Remaining Useful Life Prediction through Failure Probability Computation for Condition-based Prognostics

The key goal in prognostics is to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of engineering systems in order to guide different types of decision-making activities such as path planning, fault mitigation, etc. The remaining useful life of an engineering component/system is defined as the first future time-instant in which a set of safety threshold conditions are violated. The violation of these conditions may render the system inoperable or even lead to catastrophic failure. This paper develops a computational methodology to analyze the aforementioned set of safety threshold conditions, calculate the probability of failure, and in turn, proposes a new hypothesis to mathematically connect such probability to the remaining useful life prediction. A significant advantage of the proposed methodology is that it is possible to learn important properties of the remaining useful life, without simulating the system until the occurrence of failure; this feature renders the proposed approach unique in comparison with existing directRUL-prediction approaches. The methodology also provides a systematic way of treating the different sources of uncertainty that may arise from imprecisely known future operating conditions, inaccurate state-of-health state estimates, use of imperfect models, etc. The proposed approach is developed using a model-based framework prognostics using principles of probability, and illustrated using a numerical example.

[1]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods , 2016 .

[2]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  A Model-Based Prognostics Approach Applied to Pneumatic Valves , 2011 .

[3]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Model-Based Prognostic Techniques Applied to a Suspension System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  G. Kacprzynski,et al.  Advances in uncertainty representation and management for particle filtering applied to prognostics , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[5]  James C. Newman FASTRAN-2: A fatigue crack growth structural analysis program , 1992 .

[6]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[7]  Stephen J. Engel,et al.  Prognostics, the real issues involved with predicting life remaining , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[8]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Why is the Remaining Useful Life Prediction Uncertain , 2013 .

[9]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Remaining useful life, technical health, and life extension , 2011 .

[10]  Chetan S. Kulkarni,et al.  Physics Based Electrolytic Capacitor Degradation Models for Prognostic Studies under Thermal Overstress , 2012 .

[11]  C. Bucher Adaptive sampling — an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure , 1988 .

[12]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Performance Evaluation for Fleet-based and Unit-based Prognostic Methods , 2014 .

[13]  Shankar Sankararaman,et al.  Significance, interpretation, and quantification of uncertainty in prognostics and remaining useful life prediction , 2015 .

[14]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Yongming Liu,et al.  Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution , 2009 .

[16]  M. Ciavarella,et al.  A generalized Paris' law for fatigue crack growth , 2006 .

[17]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Model-Based Prognostics With Concurrent Damage Progression Processes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[18]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  An Efficient Deterministic Approach to Model-based Prediction Uncertainty Estimation , 2012 .

[20]  D. C. Swanson,et al.  A general prognostic tracking algorithm for predictive maintenance , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[21]  P. E. James T. P. Yao,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design , 2001 .

[22]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[23]  Min Chen,et al.  Accurate electrical battery model capable of predicting runtime and I-V performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[24]  Michael Pecht,et al.  Application of a state space modeling technique to system prognostics based on a health index for condition-based maintenance , 2012 .

[25]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using First-Order Reliability Methods , 2014, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[26]  James A. Harter,et al.  AFGROW Users Guide and Technical Manual , 1999 .

[27]  Donald L. Iglehart,et al.  Importance sampling for stochastic simulations , 1989 .