Orienting students to studio learning

Murdoch University has instituted a shift to Studio Learning within 3rd and 4th years of all its undergraduate Engineering programs This is driven by industry demands for graduates who integrate and function effectively into organisations, developments in education theory towards considering education as active engagement and the learning expectations of current students. Considered a paradigm shift, Studio Learning involves confronting learners with situations modelled on professional practice. It is a group-based approach that requires the assistance of academics working as facilitators to provide guidance in a richer, holistic learning environment. In order to effect a 'cultural change' towards learning the relevant students were involved in a Studio orientation, providing students with the opportunity to learn about Studios by undergoing a Studio learning experience. A key component of the program was documentation of the process and the outcomes by way of an individual journal/diary indicating tasks, outcomes and times spent. Preliminary evidence indicates that students who were at Murdoch Engineering prior to the Studio week were better able to make the shift to Studio Learning. However, articulation students and (international) students joining the School on exchange programs found the learning model dis-orienting and confronting. Their reticence was replaced by increasing involvement as the week progressed, spurred on by the enthusiasm of other group members. Groups gelled as each student's discipline strengths came into play. Students demonstrated their engagement with this learning model: the quality of the final presentations and diversity of solutions emphasised their ability to be self motivated independent learners.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses , 1997 .

[3]  R. Felder Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. , 1993 .

[4]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature Students in Higher Education: II. An Investigation of Approaches to Studying and Academic Performance. , 1995 .

[5]  Denis M. S. Lee,et al.  Academic achievement, task characteristics, and first job performance of young engineers , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  D. M. S. Lee,et al.  Job challenge, work effort, and job performance of young engineers: a causal analysis , 1992 .

[7]  Leonard J. Waks,et al.  Donald Schon's Philosophy of Design and Design Education , 2001 .

[8]  S. Butler,et al.  Catalysing student autonomy through action research in a problem centred learning environment , 1999 .

[9]  G. Scott,et al.  Using successful graduates to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering programmes , 2002 .

[10]  Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren,et al.  Portraits of PBL: Course objectives and students' study strategies in computer engineering, psychology and physiotherapy , 2000 .

[11]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Denis M. S. Lee Social ties, task-related communication and first job performance of young engineers , 1994 .

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[14]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[15]  Julie E. Mills,et al.  Learning about Learning Styles: Can This Improve Engineering Education? , 2001 .

[16]  D. Jonas-Dwyer,et al.  The Millennial effect: Implications for academic development , 2004 .

[17]  Marjorie M. MacKinnon CORE Elements of Student Motivation in Problem‐Based Learning , 1999 .

[18]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[19]  Denis M. S. Lee Organizational entry and transition from academic study: examining a critical step in the professional development of young IS workers , 2004 .

[20]  Jocelyn Armarego,et al.  Quantitative learning conversations: Constructivism and its application to learning in an engineering environment , 2002 .

[21]  Denis M. S. Lee Educating Engineers in the Era of Computer-integrated Operations. , 1989 .

[22]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[23]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .