Application and Monitoring of Oxidative Alginate–Biocide Hydrogels for Two Case Studies in “The Sassi and the Park of the Rupestrian Churches of Matera”

The removal of biological colonization on building materials of cultural heritage is a difficult challenge, as the treatment must completely eliminate the biological patina without altering the treated substrate and possibly delaying new colonization. With the aim of searching for systems to minimize the biocide impact on the substrate, the environment and the operators, different alginate–oxidizing biocide hydrogels were previously tested and optimized in the laboratory and here selected for application in situ. The churches “San Pietro Barisano” and “Madonna dei Derelitti”, located in the Sassi of Matera (UNESCO World Heritage Site in Basilicata region, Italy), were chosen as case studies. They differ in terms of both the environmental conditions and the microorganisms responsible for colonization. Colorimetric measurements and microscopic investigation proved the efficacy of biocide hydrogels in removing biopatinas and in restoring the original chromaticity of the selected treated surfaces of both sites. After the biocidal treatments, new protective acrylic coatings were applied to prevent recolonization and minimize the loss of material grains. Samples collected, immediately after and two years later, established the absence of biological colonization, demonstrating the long-term efficacy of the proposed restoration protocol.

[1]  C. Riminesi,et al.  Efficacy of the environmentally sustainable microwave heating compared to biocide applications in the devitalization of phototrophic communities colonizing rock engravings of Valle Camonica, UNESCO world heritage site, Italy , 2021, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation.

[2]  L. Bruno,et al.  New oxidative alginate-biocide hydrogels against stone biodeterioration , 2021 .

[3]  H. Viles,et al.  Revisiting and reanalysing the concept of bioreceptivity 25 years on. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  M. Chiarini,et al.  Alginate-biocide hydrogel for the removal of biofilms from calcareous stone artworks , 2021 .

[5]  E. Zanardini,et al.  Biocleaning on Cultural Heritage: new frontiers of microbial biotechnologies , 2021, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  Federica Villa,et al.  The Control of Cultural Heritage Microbial Deterioration , 2020, Microorganisms.

[7]  Cristiano Riminesi,et al.  Assessment of different methods for the removal of biofilms and lichens on gravestones of the English Cemetery in Florence , 2020 .

[8]  A. Sprocati,et al.  Biocidal Activity of Phyto-Derivative Products Used on Phototrophic Biofilms Growing on Stone Surfaces of the Domus Aurea in Rome (Italy) , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[9]  I. Camele,et al.  Preliminary Studies on Fungal Contamination of Two Rupestrian Churches from Matera (Southern Italy) , 2020 .

[10]  A. Romani,et al.  Hydrogels: A ‘stepping stone’ towards new cleaning strategies for biodeteriorated surfaces , 2020 .

[11]  N. Nikolić,et al.  Lampenflora and the entrance biofilm in two show caves: comparison of microbial community, environmental, and biofilm parameters , 2020 .

[12]  M. Chiarini,et al.  1H-NMR-relaxation and colorimetry for evaluating nanopolymeric dispersions as stone protective coatings , 2020 .

[13]  P. Visca,et al.  Changes in biodeterioration patterns of mural paintings: Multi-temporal mapping for a preventive conservation strategy in the Crypt of the Original Sin (Matera, Italy) , 2019, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[14]  Ji-Dong Gu,et al.  Controlling biodeterioration of cultural heritage objects with biocides: A review , 2019, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation.

[15]  Piero Baglioni,et al.  Poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogels for the cleaning of art. , 2019, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[16]  S. E. Favero-Longo,et al.  Biocide efficacy and consolidant effect on the mycoflora of historical stuccos in indoor environment , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[17]  Fabien Borderie,et al.  Comparison of biocides, allelopathic substances and UV-C as treatments for biofilm proliferation on heritage monuments , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[18]  J. S. Pozo-Antonio,et al.  In situ evaluation by colour spectrophotometry of cleaning and protective treatments in granitic Cultural Heritage , 2017 .

[19]  L. Bruno,et al.  Effects of biocide treatments on the biofilm community in Domitilla's catacombs in Rome. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  J. S. Pozo-Antonio,et al.  Effectiveness of granite cleaning procedures in cultural heritage: A review. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Carl H. Schiesser,et al.  Heteroorganic molecules and bacterial biofilms: Controlling biodeterioration of cultural heritage , 2016 .

[22]  Piero Tiano,et al.  Biodeterioration of Stone Monuments a Worldwide Issue , 2016 .

[23]  A. Massalski,et al.  Biodiversity of Limestone Caves: Aggregations of Aerophytic Algae and Cyanobacteria in Relation to Site Factors , 2015, Polish Journal of Ecology.

[24]  Zuzana Slížková,et al.  In situ peeling tests for assessing the cohesion and consolidation characteristics of historic plaster and render surfaces , 2015 .

[25]  Piero Baglioni,et al.  Micelle, microemulsions, and gels for the conservation of cultural heritage. , 2014, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[26]  K. Sterflinger,et al.  Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art — tilting at windmills? , 2013, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  Piero Baglioni,et al.  Colloid and materials science for the conservation of cultural heritage: cleaning, consolidation, and deacidification. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  A. Z. Miller,et al.  Bioreceptivity of building stones: a review. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  P. Albertano,et al.  Characteristics and role of the exocellular polysaccharides produced by five cyanobacteria isolated from phototrophic biofilms growing on stone monuments , 2012, Biofouling.

[30]  P. Rupérez,et al.  FTIR-ATR spectroscopy as a tool for polysaccharide identification in edible brown and red seaweeds , 2011 .

[31]  A. Z. Miller,et al.  Biodiversity of cyanobacteria and green algae on monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: an overview. , 2009, Microbiology.

[32]  Paolo Visca,et al.  Biodeterioration of mural paintings in a rocky habitat: The Crypt of the Original Sin (Matera, Italy) , 2009 .

[33]  Akio Takemura,et al.  Simplified method for estimation of composition of alginates by FTIR , 2004 .

[34]  F. De Leo,et al.  Sampling with adhesive tape strips: an easy and rapid method to monitor microbial colonization on monument surfaces. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[35]  J. Braams,et al.  Biodeterioration of stone: a review , 2000 .

[36]  A. Mikos,et al.  Preparation of macroporous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels by enhanced phase separation. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[37]  O. Guillitte,et al.  Bioreceptivity : a new concept for building ecology studies , 1995 .

[38]  L. Bruno,et al.  A study for monitoring and conservation in the Roman Catacombs of St. Callistus and Domitilla, Rome (Italy). , 2014 .

[39]  P. Albertano Cyanobacterial Biofilms in Monuments and Caves , 2012 .

[40]  C. Gaylarde,et al.  Microbial deterioration of stone monuments--an updated overview. , 2009, Advances in applied microbiology.

[41]  M. Roldán,et al.  Exploring the secrets of the three-dimensional architecture of phototrophic biofilms in caves , 2009 .