An industry perspective on the monitoring of subvisible particles as a quality attribute for protein therapeutics.

Concern around the lack of monitoring of proteinaceous subvisible particulates in the 0.1-10 microm range has been heightened (Carpenter et al., 2009, J Pharm Sci 98: 1202-1205), primarily due to uncertainty around the potential immunogenicity risk from these particles. This article, representing the opinions of a number of industry scientists, aims to further the discussion by developing a common understanding around the technical capabilities, limitations, as well as utility of monitoring this size range; reiterating that the link between aggregation and clinical immunogenicity has not been unequivocally established; and emphasizing that such particles are present in marketed products which remain safe and efficacious despite the lack of monitoring. Measurement of subvisible particulates in the <10 microm size range has value as an aid in product development and characterization. Limitations in measurement technologies, variability from container/closure, concentration, viscosity, history, and inherent batch heterogeneity, make these measurements unsuitable as specification for release and stability or for comparability, at the present time. Such particles constitute microgram levels of protein with currently monitored sizes >or=10 microm representing the largest fraction. These levels are well below what is detected or reported for other product quality attributes. Subvisible particles remain a product quality attribute that is also qualified in clinical trials.

[1]  C Russell Middaugh,et al.  Influence of aggregation on immunogenicity of recombinant human Factor VIII in hemophilia A mice. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  W. Jiskoot,et al.  Development of a Transgenic Mouse Model Immune Tolerant for Human Interferon Beta , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[3]  P. Bugelski,et al.  Predictive power of preclinical studies in animals for the immunogenicity of recombinant therapeutic proteins in humans. , 2004, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[4]  Hanns-Christian Mahler,et al.  Protein aggregation: pathways, induction factors and analysis. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Protein Aggregation and Particle Formation: Effects of Formulation, Interfaces, and Drug Product Manufacturing Operations , 2010 .

[6]  J Z Knapp The scientific basis for visible particle inspection. , 1999, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[7]  Huub Schellekens,et al.  Antibody response to aggregated human interferon alpha2b in wild-type and transgenic immune tolerant mice depends on type and level of aggregation. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  F. Etzler,et al.  Particle Size Analysis: A comparative study of various methods , 1995 .

[9]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[10]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  A risk-based approach to immunogenicity concerns of therapeutic protein products: Part 2. Considering host-specific and product-specific factors impacting immunogenicity , 2004 .

[11]  H. Schellekens How to predict and prevent the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. , 2008, Biotechnology annual review.

[12]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  A risk-based approach to immunogenicity concerns of therapeutic protein product, Pat III , 2004 .

[13]  Hanns-Christian Mahler,et al.  Shaken, not stirred: mechanical stress testing of an IgG1 antibody. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  J. Philo Is any measurement method optimal for all aggregate sizes and types? , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[15]  F. Etzler,et al.  Particle size analysis: A comparison of various methods ii , 1997 .

[16]  P. White,et al.  Generic construction of single component particles that elicit humoural and cellular immune responses without the need for adjuvants. , 2008, Vaccine.

[17]  J. Philo,et al.  A critical review of methods for size characterization of non-particulate protein aggregates. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[18]  Chi-Ting Huang,et al.  Quantitation of protein particles in parenteral solutions using micro-flow imaging. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  Jochem Alsenz,et al.  Protein Aggregates Seem to Play a Key Role Among the Parameters Influencing the Antigenicity of Interferon Alpha (IFN-α) in Normal and Transgenic Mice , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.

[20]  Joey Pollastrini,et al.  Separation and characterization of protein aggregates and particles by field flow fractionation. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[21]  J. Foote,et al.  Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies. , 2005, Methods.

[22]  Amber Haynes Fradkin,et al.  Immunogenicity of aggregates of recombinant human growth hormone in mouse models. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  L. Narhi,et al.  A critical review of analytical methods for subvisible and visible particles. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[24]  Huub Schellekens,et al.  Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[25]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[26]  Steven Kozlowski,et al.  Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: gaps that may compromise product quality. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[27]  C. Schneider,et al.  How to systematically evaluate immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins - regulatory considerations. , 2009, New biotechnology.