A pilot study of an electronic interprofessional evidence-based care planning tool for clients with mental health problems and addictions.

BACKGROUND The health system must develop effective solutions to the growing challenges it faces with respect to individuals who suffer with mental health disorders and addictions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usability and potential impact on outcomes of a knowledge translation system aimed at improving client-centered, evidence-based care for hospitalized individuals with schizophrenia. METHODOLOGY A pre-posttest design was used. The e-Volution-TREAT system was implemented on two inpatient units at a large mental health facility. Thirty-seven nurses, allied health workers, and physicians participated from two units. Data collection involved questionnaires, semistructured interviews, and observations. Thirty-eight consenting clients' outcome data were collected from organizational records. RESULTS Overall, staff participants were very satisfied with the functions of the e-Volution-TREAT system. Barriers to using the system were identified by participants related to the work environment, to understaffing, equipment problems, discomfort with technology, and a focus on short-term rather than long-term goals. There was moderate uptake of guidelines related to social issues, and low uptake of guidelines related to family support and addictions. There were significant improvements in four client outcomes over time, specifically aggressive behavior, depression, withdrawal, and psychosis. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, users were overall satisfied with the e-Volution-TREAT system, although expressed challenges related to workload that interfered with time to utilize the system. It would be premature to conclude the change in client outcomes was related to the e-Volution-TREAT system without a randomized controlled trial with outcomes compared to a control group. Future research needs to incorporate strategies for modifying the context and engage clinicians who are in a position of influence to model change.

[1]  Ranking of Outcome Domains for Use in Real-Time Outcomes Feedback Laboratory by Patients With Schizophrenia , 2008, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[2]  N. Ikegami,et al.  The resident assessment instrument-mental health (RAI-MH): Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity , 2002, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

[3]  Lars Wallin,et al.  Predicting Research Use in Nursing Organizations: A Multilevel Analysis , 2007, Nursing research.

[4]  D. Garman,et al.  Examining the Influence of Clinician Decision Making on Adherence to a Clinical Guideline , 2009 .

[5]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[6]  R. Bland,et al.  Better practices in collaborative mental health care: an analysis of the evidence base. , 2006, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[7]  S. Pampallona,et al.  Indicators of conformance with guidelines of schizophrenia treatment in mental health services. , 2008, Psychiatric services.

[8]  A. Kitson Recognising relationships: reflections on evidence-based practice. , 2002, Nursing inquiry.

[9]  D. Doran,et al.  Outcomes-focused knowledge translation: a framework for knowledge translation and patient outcomes improvement. , 2007, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[10]  E. Hawkins,et al.  Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: clinical results and practice suggestions. , 2005, Journal of clinical psychology.

[11]  K. Golden-Biddle,et al.  Understanding How Organizational Culture Shapes Research Use , 2005, The Journal of nursing administration.