Advancing Regulatory Science With Computational Modeling for Medical Devices at the FDA's Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories

Protecting and promoting public health is the mission of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), which regulates medical devices marketed in the U.S., envisions itself as the world's leader in medical device innovation and regulatory science–the development of new methods, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of medical devices. Traditionally, bench testing, animal studies, and clinical trials have been the main sources of evidence for getting medical devices on the market in the U.S. In recent years, however, computational modeling has become an increasingly powerful tool for evaluating medical devices, complementing bench, animal and clinical methods. Moreover, computational modeling methods are increasingly being used within software platforms, serving as clinical decision support tools, and are being embedded in medical devices. Because of its reach and huge potential, computational modeling has been identified as a priority by CDRH, and indeed by FDA's leadership. Therefore, the Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL)—the research arm of CDRH—has committed significant resources to transforming computational modeling from a valuable scientific tool to a valuable regulatory tool, and developing mechanisms to rely more on digital evidence in place of other evidence. This article introduces the role of computational modeling for medical devices, describes OSEL's ongoing research, and overviews how evidence from computational modeling (i.e., digital evidence) has been used in regulatory submissions by industry to CDRH in recent years. It concludes by discussing the potential future role for computational modeling and digital evidence in medical devices.

[1]  Dixie B. Baker,et al.  Patient-Centered Healthcare , 2001 .

[2]  Colin Camerer : Past , Present , Future , 2003 .

[3]  Farhad Ameri,et al.  Product Lifecycle Management: Closing the Knowledge Loops , 2005 .

[4]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[5]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Multireader multicase variance analysis for binary data. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  David G. Brown,et al.  Reader studies for validation of CAD systems , 2008, Neural Networks.

[7]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Accelerating Monte Carlo simulations of photon transport in a voxelized geometry using a massively parallel graphics processing unit. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  A Framework for Random-Effects ROC Analysis: Biases with the Bootstrap and Other Variance Estimators , 2009 .

[9]  Joshua E. Soneson,et al.  A User‐Friendly Software Package for HIFU Simulation , 2009 .

[10]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Christopher R Kinsinger,et al.  Protein-based multiplex assays: mock presubmissions to the US Food and Drug Administration. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future , 2011, Diabetes.

[13]  M. Hamburg,et al.  Advancing Regulatory Science , 2011, Science.

[14]  Michael A. Colman,et al.  42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  L. Angelone,et al.  Evaluation of unintended electrical stimulation from MR gradient fields. , 2012, Frontiers in bioscience.

[16]  Prachi Pradeep,et al.  Use of QSAR Modeling to Predict the Carcinogenicity of Color Additives , 2013 .

[17]  David G Strauss,et al.  Evaluating strict and conventional left bundle branch block criteria using electrocardiographic simulations. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Quanzeng Wang,et al.  Optical-thermal light-tissue interactions during photoacoustic breast imaging. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[19]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances , 2014, Journal of medical imaging.

[20]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: the Virtual Population 3.0 , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Niels Kuster,et al.  A computational model for bipolar deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Viatcheslav Gurev,et al.  A high-resolution computational model of the deforming human heart , 2015, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[23]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  A Novel Brain Stimulation Technology Provides Compatibility with MRI , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Emil Y Sidky,et al.  Compressive sensing in medical imaging. , 2015, Applied optics.

[25]  Niels Kuster,et al.  MIDA: A Multimodal Imaging-Based Detailed Anatomical Model of the Human Head and Neck , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  James C Coburn,et al.  Prediction of contact mechanics in metal-on-metal Total Hip Replacement for parametrically comprehensive designs and loads. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Embedded Control in Wearable Medical Devices: Application to the Artificial Pancreas , 2016 .

[28]  Subhashini Venugopalan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. , 2016, JAMA.

[29]  Christian G. Graff,et al.  A new, open-source, multi-modality digital breast phantom , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[30]  N. Duraiswamy,et al.  A Parametric Computational Study of the Impact of Non-circular Configurations on Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Deformations and Stresses: Possible Implications for Transcatheter Heart Valves , 2016, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[31]  Dawn Bardot,et al.  Augmenting a Clinical Study With Virtual Patient Models: Food and Drug Administration and Industry Collaboration , 2016 .

[32]  Richard A. Gray,et al.  A Parsimonious Model of the Rabbit Action Potential Elucidates the Minimal Physiological Requirements for Alternans and Spiral Wave Breakup , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Maria Ida Iacono,et al.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  In silico assessment of biomedical products: The conundrum of rare but not so rare events in two case studies , 2017, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[35]  Wolfgang Kainz,et al.  The Role of Computational Modeling and Simulation in the Total Product Life Cycle of Peripheral Vascular Devices. , 2017, Journal of medical devices.

[36]  B. A. Craven,et al.  Computational predictions of the embolus-trapping performance of an IVC filter in patient-specific and idealized IVC geometries , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[37]  Jeffrey Shuren,et al.  An FDA Viewpoint on Unique Considerations for Medical-Device Clinical Trials. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  J. Soneson Extending the Utility of the Parabolic Approximation in Medical Ultrasound Using Wide-Angle Diffraction Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[39]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants , 2017, NeuroImage.

[40]  Bu S. Park,et al.  RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[41]  Richard A. Malinauskas,et al.  Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations , 2017, PloS one.

[42]  P. Hariharan,et al.  Quantification of leakage of sub-micron aerosols through surgical masks and facemasks for pediatric use , 2017, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[43]  Loren Miller,et al.  Product Innovation Through Computational Prototypes and Supercomputing , 2017, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[44]  Ulrich Steinseifer,et al.  FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation , 2017, ASAIO journal.

[45]  Maria Ida Iacono,et al.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[46]  Keefe B Manning,et al.  A resolved two-way coupled CFD/6-DOF approach for predicting embolus transport and the embolus-trapping efficiency of IVC filters , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[47]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  3D convolutional neural network for automatic detection of lung nodules in chest CT , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[48]  P. Hariharan,et al.  Model for Porosity Changes Occurring during Ultrasound-Enhanced Transcorneal Drug Delivery. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[49]  Quanzeng Wang,et al.  FDA Seminar on V&V for Computational Modeling of Medical Devices , 2017 .

[50]  Frank W. Samuelson,et al.  In silico imaging clinical trials for regulatory evaluation: initial considerations for VICTRE, a demonstration study , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[51]  Andrew P. Baumann,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of Tamponade Multicomponent Gases During Retina Reattachment Surgery , 2017 .

[52]  M. Dreher,et al.  Development of a Flow Evolution Network Model for the Stress-Strain Behavior of Poly(L-lactide). , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[53]  Srinidhi Nagaraja,et al.  Relationships among ultrasonic and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in human calcaneus in vitro. , 2017, Bone.

[54]  Ki H. Chon,et al.  Detecting Interactions between the Renal Autoregulation Mechanisms in Time and Space , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Adam Himes,et al.  Incorporation of stochastic engineering models as prior information in Bayesian medical device trials , 2017, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[56]  Pras Pathmanathan,et al.  Applicability Analysis of Validation Evidence for Biomedical Computational Models , 2017 .

[57]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  David D Simon,et al.  Predicting patient exposure to nickel released from cardiovascular devices using multi-scale modeling. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[59]  Jiwen Zheng,et al.  Improving risk assessment of color additives in medical device polymers. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[60]  Brian P. Baillargeon,et al.  Validating Fatigue Safety Factor Calculation Methods for Cardiovascular Stents. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[61]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Towards the use of computationally inserted lesions for mammographic CAD assessment , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[62]  P. Hariharan,et al.  A mathematical model for assessing the effectiveness of protective devices in reducing risk of infection by inhalable droplets. , 2016, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[63]  Pras Pathmanathan,et al.  Validation and Trustworthiness of Multiscale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[64]  L. Wald,et al.  Realistic modeling of deep brain stimulation implants for electromagnetic MRI safety studies , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  Sandy Weininger,et al.  Regulatory Considerations for Physiological Closed-Loop Controlled Medical Devices Used for Automated Critical Care: Food and Drug Administration Workshop Discussion Topics , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[66]  W. Kainz,et al.  A numerical investigation on the effect of RF coil feed variability on global and local electromagnetic field exposure in human body models at 64 MHz , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[67]  Bahram Parvinian,et al.  Control-oriented physiological modeling of hemodynamic responses to blood volume perturbation. , 2018, Control engineering practice.

[68]  P. Pathmanathan,et al.  Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Computational Modeling: Diversity of Personalization and Challenges , 2018, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[69]  J. E. Rinaldi,et al.  A test method to assess the contribution of fluid shear stress to the cleaning of reusable device surfaces. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[70]  Ronald P. Brown,et al.  Predicting Plasma Free Hemoglobin Levels in Patients Due to Medical Device–Related Hemolysis , 2019, ASAIO journal.

[71]  AUC , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.