Fecal Incontinence in the Presence of a Sphincter Defect, Pudendal Neuropathy, or Previous Sphincter Repair , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  E. Weiss,et al.  Factors Associated with Failure of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter: A Study of Over 50 Cases from Cleveland Clinic Florida , 2009, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

[8]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[9]  L. Bartlett,et al.  Impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life. , 2009, World journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  N. Régenet,et al.  Value of sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: a comparison to the artificial bowel sphincter , 2009, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[11]  K. Matzel,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long‐term outcome , 2009, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[12]  A. Halverson,et al.  Ten-Year Outcome After Anal Sphincter Repair for Fecal Incontinence , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  R. Margreiter,et al.  Anal Submucosal Carbon Bead Injection for Treatment of Idiopathic Fecal Incontinence: A Preliminary Report , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[14]  C. Ratto,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  J. Tjandra,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence: External Anal Sphincter Defect vs. Intact Anal Sphincter , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  W. V. van Gemert,et al.  Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? , 2008, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[17]  D. Parés,et al.  Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10‐year cohort analysis , 2008, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[18]  J. Tjandra,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation is more Effective than Optimal Medical Therapy for Severe Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized, Controlled Study , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[19]  W. V. van Gemert,et al.  Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[20]  N. Demartines,et al.  Quality of life and morbidity after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[21]  N. Demartines,et al.  Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  L. Melton,et al.  Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence: A Population-based Study in Women , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[23]  A. Leroi,et al.  Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence: Results of a Multicenter Double-Blind Crossover Study , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[24]  M. Kamm,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in patients with previous partial spinal injury including disc prolapse , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  G. Duthie,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence , 2005, Digestive Surgery.

[26]  R. Allman,et al.  Prevalence and Correlates of Fecal Incontinence in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[27]  D. Margolin,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. , 2005, Clinics in colon and rectal surgery.

[28]  J. Tjandra,et al.  Injectable Silicone Biomaterial for Fecal Incontinence Caused by Internal Anal Sphincter Dysfunction Is Effective , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[29]  C. Dejong,et al.  Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Single-Center Study , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[30]  O. Rasmussen,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in a Patient With Muscular Dystrophy: Report of a Case , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[31]  M. Kamm,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[32]  F. Zerbib,et al.  Validation of the French version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life (FIQL) scale. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[33]  M. Kamm,et al.  Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study , 2004, The Lancet.

[34]  N. Norton The perspective of the patient. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[35]  P. Miner Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[36]  M. De Fazio,et al.  Permanent sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances , 2004, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[37]  J. Fleshman,et al.  The Safety and Efficacy of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter for Fecal Incontinence: Results from a Multicenter Cohort Study , 2002 .

[38]  R. Cohen,et al.  Medium‐term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[39]  A. Kroesen Importance of colonic transit evaluation in the management of fecal incontinence , 2002, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[40]  S. Wexner,et al.  Complications of Dynamic Graciloplasty: Incidence, Management, and Impact on Outcome , 2001 .

[41]  M. Lise,et al.  Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: Results in 40 patients , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[42]  Aeilko H. Zwinderman,et al.  What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[43]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Fecal incontinence quality of life scale , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[44]  James W. Fleshman,et al.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[45]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prevalence of Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Community‐Based Study , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[46]  M. Kamm,et al.  Laser Doppler measurement of rectal mucosal blood flow , 1999, Gut.

[47]  C. Vaizey,et al.  Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence , 1999, Gut.

[48]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[49]  S. Furner,et al.  Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[50]  Roberta L. Sangster,et al.  The Effect of Response Categories on Questionnaire Answers , 1997 .

[51]  Thomas T. Pace California Pacific Medical Center , 1992 .

[52]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  How trustworthy are bowel histories? Comparison of recalled and recorded information. , 1976, British medical journal.