Distributed economic automatic generation control: A game theoretic perspective

Automatic generation control (AGC) is regularly used to maintain frequency stability and quality in multi-area power system. As each of control areas intend to achieve the best economy during AGC regulation, a concept of optimally economic AGC in a distributed manner arises and is required to investigate. Game theory provides a natural framework for such a kind of problems. Since different control areas may compete or cooperate with each other, cooperative and non-cooperative games are studied in this paper, and are further distinguished with different types of area control errors (ACEs). Two fully distributed, optimally economic AGC strategies for the two game models are proposed with a proof of convergence. Then the incentives and efficiency of cooperation in different control areas are discussed. Finally, the rudimentary IEEE 9-bus, 3-areas power system is used to verify the proposed methodology.

[1]  Na Li,et al.  Connecting Automatic Generation Control and Economic Dispatch From an Optimization View , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[2]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Game Approaches for Hybrid Power System Planning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[3]  Ibraheem,et al.  Recent philosophies of automatic generation control strategies in power systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Y. V. Makarov,et al.  Possible improvements of the ACE diversity interchange methodology , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[5]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Robust Optimization of Static Reserve Planning With Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[7]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Design and Stability of Load-Side Primary Frequency Control in Power Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Na Li,et al.  Demand response in radial distribution networks: Distributed algorithm , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[9]  Mohamed Zribi,et al.  Adaptive decentralized load frequency control of multi-area power systems , 2005 .

[10]  Ning Zhou,et al.  Improving area control error diversity interchange (ADI) program by incorporating congestion constraints , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.

[11]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Decentralized Primary Frequency Control in Power Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[12]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging , 2013 .

[13]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal Load Control via Frequency Measurement and Neighborhood Area Communication , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  A. R. Oneal,et al.  A simple method for improving control area performance: area control error (ACE) diversity interchange ADI , 1995 .

[15]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Optimal decentralized primary frequency control in power networks , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.