Trajectories in operating a handheld tool.

The authors studied the trajectories of the hand and of the tip of a handheld sliding first-order lever in aiming movements. With this kind of tool, straight trajectories of the hand are generally associated with curved trajectories of the tip of the lever and vice versa. Trajectories of the tip of the lever exhibited smaller deviations from straight paths than did trajectories of the hand, even though the cursor, which displayed the position of the tip of the lever on a computer monitor, was invisible during movement execution. These observations suggest that movement of the effective part of the tool is the primary kinematic variable in motor planning and control, even in the absence of continuous visual feedback. The presence of continuous visual feedback did not change the basic pattern of results, except that the remaining deviations from straight paths of the tip of the lever became smaller. These deviations most likely result from an inertial anisotropy of the tool, and they are reduced by visually based online corrections.

[1]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[3]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  H. Cruse,et al.  The human arm as a redundant manipulator: The control of path and joint angles , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  H Heuer,et al.  Learning new visuo-motor gains at early and late working age , 2007, Ergonomics.

[6]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The Inertial Anisotropy of the Arm Is Accurately Predicted during Movement Planning , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  W Hulstijn,et al.  Path curvature in workspace and in joint space: evidence for coexisting coordinative rules in aiming. , 1998, Motor control.

[8]  Mathias Hegele,et al.  Adaptation to a Nonlinear Visuomotor Amplitude Transformation With Continuous and Terminal Visual Feedback , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  T. Chan,et al.  The effect of density and diameter on haptic perception of rod length , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Ziaul Hasan,et al.  Circle-drawing movements at different speeds: role of inertial anisotropy. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Wilfried Kunde Antezedente Effektrepräsentationen in der Verhaltenssteuerung , 2006 .

[17]  F V TAYLOR,et al.  Two-dimensional tracking with identical and different control dynamics in each coordinate. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  J. M. Hollerbach,et al.  Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[21]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Why don't we perceive our brain states? , 1992 .

[23]  D. Katz Der Aufbau der Tastwelt , 1925 .

[24]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[25]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are Reaching Movements Planned to be Straight and Invariant in the Extrinsic Space? Kinematic Comparison between Compliant and Unconstrained Motions , 1999 .

[27]  W. L. Nelson Physical principles for economies of skilled movements , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[32]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensorimotor discordance: evidence for direction-independent gain control , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[38]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  J Richardson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the control of human arm movement. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  P. Viviani,et al.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[43]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Gentile,et al.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[45]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  E. Brenner,et al.  Moving one's finger to a visually specified position: target orientation influences the finger's path , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Paolo Viviani,et al.  Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. , 2002, Experimental brain research.

[49]  P. Morasso Three dimensional arm trajectories , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[50]  R. Chernikoff,et al.  Effect of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different coordinate dynamics. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[53]  R. Miall,et al.  The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experience , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  Martin Burghoff,et al.  Visuo-motor adaptation: evidence for a distributed amplitude control system , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[55]  Mathias Hegele,et al.  Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.