Modeling of Ligand-Receptor Protein Interaction in Biodegradable Spherical Bounded Biological Micro-Environments

In this paper, we propose a generalized model for the Ligand-Receptor protein interaction in 3-D spherically bounded, diffusive biological microenvironments using molecular communication paradigm. Modeling a targeted cell as a receiver nano-machine, we derive analytical expressions for the Green’s function as well as for the expected number of the activated receptors. The molecular degradation in the environment due to enzymatic effects and the changes in pH levels are included via the first-order degradation reaction mechanism. A second-order reversible reaction mechanism is employed to model the reception process that involve the reaction of ligands to activate the receptor proteins lying on the receiver surface to form ligand-receptor complexes. We also present a particle-based simulator that incorporates the reversible reaction of molecules with the receptors present on the surface of a receiver that is located inside a bounded, 3-D microfluidic environment. Our simulations also include molecular degradation and boundary absorption of the ligands due to collision. The simulation results show perfect agreement with the results obtained from the analytical, bounded, and 3-D spherical model of the medium. The proposed models can be used for accurate prediction of the drug concentration profiles and number of activated receptors at any targeted cell.

[1]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Effect of Receptor Density and Size on Signal Reception in Molecular Communication via Diffusion With an Absorbing Receiver , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A Molecular Communication System Model for Particulate Drug Delivery Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Impact of Receiver Reaction Mechanisms on the Performance of Molecular Communication Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[4]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  A new frontier of wireless communication theory: diffusion-based molecular communications , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Energy model for communication via diffusion in nanonetworks , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[7]  N. Farsad,et al.  On-Chip Molecular Communication: Analysis and Design , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[8]  Adam Noel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Molecular Communication Systems With a Reversible Adsorption Receiver , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[9]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Extended Master Equation Models for Molecular Communication Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[10]  Jyothi U. Menon,et al.  Dual-Drug Containing Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Lung Cancer Therapy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  R M Phillips,et al.  Mathematical and computational models of drug transport in tumours , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Lectures in Theoretical Biophysics , 2015 .

[13]  Dogu Arifler,et al.  Deterministic Model for Pulse Amplification in Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Effect of Degradation in Molecular Communication: Impairment or Enhancement? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[15]  Satoshi Hiyama,et al.  Molecular communication: Harnessing biochemical materials to engineer biomimetic communication systems , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[16]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications , 2012, 2010 International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT).

[17]  Reinhold Förster,et al.  CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells , 1998, Nature.

[18]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Receiver Design for Molecular Communication , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  G. Pontrelli,et al.  A general model of coupled drug release and tissue absorption for drug delivery devices. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[20]  Robert Schober,et al.  Optimal Receiver Design for Diffusive Molecular Communication With Flow and Additive Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[21]  Dimitrios Makrakis,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Sampling-Based Optimum Signal Detection in Concentration-Encoded Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[22]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  Molecular Communication Modeling of Antibody-Mediated Drug Delivery Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Matthew D. Higgins,et al.  Relay Analysis in Molecular Communications With Time-Dependent Concentration , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[24]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  Molecular MIMO: From Theory to Prototype , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A Statistical–Physical Model of Interference in Diffusion-Based Molecular Nanonetworks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[26]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[27]  Beatrice Perissutti,et al.  A physiologically-oriented mathematical model for the description of in vivo drug release and absorption , 2014 .

[28]  Robert Schober,et al.  Comprehensive Reactive Receiver Modeling for Diffusive Molecular Communication Systems: Reversible Binding, Molecule Degradation, and Finite Number of Receptors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[29]  Adnan Aijaz,et al.  Error Performance of Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Using Pulse-Based Modulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[30]  Bruce Alberts,et al.  Essential Cell Biology , 1983 .

[31]  E. Edelman,et al.  Drug clearance and arterial uptake after local perivascular delivery to the rat carotid artery. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Kaihsu Tai,et al.  Finite element simulations of acetylcholine diffusion in neuromuscular junctions. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Channel Characteristics for Molecular Communications With an Absorbing Receiver , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[34]  Mauro Femminella,et al.  Modeling CD40-Based Molecular Communications in Blood Vessels , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[35]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Entrainment of a Population of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators , 2011, Science.

[36]  S. Andrews Accurate particle-based simulation of adsorption, desorption and partial transmission , 2009, Physical biology.

[37]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication and Networking: Opportunities and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[38]  Sean McKee,et al.  Modeling Arterial Wall Drug Concentrations Following the Insertion of a Drug-Eluting Stent , 2013, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[39]  Peter Adam Hoeher,et al.  Equivalent Discrete-Time Channel Modeling for Molecular Communication With Emphasize on an Absorbing Receiver , 2017, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[40]  David Holcman,et al.  Survival probability of diffusion with trapping in cellular neurobiology. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.