Effects of ocean thermocline variability on noncoherent underwater acoustic communications.

The performance of acoustic modems in the ocean is strongly affected by the ocean environment. A storm can drive up the ambient noise levels, eliminate a thermocline by wind mixing, and whip up violent waves and thereby break up the acoustic mirror formed by the ocean surface. The combined effects of these and other processes on modem performance are not well understood. The authors have been conducting experiments to study these environmental effects on various modulation schemes. Here the focus is on the role of the thermocline on a widely used modulation scheme (frequency-shift keying). Using data from a recent experiment conducted in 100-m-deep water off the coast of Kauai, HI, frequency-shift-key modulation performance is shown to be strongly affected by diurnal cycles in the thermocline. There is dramatic variation in performance (measured by bit error rates) between receivers in the surface duct and receivers in the thermocline. To interpret the performance variations in a quantitative way, a precise metric is introduced based on a signal-to-interference-noise ratio that encompasses both the ambient noise and intersymbol interference. Further, it will be shown that differences in the fading statistics for receivers in and out of the thermocline explain the differences in modem performance.

[1]  L. Bjorno,et al.  A simulation tool for high data-rate acoustic communication in a shallow-water, time-varying channel , 1996 .

[2]  A.B. Baggeroer,et al.  The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  M. Porter,et al.  Gaussian beam tracing for computing ocean acoustic fields , 1987 .

[4]  Adam Zielinski,et al.  Performance analysis of digital acoustic communication in a shallow water channel , 1995, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Evolution of Seaweb underwater acoustic networking , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[6]  M. Siderius,et al.  Modeling techniques for marine-mammal risk assessment , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[7]  Paul Hursky,et al.  The Kauai Experiment , 2005 .

[8]  Paul Hursky,et al.  Telesonar Testbed Instrument Provides a Flexible Platform for Acoustic Propagation and Communication Research in the 8 – 50 kHz Band , 2005 .

[9]  J.E. Mazo,et al.  Digital communications , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  W. Hodgkiss,et al.  Effects of tidally driven temperature fluctuations on shallow-water acoustic communications at 18 kHz , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  M.B. Porter,et al.  SignalEx: linking environmental acoustics with the signaling schemes , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[12]  John G. Proakis Coded modulation for digital communications over Rayleigh fading channels , 1991 .

[13]  S. Nishifuji,et al.  On-line sensing system of dynamic ship’s attitude by use of servo-type accelerometers , 1995, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Michael B. Porter,et al.  Impact of Thermocline Variability on Underwater Acoustic Communications: Results from KauaiEx , 2005 .