Verification and validation of CFD simulations for local flow dynamics in a draft tube airlift bioreactor

Abstract Airlift reactors have been recognized as one of the promising photobioreactors for biomass/bio-energy production, where mixing has significant impact on the reactor performance. In recent years, using CFD simulations to track microorganism cells and to generate their trajectories in the reactor for reactor performance evaluations becomes more common. However, there is a lack of systematic and rigorous verifications and validations of the reliability of CFD models in particle tracking against experimental measurements in the open literature, which is vital for the faithful application of CFD in reactor design and scale-ups. In this work, we attempt to evaluate the reliability of using CFD simulations to generate trajectories of microorganisms in a draft tube column photobioreactor. A computationally promising CFD simulation model based on CFX5.7 was validated against a benchmark experimental database reported in Luo and Al-Dahhan, 2008a , Luo and Al-Dahhan, 2008b , Luo and Al-Dahhan, 2010 . This model was then used to generate typical trajectories of microorganisms in the studied airlift column, which was further validated against experimentally measured tracer trajectories. The results indicated that the CFD model reasonably predicted the recirculation of the microorganism around the draft tube, however over-estimated the cells' residence time in the wall regions. Proper treatment for the wall region such as griding and wall function is needed to better capture the movement of microorganism cells in such bioreactors.

[1]  Santiago Laín,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of the hydrodynamics in a bubble column , 1999 .

[2]  Sef J. Heijnen,et al.  Large‐scale anaerobic/aerobic treatment of complex industrial wastewater using immobilized biomass in fluidized bed and air‐lift suspension reactors , 1990 .

[3]  P. Saffman The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  N. Zuber,et al.  Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows , 1979 .

[5]  E. Molina Grima,et al.  Use of concentric-tube airlift photobioreactors for microalgal outdoor mass cultures , 1999 .

[6]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  A three-demensional CFD model for gas-liquid bubble columns , 1999 .

[7]  N. Markatos,et al.  The mathematical modelling of turbulent flows , 1986 .

[8]  Yusuf Chisti,et al.  Pneumatically Agitated Bioreactors in Industrial and Environmental Bioprocessing: Hydrodynamics, Hydraulics, and Transport Phenomena , 1998 .

[9]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Dynamic simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow: effect of column aspect ratio on the flow structure. , 1997 .

[10]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  Simulation of Buoyancy Driven Bubbly Flow: Established Simplifications and Open Questions (Journal Review) , 2004 .

[11]  Mandar Tabib,et al.  CFD simulation of bubble column—An analysis of interphase forces and turbulence models , 2008 .

[12]  Ioannis G. Kevrekidis,et al.  Analysis of drag and virtual mass forces in bubbly suspensions using an implicit formulation of the lattice Boltzmann method , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Jean-François Cornet,et al.  Hydrodynamics influence on light conversion in photobioreactors: An energetically consistent analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Comparative evaluation of compact photobioreactors for large-scale monoculture of microalgae , 1999 .

[15]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Computational flow modelling and design of bubble column reactors , 2001 .

[16]  Clemens Posten,et al.  Simulations of light intensity variation in photobioreactors. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Dynamic simulation of bubbly flow in bubble columns , 1999 .

[18]  Muthanna H. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Local characteristics of hydrodynamics in draft tube airlift bioreactor , 2008 .

[19]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Numerical simulation of bubble columns flows: effect of different breakup and coalescence closures , 2005 .

[20]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Gas—liquid flow in bubble columns and loop reactors: Part II. Comparison of detailed experiments and flow simulations , 1994 .

[21]  Daniele Marchisio,et al.  On the Comparison between Population Balance Models for CFD Simulation of Bubble Columns , 2005 .

[22]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Numerical investigation of gas‐driven flow in 2‐D bubble columns , 2000 .

[23]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Applicability of the standard k–ε turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble columns. Part II:: Comparison of detailed experiments and flow simulations , 1999 .

[24]  Jose C. Merchuk,et al.  Comparison of photobioreactors for cultivation of the red microalga Porphyridium sp , 2000 .

[25]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Gas—liquid flow in bubble columns and loop reactors: Part I. Detailed modelling and numerical simulation , 1994 .

[26]  van Wpm Wim Swaaij,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to gas-liquid contactors. , 1997 .

[27]  Giancarlo Baldi,et al.  Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Multiphase Flow in Bubble Columns , 2002 .

[28]  Hallvard F. Svendsen,et al.  Modeling of Vertical Bubble-Driven Flows , 1997 .

[29]  M. Bertodano Two fluid model for two-phase turbulent jets , 1998 .

[30]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[31]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas-liquid two phase flow using a discrete bubble model. , 1996 .

[32]  Muthanna H. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Macro-mixing in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor , 2008 .

[33]  Muthanna H. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Local gas holdup in a draft tube airlift bioreactor , 2010 .

[34]  E. Molina Grima,et al.  Analysis of photobioreactors for culturing high-value microalgae and cyanobacteria via an advanced diagnostic technique: CARPT , 2003 .

[35]  M. Janssen,et al.  Cultivation of microalgae: effect of light/dark cycles on biomass yield , 2002 .

[36]  R. F. Mudde,et al.  2D and 3D simulations of an internal airlift loop reactor on the basis of a two-fluid model , 2001 .

[37]  H. Wagner,et al.  Hydrodynamic simulations of laboratory scale bubble columns fundamental studies of the Eulerian–Eulerian modelling approach , 1999 .

[38]  Lilly,et al.  Reactor heterogeneity with saccharopolyspora erythraea airlift fermentations , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  M. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Analyzing and modeling of photobioreactors by combining first principles of physiology and hydrodynamics , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[40]  T. B. Anderson,et al.  Fluid Mechanical Description of Fluidized Beds. Equations of Motion , 1967 .

[41]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  A circulation cell model for bubble columns , 1979 .

[42]  Dieter Mewes,et al.  Calculation of flow fields in two and three-phase bubble columns considering mass transfer , 2005 .

[43]  Y. Sato,et al.  Liquid velocity distribution in two-phase bubble flow , 1975 .

[44]  Albert Renken,et al.  Sodium compounds as catalysts for methanol dehydrogenation to water-free formaldehyde , 1990 .

[45]  D. Drew Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow , 1983 .

[46]  Jose C. Merchuk,et al.  A model integrating fluid dynamics in photosynthesis and photoinhibition processes , 2001 .

[47]  N. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Shapes and velocities of single drops and bubbles moving freely through immiscible liquids. , 1976 .

[48]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  CFD simulation of bubble column reactors: importance of drag force formulation , 1999 .