A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
Moritz Schubotz | Bela Gipp | Stephan Leible | Steffen Schlager | Bela Gipp | S. Schlager | M. Schubotz | S. Leible | Steffen Schlager
[1] Andy Extance. Could Bitcoin technology help science? , 2017, Nature.
[2] H. Kakavand,et al. The Blockchain Revolution: An Analysis of Regulation and Technology Related to Distributed Ledger Technologies , 2017 .
[3] Marc Schiltz,et al. Science without publication paywalls: cOAlition S for the realisation of full and immediate Open Access , 2018, PLoS biology.
[4] Tariq Ahmad Shah,et al. Open Access Journals in Library and Information Science: The Story so Far , 2012 .
[5] Karl J. O'Dwyer,et al. Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint , 2014 .
[6] Richard Van Noorden,et al. Metrics: A profusion of measures. , 2010, Nature.
[7] Josep Lluis De La Rosa,et al. A Survey of Blockchain Technologies for Open Innovation , 2019 .
[8] Johan Almenberg,et al. An Experiment on Prediction Markets in Science , 2009, PloS one.
[9] E. Hand,et al. Citizen science: People power , 2010, Nature.
[10] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] Brett Scott,et al. How can cryptocurrency and blockchain technology play a role in building social and solidarity finance , 2016 .
[12] M. Walport,et al. Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data , 2011, The Lancet.
[13] Jorge Luis Rodriguez,et al. The Open Science Grid , 2005 .
[14] Omar Sánchez,et al. Smart Contract-Based Role Management on the Blockchain , 2018, BIS.
[15] Michel Avital. Peer Review: Toward a Blockchain-enabled Market-based Ecosystem , 2018, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[16] Jonathan W. Schooler,et al. Metascience could rescue the ‘replication crisis’ , 2014, Nature.
[17] Maxwell Ogden,et al. Dat - Distributed Dataset Synchronization And Versioning , 2017 .
[18] John P. Conley. Blockchain and the Economics of Crypto-tokens and Initial Coin Offerings , 2017 .
[19] Stuart Haber,et al. Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping , 1993 .
[20] D Kochalko,et al. Applying Blockchain Solutions to Address Research Reproducibility and Enable Scientometric Analysis , 2018 .
[21] Harlan M. Krumholz,et al. TrialChain: A Blockchain-Based Platform to Validate Data Integrity in Large, Biomedical Research Studies , 2018, ArXiv.
[22] H. Pampel,et al. Open Research Data: From Vision to Practice , 2014 .
[23] Deepak Puthal,et al. The Blockchain as a Decentralized Security Framework [Future Directions] , 2018, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.
[24] David Metcalf,et al. Blockchain in Science , 2017 .
[25] Michèle B. Nuijten,et al. Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results , 2014, PloS one.
[26] Fran Casino,et al. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues , 2019, Telematics Informatics.
[27] Usman W. Chohan. The Double Spending Problem and Cryptocurrencies , 2017 .
[28] Adamantia Rachovitsa. Blockchain for Open Science and Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .
[29] Primavera De Filippi,et al. Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology , 2016 .
[30] A. Irwin. The Politics of Talk , 2006 .
[31] Sooyong Park,et al. Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.
[32] F. Collins,et al. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.
[33] Jean-Maxime Rivière,et al. Blockchain technology and IP – investigating benefits and acceptance in governments and legislations , 2018 .
[34] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.
[35] D. Upton,et al. Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts , 2016, F1000Research.
[36] Kyungbaek Kim,et al. A Survey about Consensus Algorithms Used in Blockchain , 2018, J. Inf. Process. Syst..
[37] D. Cox,et al. Statistical significance tests. , 1982, British journal of clinical pharmacology.
[38] Matthew Ponsford,et al. A Comparative Analysis of Bitcoin and Other Decentralised Virtual Currencies: Legal Regulation in the People's Republic of China, Canada, and the United States , 2015 .
[39] Carole A. Goble,et al. myExperiment: Defining the Social Virtual Research Environment , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.
[40] K. Bhargavan,et al. : Formal Verification of Smart Contracts , 2016 .
[41] Peter Murray-Rust,et al. Open Data in Science , 2008 .
[42] Johan A. Pouwelse,et al. The Bittorrent P2P File-Sharing System: Measurements and Analysis , 2005, IPTPS.
[43] Feng Tian,et al. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).
[44] Primavera De Filippi,et al. Blockchain-Based Crowdfunding: What Impact on Artistic Production and Art Consumption? , 2015 .
[45] Christof Weinhardt,et al. Breaking down the Blockchain Hype - towards a Blockchain Market Engineering Approach , 2017, ECIS.
[46] Julian Cribb,et al. Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century , 2010 .
[47] Chris Dannen,et al. Introducing Ethereum and Solidity , 2017 .
[48] Gareth W. Peters,et al. Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers Through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Transaction Processing and Smart Contracts on the Internet of Money , 2015, ArXiv.
[49] Deepak Puthal,et al. The Blockchain as a Decentralized Security Framework , 2018 .
[50] E. Leahey,et al. Collaborative Research in Sociology: Trends and Contributing Factors , 2008 .
[51] R. Monfared,et al. Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger , 2016 .
[52] Oliver Tacke,et al. Open Science 2.0: How Research and Education Can Benefit from Open Innovation and Web 2.0 , 2010 .
[53] Atalay Mert Ileri,et al. Realizing the potential of blockchain technologies in genomics , 2018, Genome research.
[54] Eamon Duede,et al. Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[55] Michael Dansinger,et al. Dear Plagiarist: A Letter to a Peer Reviewer Who Stole and Published Our Manuscript as His Own , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[56] Nils Urbach,et al. Blockchain and Initial Coin Offerings: Blockchain’s Implications for Crowdfunding , 2019, Business Transformation through Blockchain.
[57] Eli Ben-Sasson,et al. Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[58] Abdullah Bjj,et al. Altmetrics: the right step forward , 2012 .
[59] Antonio A. Sánchez-Ruiz-Granados,et al. Towards a Decentralized Process for Scientific Publication and Peer Review using Blockchain and IPFS , 2019, HICSS.
[60] Melanie Swan,et al. Blockchain Thinking : The Brain as a Decentralized Autonomous Corporation [Commentary] , 2015, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..
[61] Richard Heller,et al. Long-term overall survival from a phase I trial using intratumoral plasmid interleukin-12 with electroporation in patients with melanoma , 2015, Journal of Translational Medicine.
[62] Richard Smith,et al. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006 .
[63] Katrin Weller,et al. Twitter for Scientific Communication: How Can Citations/References be Identified and Measured? , 2011 .
[64] Zibin Zheng,et al. An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).
[65] P. Ortolani. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations , 2019 .
[66] M. Morini. From 'Blockchain Hype' to a Real Business Case for Financial Markets , 2016 .
[67] Zibin Zheng,et al. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey , 2018, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..
[68] Ittai Abraham,et al. The Blockchain Consensus Layer and BFT , 2017, Bull. EATCS.
[69] Nir Kshetri,et al. 1 Blockchain's roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..
[70] Paolo Tasca,et al. Blockchain Technologies: The Foreseeable Impact on Society and Industry , 2017, Computer.
[71] Alex Pentland,et al. Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data , 2015, 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops.
[72] Elaine Shi,et al. Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).
[73] Prateek Saxena,et al. Making Smart Contracts Smarter , 2016, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..
[74] Bela Gipp,et al. Design Thinking using the Blockchain: Enable Traceability of Intellectual Property in Problem-Solving Processes for Open Innovation , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.
[75] Michael Spearpoint,et al. A Proposed Currency System for Academic Peer Review Payments Using the BlockChain Technology , 2017, Publ..
[76] Megan Wacha. Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability , 2018 .
[77] Naoto Yanai,et al. RBAC-SC: Role-Based Access Control Using Smart Contract , 2018, IEEE Access.
[78] Gloria Origgi,et al. Micro-credits in scientific publishing , 2011, J. Documentation.
[79] William Mann,et al. Digital Tokens and Platform Building , 2018 .
[80] Krzysztof Janowicz,et al. On the prospects of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for open science and academic publishing , 2018, Semantic Web.
[81] U. Dirnagl,et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014, The Lancet.
[82] Ana Mlinarić,et al. Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results , 2017, Biochemia medica.
[83] Stephanie Alexander,et al. Augur: a decentralized oracle and prediction market platform , 2015 .
[84] Sascha Friesike,et al. Towards Another Scientific Revolution , 2014 .
[85] Varol Tepecik,et al. Future of Democracy: Blockchain Voting , 2019 .
[86] Paul Avery,et al. A Science Driven Production Cyberinfrastructure—the Open Science Grid , 2011, Journal of Grid Computing.
[87] Michael Fritz,et al. Blockchain and smart contracts : Technologies, research issues and applications , 2018 .
[88] A. Savelyev. Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law , 2017 .
[89] Sönke Bartling,et al. Blockchain for Science and Knowledge Creation , 2018, Gesundheit digital.
[90] Juan Pablo Alperin,et al. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.
[91] Wattana Viriyasitavat,et al. Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes , 2019, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..
[92] Kevin Werbach,et al. Trust, But Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law , 2017 .
[93] Tom Crick,et al. Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development , 2019 .
[94] Advait Deshpande,et al. Distributed Ledger Technologies/Blockchain , 2017 .
[95] Jing Li,et al. Blockchain Based Provenance Sharing of Scientific Workflows , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).
[96] Jonathan P. Tennant,et al. The state of the art in peer review , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.
[97] Chris Dannen,et al. Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners , 2017 .
[98] Quoc Khanh Nguyen,et al. Blockchain - A Financial Technology for Future Sustainable Development , 2016, 2016 3rd International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD).
[99] Bela Gipp,et al. Virtual Patent - Enabling the Traceability of Ideas Shared Online Using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping , 2017, ISI.
[100] Emilio Tuosto,et al. Validation of Decentralised Smart Contracts Through Game Theory and Formal Methods , 2015, Programming Languages with Applications to Biology and Security.
[101] Horst Treiblmaier,et al. Toward More Rigorous Blockchain Research: Recommendations for Writing Blockchain Case Studies , 2019, Front. Blockchain.
[102] Joris van Rossum. Blockchain for Research , 2017 .
[103] M. Myllylahti,et al. Newspaper Paywalls—the Hype and the Reality , 2014 .
[104] C. Haeussler. Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .
[105] Iuon-Chang Lin,et al. A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges , 2017, Int. J. Netw. Secur..
[106] Bela Gipp,et al. Securing Physical Assets on the Blockchain: Linking a novel Object Identification Concept with Distributed Ledgers , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.
[107] M. Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.
[108] Sachin Shetty,et al. ProvChain: A Blockchain-Based Data Provenance Architecture in Cloud Environment with Enhanced Privacy and Availability , 2017, 2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID).
[109] Abigail Salyers. Science, Censorship, and Public Health , 2002, Science.
[110] Anthony J. G. Hey,et al. Jim Gray on eScience: a transformed scientific method , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.
[111] Björn Scheuermann,et al. Bitcoin and Beyond: A Technical Survey on Decentralized Digital Currencies , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[112] Roland Bertelmann,et al. Open Access: A State of the Art , 2014 .
[113] David P. Centers,et al. Blockchain and Its Coming Impact on Financial Services , 2016 .
[114] C.H.J. Hartgerink,et al. Verified, Shared, Modular, and Provenance Based Research Communication with the Dat Protocol , 2019, Publ..
[115] Angelos Stavrou,et al. Advancing open science with version control and blockchains , 2017 .
[116] Bela Gipp,et al. Securing Video Integrity Using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping on the Bitcoin Blockchain , 2016, MCIS.
[117] M. Nentwich. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet , 2003 .
[118] Michael Devetsikiotis,et al. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Access.
[119] Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang. Using Blockchain for Scientific Transparency , 2017 .
[120] Trisha Gura,et al. Citizen science: Amateur experts , 2013, Nature.
[121] Nikhil Swamy,et al. Formal Verification of Smart Contracts: Short Paper , 2016, PLAS@CCS.
[122] Melanie Swan,et al. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy , 2015 .
[123] F. Marincola,et al. Supporting the advancement of science: Open access publishing and the role of mandates , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.
[124] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” , 2016, Science.
[125] F. Prinz,et al. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[126] Michael W. Carroll. Why Full Open Access Matters , 2011, PLoS biology.
[127] Hubert Ritzdorf,et al. On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains , 2016, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..
[128] S. Hilgartner,et al. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.
[129] Chris Woolston,et al. Recognition: Build a reputation , 2015, Nature.
[130] Erin C McKiernan,et al. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.
[131] Juri Mattila,et al. The Blockchain Phenomenon – The Disruptive Potential of Distributed Consensus Architectures , 2016 .
[132] Olgica Nedic,et al. Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author's Perspective , 2018, Publ..
[133] Massimo Bartoletti,et al. A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK) , 2017, POST.
[134] Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al. Smart Papers: Dynamic Publications on the Blockchain , 2018, ESWC.
[135] Marco Dell’Erba,et al. Demystifying Technology. Do Smart Contracts Require a New Legal Framework? Regulatory Fragmentation, Self-Regulation, Public Regulation , 2018 .
[136] Jöran Beel,et al. CryptSubmit: Introducing Securely Timestamped Manuscript Submission and Peer Review Feedback Using the Blockchain , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL).
[137] Gönenç Gürkaynak,et al. Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm , 2018, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..
[138] H. Pashler,et al. Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[139] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Scientific Utopia , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[140] Bitcoin will bite the dust. , 2015 .
[141] Marko Vukolic,et al. Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains , 2018, EuroSys.
[142] Norman Meuschke,et al. Decentralized Trusted Timestamping using the Crypto Currency Bitcoin , 2015, ArXiv.
[143] Maria Powell,et al. Participatory Paradoxes , 2009 .
[144] Nicole A. Vasilevsky,et al. On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature , 2013, PeerJ.
[145] Daniele Fanelli,et al. Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[146] Jennifer C Molloy,et al. The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science , 2011, PLoS biology.
[147] Cesare Pautasso,et al. The Blockchain as a Software Connector , 2016, 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA).
[148] Roman Beck,et al. Blockchain - the Gateway to Trust-Free Cryptographic Transactions , 2016, ECIS.
[149] Joris van Rossum,et al. The blockchain and its potential for science and academic publishing , 2018, Inf. Serv. Use.
[150] Jack Peterson,et al. Augur: a decentralized, open-source platform for prediction markets , 2015, ArXiv.
[151] T. Vision. Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing , 2010 .
[152] Philip F Stahel,et al. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system , 2014, BMC Medicine.
[153] Stuart Haber,et al. How to time-stamp a digital document , 1990, Journal of Cryptology.
[154] Natalie Matosin,et al. Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture , 2014, Disease Models & Mechanisms.
[155] Sunny King,et al. PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake , 2012 .
[156] J. Gans,et al. Some simple economics of the blockchain , 2016, Commun. ACM.
[157] Allan Third,et al. Peer-reviews on the blockchain , 2018 .
[158] Raymond A. Patterson,et al. Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia , 2006 .
[159] Emin Gün Sirer,et al. KARMA : A Secure Economic Framework for Peer-to-Peer Resource Sharing , 2003 .
[160] Christina K. Pikas,et al. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.
[161] Christina L. Catlin-Groves. The Citizen Science Landscape: From Volunteers to Citizen Sensors and Beyond , 2012 .
[162] Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Creative Commons: Open Content Licenses to Govern Creative Works , 2006 .
[163] Juan Benet,et al. IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System , 2014, ArXiv.
[164] Federico Matteo Benvci'c,et al. Distributed Ledger Technology: Blockchain Compared to Directed Acyclic Graph , 2018 .
[165] Aloys Mvuma,et al. Design of Land Administration and Title Registration Model Based on Blockchain Technology , 2017 .
[166] Jasni Mohamad Zain,et al. Reversible Region of Non-Interest (RONI) Watermarking for Authentication of DICOM Images , 2011, ArXiv.
[167] Trang H Phan,et al. Bacterial secretion chaperones: the mycobacterial type VII case , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.
[168] Bela Gipp,et al. Overview of Licensing Platforms based on Distributed Ledger Technology , 2019, HICSS.
[169] Cesare Furlanello,et al. Towards a scientific blockchain framework for reproducible data analysis , 2017, ArXiv.
[170] Asress Adimi Gikay. Regulating Decentralized Cryptocurrencies Under Payment Services Law: Lessons from European Union Law , 2018 .
[171] Moritz Schubotz,et al. Securing the Integrity of Time Series Data in Open Science Projects using Blockchain-based Trusted Timestamping , 2019 .
[172] Benedikt Fecher,et al. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought , 2013 .
[173] Anirban Basu,et al. On blockchain-based anonymized dataset distribution platform , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA).
[174] Philippe Ravaud,et al. Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality , 2017, Trials.