Ultrasensitive synthetic protein regulatory networks using mixed decoys.

Cellular protein interaction networks exhibit sigmoidal input-output relationships with thresholds and steep responses (i.e., ultrasensitivity). Although cooperativity can be a source of ultrasensitivity, we examined whether the presence of "decoy" binding sites that are not coupled to activation could also lead to this effect. To systematically vary key parameters of the system, we designed a synthetic regulatory system consisting of an autoinhibited PDZ domain coupled to an activating SH3 domain binding site. In the absence of a decoy binding site, this system is non-ultrasensitive, as predicted by modeling of this system. Addition of a high-affinity decoy site adds a threshold, but the response is not ultrasensitive. We found that sigmoidal activation profiles can be generated utilizing multiple decoys with mixtures of high and low affinities, where high affinity decoys act to set the threshold and low affinity decoys ensure a sigmoidal response. Placing the synthetic decoy system in a mitotic spindle orientation cell culture system thresholds this physiological activity. Thus, simple combinations of non-activating binding sites can lead to complex regulatory responses in protein interaction networks.

[1]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  How Src exercises self-restraint , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  K. Prehoda,et al.  Internal recognition through PDZ domain plasticity in the Par-6–Pals1 complex , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[4]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .

[5]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  I. Mellman,et al.  Coordinated protein sorting, targeting and distribution in polarized cells , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  C. Doe,et al.  Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/ Dlg Spindle Orientation Pathway using Induced Cell Polarity in S2 Cells , 2009, Cell.

[10]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. , 1995, Structure.

[11]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[12]  Engineering modular protein interaction switches by sequence overlap. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Engineering synthetic signaling proteins with ultrasensitive input/output control , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  W. Lim,et al.  Mechanism and role of PDZ domains in signaling complex assembly. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[15]  J. Tyson,et al.  Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[16]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[17]  D. Rotin,et al.  Regulation of ion transport by protein–protein interaction domains , 1997, Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension.

[18]  N. R. Smith,et al.  Robust spindle alignment in Drosophila neuroblasts by ultrasensitive activation of pins. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[19]  D. Koshland,et al.  Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. , 1982, Science.

[20]  David Cowburn,et al.  Development of highly selective SH3 binding peptides for Crk and CRKL which disrupt Crk-complexes with DOCK180, SoS and C3G , 1998, Oncogene.

[21]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  J. Gunawardena Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[25]  J E Ferrell,et al.  Building a cellular switch: more lessons from a good egg. , 1999, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[26]  M. Pufall,et al.  Autoinhibitory domains: modular effectors of cellular regulation. , 2002, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  J. Ferrell Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[28]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network , 2009, Molecular systems biology.