'Who do you talk to about your teaching?': networking activities among university teachers

As the higher education environment changes, there are calls for university teachers to   change and enhance their teaching practices to match. Networking practices are known to be deeply implicated in studies of change and diffusion of innovation, yet academics’ networking activities in relation to teaching have been little studied. This paper extends the current limited understanding, building on Roxa and Martensson’s work (2009) and extending it from Sweden to the UK and USA.  It is based on three separate studies, two from the Share Project led by the University of Kent, and one from Glasgow Caledonian University and explores the composition of personal networks, and the characteristics of interactions in order to understand the networking practices which may support change of teaching practice. We conclude that academics’ personal teaching networks are mainly discipline-specific and strongly localised. This contrasts with the research networks found by Becher and Trowler (2001) and may reduce innovation, although about half the respondents also had external contacts that might support creativity.

[1]  A. Margaryan,et al.  Discovering academics' key learning connections: An ego-centric network approach to analysing learning about teaching , 2014 .

[2]  M. Segers,et al.  Understanding informal feedback seeking in the workplace: The impact of the position in the organizational hierarchy , 2013 .

[3]  M. Pinckaers,et al.  Social networks and organisations , 2012 .

[4]  K. Baker-Doyle.  The Networked Teacher: How New Teachers Build Social Networks for Professional Support (series on school reform) , 2011 .

[5]  Általános társadalom tudományok,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 2011 .

[6]  Sally Fincher,et al.  A Commons Leader's Vade Mecum , 2011 .

[7]  John Scott,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis , 2011 .

[8]  R. McCormick,et al.  Researching and Understanding Educational Networks , 2010 .

[9]  T. Roxå,et al.  Significant conversations and significant networks – exploring the backstage of the teaching arena , 2009 .

[10]  F. Dochy,et al.  Learning conditions for non‐formal and informal workplace learning , 2009 .

[11]  C. Coburn,et al.  District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks , 2008 .

[12]  Peter Aubusson,et al.  Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations , 2008 .

[13]  P. Knight.  Quality Enhancement and Educational Professional Development , 2006 .

[14]  Rob Koper,et al.  Effective Learning Networks , 2005 .

[15]  M. Eraut,et al.  Informal learning in the workplace , 2004 .

[16]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? , 2004 .

[17]  Sveinung Skule.  Learning Conditions at Work: A Framework to Understand and Assess Informal Learning in the Workplace , 2004 .

[18]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[19]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[20]  Sami Paavola,et al.  Epistemological foundations for CSCL: a comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities , 2002, CSCL.

[21]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[22]  B. Wellman.  Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[23]  B. Wellman.  Networks in the Global Village , 1998 .

[24]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[26]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[28]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  E. Babbie.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[30]  Laurent Filliettaz.  Asking questions… getting answers: A sociopragmatic approach to vocational training interaction , 2011 .

[31]  E. Wenger,et al.  Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[32]  Lorna Earl,et al.  Building and connecting learning communities : the power of networks for school improvement , 2009 .

[33]  P. Tynjälä.  Perspectives into learning at the workplace , 2008 .

[34]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[35]  A. Hargreaves.  Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity , 2003 .

[36]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[37]  M. Eraut.  Developing professional knowledge and competence , 1994 .