Protecting and Enhancing Eyewitness Memory: The Impact of an Initial Recall Attempt on Performance in an Investigative Interview

Evidence-gathering begins at the scene of an incident. Available witnesses may be asked to provide an account of what happened, either in response to an open request for information or, in some regions, by completing a Self-Administered Interview (SAI©). In both cases, an investigative interview may be conducted at some later date. This study sought to determine the impact of an initial retrieval attempt on a subsequent interview. After exposure to a mock crime, participants completed an SAI© or a free recall (FR), or did not engage in an initial retrieval (Control). One week later, participants were interviewed with a Cognitive Interview. SAI© participants reported more correct information and maintained higher accuracy than FR and Control participants. Consistency analyses revealed that the SAI© was effective because it preserved more of the originally recalled items (Time 1) than did an initial FR, and not because it yielded new recollections at Time 2.

[1]  W A Wickelgren,et al.  Retention functions for syntactic and lexical vs semantic information in sentence recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Sean M. Lane,et al.  Source Misattributions and the Suggestibility of Eyewitness Memory , 1994 .

[3]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Interviewing Cooperative Witnesses , 2010 .

[4]  R. Fisher,et al.  The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory , 2006 .

[5]  Neil Brewer,et al.  The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  R. Potter,et al.  Perceptions of witness behaviour‐accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and mock‐jurors , 1999 .

[7]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model , 1998 .

[8]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[9]  Lorraine Hope,et al.  Protecting Eyewitness Evidence: Examining the Efficacy of a Self-Administered Interview Tool , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[10]  R. Fisher,et al.  Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. , 1987 .

[11]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  Lorraine Hope,et al.  Protecting Against Misleading Post‐event Information with a Self‐Administered Interview , 2012 .

[14]  R. Fisher,et al.  Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control , 2011 .

[15]  Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time , 2005 .

[16]  R. Fisher,et al.  Field test of the Cognitive Interview: enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  A. Pansky,et al.  Enhancing the quantity and accuracy of eyewitness memory via initial memory testing , 2012 .

[18]  R. Fisher,et al.  Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Misleading postevent information and memory for events: arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  M. Johnson,et al.  Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[21]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall , 1982 .

[22]  J. Wixted,et al.  Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  F. L. Bailey,et al.  Successful techniques for criminal trials , 1971 .

[25]  M. A. Safer,et al.  Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  R. Fisher,et al.  Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview , 1992 .

[27]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Malcolm D. MacLeod,et al.  Retrieval‐induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: forgetting as a consequence of remembering , 2002 .

[29]  R. Bull,et al.  Interviewing Cooperative Witnesses , 2011 .

[30]  Lorraine Hope,et al.  From laboratory to the street: capturing witness memory using the Self-Administered Interview , 2011 .

[31]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubated reminiscence effects , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Pipe,et al.  Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children's eyewitness memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Amy Wenzel,et al.  One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention , 1996 .

[35]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation between Consistency and Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony: Legal versus Cognitive Explanations , 2009 .

[36]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. , 1988 .

[37]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. , 2010 .

[38]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Superiority of free recall to cued recall with “strong” cues , 1983 .

[39]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Inhibitory processes and the control of memory retrieval , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  A. Koriat,et al.  What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  P. Brock,et al.  Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. , 1999 .

[43]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Hypermnesia: the role of repeated testing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  John R. Anderson.  A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[45]  M. Erdelyi,et al.  Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not words in multiple recall trials☆ , 1974 .

[46]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  How eyewitnesses talk about events: implications for memory , 2005 .

[47]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Generality of a strength model for three conditions of repeated recall , 1984 .

[48]  Aileen Oeberst.  If Anything Else Comes to Mind… Better Keep It to Yourself? Delayed Recall is Discrediting—Unjustifiably , 2011 .

[49]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Tests and test feedback as learning sources , 1991 .

[50]  Louise Ellison,et al.  The mosaic art?: cross-examination and the vulnerable witness 1 , 2001, Legal Studies.

[51]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval. , 1994 .

[52]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[53]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[54]  B. Bornstein,et al.  Repeated testing in eyewitness memory : A means to improve recall of a negative emotional event , 1998 .

[55]  R. Fisher,et al.  Enhancing Older Adult Eyewitness Memory with the Cognitive Interview , 1996 .