Injury prevention: achieving population-level change

Injury remains a leading cause of death and disability for all sectors of the community in all regions of the world.1–3 Since the 1960s when injury was conceptualised as a public health problem, there has been an escalation of knowledge relating to ‘what works’ to prevent injury. However, the rapid development of new injury prevention knowledge is quickly outstripping society’s capacity to implement it.4 This supplement of Injury Prevention brings together examples of empirical-based injury prevention research that demonstrate the state-of-the-art methods of achieving population-level reductions in injury-related harm. The issue also includes contributions that make the case for expanding existing public health paradigms of injury prevention beyond ‘what works’ and towards understanding the contexts and supports necessary for embedding effective injury prevention interventions within sustainable, synergistic systems of safety promotion. Population health science is one orienting frame for understanding and addressing the conditions that shape large-scale distributions of injury outcomes. Galea and Keyes5 describe how population health science can inform public health action in terms of ‘what works’ and ‘when’ and ‘for whom’. They pose a series of considerations injury researchers can use to both uncover the …

[1]  Nobhojit Roy,et al.  The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013 , 2015, Injury Prevention.

[2]  Carl Bonander,et al.  Compared with what? Estimating the effects of injury prevention policies using the synthetic control method , 2017, Injury Prevention.

[3]  J. MacKay,et al.  Human rights-based approach to unintentional injury prevention , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[4]  E. Caine,et al.  Comprehensive, integrated approaches to suicide prevention: practical guidance , 2017, Injury Prevention.

[5]  D. Luke,et al.  Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. , 2012, Annual review of public health.

[6]  M. Petticrew,et al.  The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health , 2017, The Lancet.

[7]  Caroline F Finch,et al.  Closing the Gap between Injury Prevention Research and Community Safety Promotion Practice: Revisiting the Public Health Model , 2012, Public health reports.

[8]  Carlyn Muir,et al.  Evolution of a holistic systems approach to planning and managing road safety: the Victorian case study, 1970–2015 , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[9]  Lawrence W Green,et al.  Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? , 2006, American journal of public health.

[10]  W. Trochim,et al.  Systems thinking to improve the public's health. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  A. Hamade,et al.  New York City’s window guard policy: four decades of success , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[12]  Keshia M. Pollack,et al.  How the science of injury prevention contributes to advancing home fire safety in the USA: successes and opportunities , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[13]  R. Spicer,et al.  Building the Child Safety Collaborative Innovation and Improvement Network: How does it work and what is it achieving? , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[14]  I. Pike,et al.  Social marketing to address attitudes and behaviours related to preventable injuries in British Columbia, Canada , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[15]  Qingfeng Li,et al.  A social change perspective on injury prevention in China , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[16]  N. Wilkins,et al.  Systemic approach for injury and violence prevention: what we can learn from the Harlem Children’s Zone and Promise Neighborhoods , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[17]  S. Galea,et al.  What matters, when, for whom? three questions to guide population health scholarship , 2017, Injury Prevention.