Structural Properties of Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility

Structural properties of diesel particles preclassified by particle mobility and mass are measured using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). These measurements enable us to determine the dynamic shape factor and inherent material density of diesel particles. We also compare fractal dimensions obtained independently using two different approaches. We show that the projected area equivalent diameter of mobility-classified diesel particles nearly equals the mobility diameter in the size range reported here (50 to 220 nm). Evidence for doubly charged particles and possible “fragments” are observed for DMA-classified particles on TEM substrates. The fractal dimension was obtained using two independent approaches. Images obtained by TEM were analyzed to determine the maximum length and the number of primary particles. The fractal dimension obtained from these measurements, D fL, was 1.75. The fractal dimension obtained from the mass-mobility relationship, D fm was 2.35. We found that these values are in reasonable agreement after accounting for the relationship between the projected area diameter and maximum length. The size-dependent dynamic shape factor and inherent material density of diesel particles are obtained from independent measurements of mobility (DMA), mass (APM), and volume (TEM). We found that the dynamic shape factor increased from 1.11 to 2.21, and that the inherent material density increased from 1.27 to 1.78 g/cm3 as particle mobility size increased from 50 to 220 nm. The increase in dynamic shape factor with size occurs because large particles are more irregular than smaller ones. The increase in density occurs because the ratio of elemental carbon to condensed organics increases with increasing size.

[1]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2004 .

[2]  David B Kittelson,et al.  Size-dependent mixing characteristics of volatile and nonvolatile components in diesel exhaust aerosols. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-line measurements of diesel nanoparticle composition and volatility , 2003 .

[4]  G. Kasper,et al.  Impact fragmentation of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2003 .

[5]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Xin Wang,et al.  The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density , 2002 .

[7]  Choongsik Bae,et al.  Detailed Characterization of Morphology and Dimensions of Diesel Particulates via Thermophoretic Sampling , 2001 .

[8]  D. Kittelson,et al.  The influence of dilution conditions on diesel exhaust particle size distribution measurements , 1999 .

[9]  A. M. Brasil,et al.  a Recipe for Image Characterization of Fractal-Like Aggregates , 1998 .

[10]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[11]  C. Oh,et al.  The Effect of Overlap between Monomers on the Determination of Fractal Cluster Morphology , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  K. Coakley,et al.  Novel method to classify aerosol particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass analyser , 1996 .

[13]  Christopher M. Sorensen,et al.  The Morphology of Macroscopic Soot , 1996 .

[14]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Fractal Morphology Analysis of Combustion-Generated Aggregates Using Angular Light Scattering and Electron Microscope Images , 1995 .

[15]  Christopher M. Sorensen,et al.  Analysis of Fractal Cluster Morphology Parameters: Structural Coefficient and Density Autocorrelation Function Cutoff , 1995 .

[16]  Tiago L. Farias,et al.  Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates , 1995 .

[17]  Hung V. Nguyen,et al.  The Mobility and Structure of Aerosol Agglomerates , 1993 .

[18]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Structure of Overfire Soot in Buoyant Turbulent Diffusion Flames at Long Residence Times , 1992 .

[19]  W. P. Kelly,et al.  Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer–Generated Monodisperse Aerosols , 1992 .

[20]  Constantine M. Megaridis,et al.  Morphological Description of Flame-Generated Materials , 1990 .

[21]  S. Tohno,et al.  Morphological and dynamic characterization of Pb fume particles undergoing Brownian coagulation , 1990 .

[22]  Paul Meakin,et al.  Collisions between point masses and fractal aggregates , 1989 .

[23]  Dale W. Schaefer,et al.  Fractal Models and the Structure of Materials , 1988 .

[24]  A. Schmidt-Ott Physical characterization of agglomerated aerosol particles through size-invariant fractal properties , 1988 .

[25]  James W. Gentry,et al.  Structural analysis of soot agglomerates , 1987 .

[26]  J. Brickmann B. Mandelbrot: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Co., San Francisco 1982. 460 Seiten, Preis: £ 22,75. , 1985 .

[27]  G. Kasper Dynamics and Measurement of Smokes. I Size Characterization of Nonspherical Particles , 1982 .

[28]  J. J. Collins,et al.  Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. 2 , 1979 .

[29]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Design and evaluation of new low-pressure impactor. I , 1978 .

[30]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[31]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .