Small-device users situationally impaired by input

Users of small computational devices, such as Mobile telephones or Personal Digital Assistants, are situationally impaired by both the device and the context of the device's use. This paper describes empirical work which makes the link between the behaviour of motor impaired desktop users and non-impaired users of small-devices. This is important because it may, therefore, be possible to leverage existing solutions for motor-impaired users into the small-device domain. We find that there is significant overlap in the extent of the problems encountered, but not the magnitude. Eight of the 11 existing errors made by motor-impaired users were also present in our small-device study in which two additional error types, key ambiguity and landing errors, were also observed. In addition, small-device rates for common error types were higher than those of desktop users with no impairment, but lower than those of desktop users with motor impairments. We suggest that this difference is because all users were seated to maintain constancy between studies and assert that this magnitude difference will equalise once the small-device is used in a mobile context.

[1]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods,Theory and Practice , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  The Future of Mobile Device Research in HCI , 2006 .

[3]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[4]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard , 1999, CHI '99.

[5]  Andrew Sears,et al.  How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Rainer Nordmann,et al.  How to operate a PC without using the hands , 2005, Assets '05.

[7]  Christina L. James,et al.  Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance , 2001, CHI.

[8]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones , 2000, CHI.

[9]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[10]  Vinay Avasthi,et al.  Position Paper – Mobile Internet UX for Developing Countries , 2007 .

[11]  J. Luo,et al.  Portable Computing in Psychiatry , 2004, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[12]  Shari Trewin,et al.  Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii,et al.  Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality , 2007 .

[14]  Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii,et al.  Text Entry Using a Small Number of Buttons , 2007 .

[15]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  An Evaluation of Mobile Phone Text Input Methods , 2002, AUIC.

[16]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Overcoming the Lack of Screen Space on Mobile Computers , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Shari Trewin Automating accessibility: the dynamic keyboard , 2003, Assets '04.

[18]  Shari Trewin,et al.  Physical usability and the mobile web , 2006, W4A '06.

[19]  Andriy Pavlovych,et al.  Model for non-expert text entry speed on 12-button phone keypads , 2004, CHI '04.

[20]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones , 2003, UIST '03.

[21]  Kent Lyons,et al.  Automatic whiteout++: correcting mini-QWERTY typing errors using keypress timing , 2008, CHI.

[22]  Andrew Sears,et al.  An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI , 2005, CHI.

[24]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Slipping and drifting: using older users to uncover pen-based target acquisition difficulties , 2007, Assets '07.

[25]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  Students' experiences with PDAs for reading course materials , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  TrueKeys: identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments , 2008, IUI '08.

[27]  Fred J. Damerau,et al.  A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors , 1964, CACM.

[28]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Wireless World – Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age, Barry Brown, Nicola Green and Richard Harper (eds.) , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  LetterWise: prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input , 2001, UIST '01.

[30]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Developing steady clicks:: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments , 2006, Assets '06.

[31]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Using pointing devices: quantifying differences across user groups , 2005 .

[32]  Melanie Baljko,et al.  Indirect text entry using one or two keys , 2006, Assets '06.

[33]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion , 2003, UIST '03.

[34]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens , 2007, Assets '07.

[35]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Knowing the User's Every Move – User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction , 2006 .

[36]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Exploring the relationship between mobile phone and document activity during business travel , 2001 .

[37]  Virpi Roto,et al.  How people use the web on mobile devices , 2008, WWW.

[38]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Physical disabilities and computing technologies: an analysis of impairments , 2002 .