Normal and risky driving patterns identification in clear and rainy weather on freeway segments using vehicle kinematics trajectories and time series cluster analysis

ABSTRACT Enhancing traffic safety on freeways is the main goal for all transportation agencies. However, to achieve this goal, many analysis protocols of network screening models need to be improved through considering human factors while analyzing traffic data. This paper introduces one on the new analysis protocol of identifying and discriminating between normal and risky driving in clear and rainy weather. The introduced analysis protocol will consider the effect of human factors on updating the networking screening process of identifying hotspots of crash risk. This paper employs the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) data to investigate the behavior of normal and risky driving under both rainy and clear weather conditions. Near-crash events on freeways, which were used as Surrogate Measure of Safety (SMoS) for crash risk, were identified based on the changes in vehicle kinematics, including speed, longitudinal and lateral acceleration and deceleration rates, and yaw rates. Through a trajectory-level data analysis, there were significant differences in driving patterns between rainy and clear weather conditions; factors that affected crash risk mainly included driver reaction and response time, their evasive maneuvers such as changes in acceleration rates and yaw rates, and lane-changing maneuvers. A cluster analysis method was employed to classify driving patterns into two clusters: normal and risky driving condition patterns, respectively. Statistical results showed that risky driving patterns started on average one second earlier in rainy weather conditions than in clear weather conditions. Furthermore, risky driving patterns extended in average three seconds in rainy weather conditions, while it was two seconds in clear weather conditions. The identification of these patterns is considered as a primary step towards an automated development that would distinguish between different driving patterns in a Connected Vehicle CV environment using Basic Safety Messages (BSM) and to enhance the network screening analysis for increased crash risk hotspots.

[1]  Hong Yang,et al.  Use of real-world connected vehicle data in identifying high-risk locations based on a new surrogate safety measure. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Katja Vogel,et al.  A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Mohamed M. Ahmed,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Fog on Freeway Speed Selection using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[4]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Introduction to Data Mining , 2022, Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications.

[5]  Katja Vogel WHAT CHARACTERIZES A "FREE VEHICLE" IN AN URBAN AREA? , 2002 .

[6]  Shubhayu Saha,et al.  Adverse weather conditions and fatal motor vehicle crashes in the United States, 1994-2012 , 2016, Environmental Health.

[7]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  Mohamed M Ahmed,et al.  Real-time assessment of fog-related crashes using airport weather data: a feasibility analysis. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  J. Andrey,et al.  Weather as a Chronic Hazard for Road Transportation in Canadian Cities , 2003 .

[10]  Hesham Eldeeb,et al.  Driver Performance and Behavior in Adverse Weather Conditions: An Investigation Using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data—Phase 2 , 2015 .

[11]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[13]  S Yagar,et al.  A temporal analysis of rain-related crash risk. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Detecting deviation from normal driving using SHRP2 NDS data , 2017 .

[15]  A. Sapkota,et al.  Frequency of extreme weather events and increased risk of motor vehicle collision in Maryland. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Shaun S. Wulff,et al.  Detection of critical safety events on freeways in clear and rainy weather using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: Parametric and non-parametric techniques , 2019, Safety Science.

[17]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for policymakers , 2007 .

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[19]  F Mannering,et al.  Effect of roadway geometrics and environmental factors on rural freeway accident frequencies. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Behram Wali,et al.  Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles , 2017, 1808.07014.

[22]  D. Eisenberg The mixed effects of precipitation on traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .