Errors in judging the approach rate of motorcycles in nighttime conditions and the effect of an improved lighting configuration.

One of the key contributory factors for accident involvement is misjudgment of approach speed (Department for Transport, 2010). Past research has indicated that individuals can use the rate of visual looming in order to the judge time to passage (TTP) of approaching vehicles, and that smaller vehicles loom to a lesser extent than larger vehicles (e.g., Horswill et al., 2005). However, the judgment of TTP in nighttime conditions has received little attention. This paper explores drivers' abilities to make judgments of motorcycles and car approach speeds in nighttime driving conditions, when only the headlights are visible, as well as the effectiveness of a tri-headlight configuration on the accuracy of motorcycle speed judgments. Results showed that individuals were significantly more accurate at judging the speed of two car headlights compared with the standard solo headlight motorcycle. However, the inclusion of a tri-headlight formation on a standard motorcycle frame significantly improved these judgments. A further investigation demonstrated that tri-headlight configurations with separation between headlights on the horizontal and vertical axes are most effective for yielding accurate speed judgments. The implications of the results for road safety and motorcycle design are discussed.

[1]  Michael Sivak,et al.  The Effect of Improvements in Motorcycle/Motorcyclist Conspicuity on Driver Behavior , 1981 .

[2]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  P. Hancock,et al.  The Perception of Arrival Time for Different Oncoming Vehicles at an Intersection , 1994 .

[4]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Jac Billington,et al.  An fMRI study of parietal cortex involvement in the visual guidance of locomotion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  John P. Wann,et al.  Perceiving Time to Collision Activates the Sensorimotor Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[9]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[11]  B. Frost,et al.  Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Mark S Horswill,et al.  Motorcycle Accident Risk Could Be Inflated by a Time to Arrival Illusion , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  Bernhard Schlag,et al.  Recognisability of different configurations of front lights on motorcycles. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[15]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Conspicuity of Motorcycles , 1979 .

[16]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Graham J Hole,et al.  Some factors affecting motorcyclists' conspicuity , 1996 .

[18]  Patricia R. DeLucia,et al.  Judgments about collision in younger and older drivers , 2003 .