A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science

Many sectors, like finance, medicine, manufacturing, and education, use blockchain applications to profit from the unique bundle of characteristics of this technology. Blockchain technology (BT) promises benefits in trustability, collaboration, organization, identification, credibility, and transparency. In this paper, we conduct an analysis in which we show how open science can benefit from this technology and its properties. For this, we determined the requirements of an open science ecosystem and compared them with the characteristics of BT to prove that the technology suits as an infrastructure. We also review literature and promising blockchain-based projects for open science to describe the current research situation. To this end, we examine the projects in particular for their relevance and contribution to open science and categorize them afterwards according to their primary purpose. Several of them already provide functionalities that can have a positive impact on current research workflows. So, BT offers promising possibilities for its use in science, but why is it then not used on a large-scale in that area? To answer this question, we point out various shortcomings, challenges, unanswered questions, and research potentials that we found in the literature and identified during our analysis. These topics shall serve as starting points for future research to foster the BT for open science and beyond, especially in the long-term.

[1]  Andy Extance Could Bitcoin technology help science? , 2017, Nature.

[2]  H. Kakavand,et al.  The Blockchain Revolution: An Analysis of Regulation and Technology Related to Distributed Ledger Technologies , 2017 .

[3]  Marc Schiltz,et al.  Science without publication paywalls: cOAlition S for the realisation of full and immediate Open Access , 2018, PLoS biology.

[4]  Tariq Ahmad Shah,et al.  Open Access Journals in Library and Information Science: The Story so Far , 2012 .

[5]  Karl J. O'Dwyer,et al.  Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint , 2014 .

[6]  Richard Van Noorden,et al.  Metrics: A profusion of measures. , 2010, Nature.

[7]  Josep Lluis De La Rosa,et al.  A Survey of Blockchain Technologies for Open Innovation , 2019 .

[8]  Johan Almenberg,et al.  An Experiment on Prediction Markets in Science , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  E. Hand,et al.  Citizen science: People power , 2010, Nature.

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Brett Scott,et al.  How can cryptocurrency and blockchain technology play a role in building social and solidarity finance , 2016 .

[12]  M. Walport,et al.  Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data , 2011, The Lancet.

[13]  Jorge Luis Rodriguez,et al.  The Open Science Grid , 2005 .

[14]  Omar Sánchez,et al.  Smart Contract-Based Role Management on the Blockchain , 2018, BIS.

[15]  Michel Avital Peer Review: Toward a Blockchain-enabled Market-based Ecosystem , 2018, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  Metascience could rescue the ‘replication crisis’ , 2014, Nature.

[17]  Maxwell Ogden,et al.  Dat - Distributed Dataset Synchronization And Versioning , 2017 .

[18]  John P. Conley Blockchain and the Economics of Crypto-tokens and Initial Coin Offerings , 2017 .

[19]  Stuart Haber,et al.  Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping , 1993 .

[20]  D Kochalko,et al.  Applying Blockchain Solutions to Address Research Reproducibility and Enable Scientometric Analysis , 2018 .

[21]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  TrialChain: A Blockchain-Based Platform to Validate Data Integrity in Large, Biomedical Research Studies , 2018, ArXiv.

[22]  H. Pampel,et al.  Open Research Data: From Vision to Practice , 2014 .

[23]  Deepak Puthal,et al.  The Blockchain as a Decentralized Security Framework [Future Directions] , 2018, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.

[24]  David Metcalf,et al.  Blockchain in Science , 2017 .

[25]  Michèle B. Nuijten,et al.  Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  Fran Casino,et al.  A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues , 2019, Telematics Informatics.

[27]  Usman W. Chohan The Double Spending Problem and Cryptocurrencies , 2017 .

[28]  Adamantia Rachovitsa Blockchain for Open Science and Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .

[29]  Primavera De Filippi,et al.  Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology , 2016 .

[30]  A. Irwin The Politics of Talk , 2006 .

[31]  Sooyong Park,et al.  Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[32]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[33]  Jean-Maxime Rivière,et al.  Blockchain technology and IP – investigating benefits and acceptance in governments and legislations , 2018 .

[34]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.

[35]  D. Upton,et al.  Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts , 2016, F1000Research.

[36]  Kyungbaek Kim,et al.  A Survey about Consensus Algorithms Used in Blockchain , 2018, J. Inf. Process. Syst..

[37]  D. Cox,et al.  Statistical significance tests. , 1982, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[38]  Matthew Ponsford,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Bitcoin and Other Decentralised Virtual Currencies: Legal Regulation in the People's Republic of China, Canada, and the United States , 2015 .

[39]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  myExperiment: Defining the Social Virtual Research Environment , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.

[40]  K. Bhargavan,et al.  : Formal Verification of Smart Contracts , 2016 .

[41]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Open Data in Science , 2008 .

[42]  Johan A. Pouwelse,et al.  The Bittorrent P2P File-Sharing System: Measurements and Analysis , 2005, IPTPS.

[43]  Feng Tian,et al.  An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).

[44]  Primavera De Filippi,et al.  Blockchain-Based Crowdfunding: What Impact on Artistic Production and Art Consumption? , 2015 .

[45]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Breaking down the Blockchain Hype - towards a Blockchain Market Engineering Approach , 2017, ECIS.

[46]  Julian Cribb,et al.  Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century , 2010 .

[47]  Chris Dannen,et al.  Introducing Ethereum and Solidity , 2017 .

[48]  Gareth W. Peters,et al.  Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers Through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Transaction Processing and Smart Contracts on the Internet of Money , 2015, ArXiv.

[49]  Deepak Puthal,et al.  The Blockchain as a Decentralized Security Framework , 2018 .

[50]  E. Leahey,et al.  Collaborative Research in Sociology: Trends and Contributing Factors , 2008 .

[51]  R. Monfared,et al.  Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger , 2016 .

[52]  Oliver Tacke,et al.  Open Science 2.0: How Research and Education Can Benefit from Open Innovation and Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[53]  Atalay Mert Ileri,et al.  Realizing the potential of blockchain technologies in genomics , 2018, Genome research.

[54]  Eamon Duede,et al.  Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Michael Dansinger,et al.  Dear Plagiarist: A Letter to a Peer Reviewer Who Stole and Published Our Manuscript as His Own , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[56]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Blockchain and Initial Coin Offerings: Blockchain’s Implications for Crowdfunding , 2019, Business Transformation through Blockchain.

[57]  Eli Ben-Sasson,et al.  Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[58]  Abdullah Bjj,et al.  Altmetrics: the right step forward , 2012 .

[59]  Antonio A. Sánchez-Ruiz-Granados,et al.  Towards a Decentralized Process for Scientific Publication and Peer Review using Blockchain and IPFS , 2019, HICSS.

[60]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain Thinking : The Brain as a Decentralized Autonomous Corporation [Commentary] , 2015, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[61]  Richard Heller,et al.  Long-term overall survival from a phase I trial using intratumoral plasmid interleukin-12 with electroporation in patients with melanoma , 2015, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[62]  Richard Smith,et al.  Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006 .

[63]  Katrin Weller,et al.  Twitter for Scientific Communication: How Can Citations/References be Identified and Measured? , 2011 .

[64]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).

[65]  P. Ortolani Decentralized Autonomous Organizations , 2019 .

[66]  M. Morini From 'Blockchain Hype' to a Real Business Case for Financial Markets , 2016 .

[67]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey , 2018, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..

[68]  Ittai Abraham,et al.  The Blockchain Consensus Layer and BFT , 2017, Bull. EATCS.

[69]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  1 Blockchain's roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[70]  Paolo Tasca,et al.  Blockchain Technologies: The Foreseeable Impact on Society and Industry , 2017, Computer.

[71]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data , 2015, 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops.

[72]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[73]  Prateek Saxena,et al.  Making Smart Contracts Smarter , 2016, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..

[74]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Design Thinking using the Blockchain: Enable Traceability of Intellectual Property in Problem-Solving Processes for Open Innovation , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.

[75]  Michael Spearpoint,et al.  A Proposed Currency System for Academic Peer Review Payments Using the BlockChain Technology , 2017, Publ..

[76]  Megan Wacha Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability , 2018 .

[77]  Naoto Yanai,et al.  RBAC-SC: Role-Based Access Control Using Smart Contract , 2018, IEEE Access.

[78]  Gloria Origgi,et al.  Micro-credits in scientific publishing , 2011, J. Documentation.

[79]  William Mann,et al.  Digital Tokens and Platform Building , 2018 .

[80]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  On the prospects of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for open science and academic publishing , 2018, Semantic Web.

[81]  U. Dirnagl,et al.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014, The Lancet.

[82]  Ana Mlinarić,et al.  Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results , 2017, Biochemia medica.

[83]  Stephanie Alexander,et al.  Augur: a decentralized oracle and prediction market platform , 2015 .

[84]  Sascha Friesike,et al.  Towards Another Scientific Revolution , 2014 .

[85]  Varol Tepecik,et al.  Future of Democracy: Blockchain Voting , 2019 .

[86]  Paul Avery,et al.  A Science Driven Production Cyberinfrastructure—the Open Science Grid , 2011, Journal of Grid Computing.

[87]  Michael Fritz,et al.  Blockchain and smart contracts : Technologies, research issues and applications , 2018 .

[88]  A. Savelyev Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law , 2017 .

[89]  Sönke Bartling,et al.  Blockchain for Science and Knowledge Creation , 2018, Gesundheit digital.

[90]  Juan Pablo Alperin,et al.  Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.

[91]  Wattana Viriyasitavat,et al.  Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes , 2019, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[92]  Kevin Werbach,et al.  Trust, But Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law , 2017 .

[93]  Tom Crick,et al.  Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development , 2019 .

[94]  Advait Deshpande,et al.  Distributed Ledger Technologies/Blockchain , 2017 .

[95]  Jing Li,et al.  Blockchain Based Provenance Sharing of Scientific Workflows , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[96]  Jonathan P. Tennant,et al.  The state of the art in peer review , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.

[97]  Chris Dannen,et al.  Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners , 2017 .

[98]  Quoc Khanh Nguyen,et al.  Blockchain - A Financial Technology for Future Sustainable Development , 2016, 2016 3rd International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD).

[99]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Virtual Patent - Enabling the Traceability of Ideas Shared Online Using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping , 2017, ISI.

[100]  Emilio Tuosto,et al.  Validation of Decentralised Smart Contracts Through Game Theory and Formal Methods , 2015, Programming Languages with Applications to Biology and Security.

[101]  Horst Treiblmaier,et al.  Toward More Rigorous Blockchain Research: Recommendations for Writing Blockchain Case Studies , 2019, Front. Blockchain.

[102]  Joris van Rossum Blockchain for Research , 2017 .

[103]  M. Myllylahti,et al.  Newspaper Paywalls—the Hype and the Reality , 2014 .

[104]  C. Haeussler Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[105]  Iuon-Chang Lin,et al.  A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges , 2017, Int. J. Netw. Secur..

[106]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Securing Physical Assets on the Blockchain: Linking a novel Object Identification Concept with Distributed Ledgers , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.

[107]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[108]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  ProvChain: A Blockchain-Based Data Provenance Architecture in Cloud Environment with Enhanced Privacy and Availability , 2017, 2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID).

[109]  Abigail Salyers Science, Censorship, and Public Health , 2002, Science.

[110]  Anthony J. G. Hey,et al.  Jim Gray on eScience: a transformed scientific method , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[111]  Björn Scheuermann,et al.  Bitcoin and Beyond: A Technical Survey on Decentralized Digital Currencies , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[112]  Roland Bertelmann,et al.  Open Access: A State of the Art , 2014 .

[113]  David P. Centers,et al.  Blockchain and Its Coming Impact on Financial Services , 2016 .

[114]  C.H.J. Hartgerink,et al.  Verified, Shared, Modular, and Provenance Based Research Communication with the Dat Protocol , 2019, Publ..

[115]  Angelos Stavrou,et al.  Advancing open science with version control and blockchains , 2017 .

[116]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Securing Video Integrity Using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping on the Bitcoin Blockchain , 2016, MCIS.

[117]  M. Nentwich Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet , 2003 .

[118]  Michael Devetsikiotis,et al.  Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Access.

[119]  Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang Using Blockchain for Scientific Transparency , 2017 .

[120]  Trisha Gura,et al.  Citizen science: Amateur experts , 2013, Nature.

[121]  Nikhil Swamy,et al.  Formal Verification of Smart Contracts: Short Paper , 2016, PLAS@CCS.

[122]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy , 2015 .

[123]  F. Marincola,et al.  Supporting the advancement of science: Open access publishing and the role of mandates , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[124]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” , 2016, Science.

[125]  F. Prinz,et al.  Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[126]  Michael W. Carroll Why Full Open Access Matters , 2011, PLoS biology.

[127]  Hubert Ritzdorf,et al.  On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains , 2016, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..

[128]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[129]  Chris Woolston,et al.  Recognition: Build a reputation , 2015, Nature.

[130]  Erin C McKiernan,et al.  Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.

[131]  Juri Mattila,et al.  The Blockchain Phenomenon – The Disruptive Potential of Distributed Consensus Architectures , 2016 .

[132]  Olgica Nedic,et al.  Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author's Perspective , 2018, Publ..

[133]  Massimo Bartoletti,et al.  A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK) , 2017, POST.

[134]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Smart Papers: Dynamic Publications on the Blockchain , 2018, ESWC.

[135]  Marco Dell’Erba,et al.  Demystifying Technology. Do Smart Contracts Require a New Legal Framework? Regulatory Fragmentation, Self-Regulation, Public Regulation , 2018 .

[136]  Jöran Beel,et al.  CryptSubmit: Introducing Securely Timestamped Manuscript Submission and Peer Review Feedback Using the Blockchain , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL).

[137]  Gönenç Gürkaynak,et al.  Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm , 2018, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[138]  H. Pashler,et al.  Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[139]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Scientific Utopia , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[140]  Bitcoin will bite the dust. , 2015 .

[141]  Marko Vukolic,et al.  Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains , 2018, EuroSys.

[142]  Norman Meuschke,et al.  Decentralized Trusted Timestamping using the Crypto Currency Bitcoin , 2015, ArXiv.

[143]  Maria Powell,et al.  Participatory Paradoxes , 2009 .

[144]  Nicole A. Vasilevsky,et al.  On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature , 2013, PeerJ.

[145]  Daniele Fanelli,et al.  Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[146]  Jennifer C Molloy,et al.  The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science , 2011, PLoS biology.

[147]  Cesare Pautasso,et al.  The Blockchain as a Software Connector , 2016, 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA).

[148]  Roman Beck,et al.  Blockchain - the Gateway to Trust-Free Cryptographic Transactions , 2016, ECIS.

[149]  Joris van Rossum,et al.  The blockchain and its potential for science and academic publishing , 2018, Inf. Serv. Use.

[150]  Jack Peterson,et al.  Augur: a decentralized, open-source platform for prediction markets , 2015, ArXiv.

[151]  T. Vision Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing , 2010 .

[152]  Philip F Stahel,et al.  Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system , 2014, BMC Medicine.

[153]  Stuart Haber,et al.  How to time-stamp a digital document , 1990, Journal of Cryptology.

[154]  Natalie Matosin,et al.  Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture , 2014, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[155]  Sunny King,et al.  PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake , 2012 .

[156]  J. Gans,et al.  Some simple economics of the blockchain , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[157]  Allan Third,et al.  Peer-reviews on the blockchain , 2018 .

[158]  Raymond A. Patterson,et al.  Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia , 2006 .

[159]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  KARMA : A Secure Economic Framework for Peer-to-Peer Resource Sharing , 2003 .

[160]  Christina K. Pikas,et al.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.

[161]  Christina L. Catlin-Groves The Citizen Science Landscape: From Volunteers to Citizen Sensors and Beyond , 2012 .

[162]  Melanie Dulong de Rosnay Creative Commons: Open Content Licenses to Govern Creative Works , 2006 .

[163]  Juan Benet,et al.  IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System , 2014, ArXiv.

[164]  Federico Matteo Benvci'c,et al.  Distributed Ledger Technology: Blockchain Compared to Directed Acyclic Graph , 2018 .

[165]  Aloys Mvuma,et al.  Design of Land Administration and Title Registration Model Based on Blockchain Technology , 2017 .

[166]  Jasni Mohamad Zain,et al.  Reversible Region of Non-Interest (RONI) Watermarking for Authentication of DICOM Images , 2011, ArXiv.

[167]  Trang H Phan,et al.  Bacterial secretion chaperones: the mycobacterial type VII case , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.

[168]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Overview of Licensing Platforms based on Distributed Ledger Technology , 2019, HICSS.

[169]  Cesare Furlanello,et al.  Towards a scientific blockchain framework for reproducible data analysis , 2017, ArXiv.

[170]  Asress Adimi Gikay Regulating Decentralized Cryptocurrencies Under Payment Services Law: Lessons from European Union Law , 2018 .

[171]  Moritz Schubotz,et al.  Securing the Integrity of Time Series Data in Open Science Projects using Blockchain-based Trusted Timestamping , 2019 .

[172]  Benedikt Fecher,et al.  Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought , 2013 .

[173]  Anirban Basu,et al.  On blockchain-based anonymized dataset distribution platform , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA).

[174]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality , 2017, Trials.