Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?

In this study, we attempt to fill an important gap that literature has yet to investigate, that is, the influence of collaboration network structure on national research and development (R&D) efficiency. We not only provide country-level evidence that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D result performance measured by output quantity. We also prove that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D process performance measured by input–output efficiency score. The latter exploration presents the underlying explanations for the former conclusion. We construct a unique dataset that enables us to build seven scientific collaboration networks at the country level. Based on the collections of R&D data for each country in our networks, we have measured R&D efficiency scores by using the Malmquist productivity index associated with data envelopment analysis. The clustering coefficient (CC), structural holes (SH), degree centrality (DC), closeness centrality (CNC), and betweenness centrality (BC) of each country are jointly used to comprehensively measure the structural properties of collaboration networks. Panel data models are employed to explore the effect of the network properties on R&D efficiency. Our results not only reconfirm that collaboration network structure influences scientific publications at the country level, but also show that the higher SH, DC, CNC, and BC correlate positively with the better future efficiency.

[1]  Yuosre F. Badir,et al.  Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan , 2012, Scientometrics.

[2]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of small world on patent productivity in China , 2013, Scientometrics.

[3]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[4]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation , 2014 .

[6]  Peter ErdiKinga Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network , 2013 .

[7]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[8]  L. G. Soete,et al.  The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  Lorenzo Bizzi,et al.  The Dark Side of Structural Holes , 2013 .

[10]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[11]  Lorenzo Bizzi,et al.  Think different? An investigation of network antecedents and performance consequences of creativity as deviation , 2012 .

[12]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[13]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[14]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[15]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[16]  Cristina Sousa,et al.  Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties , 2012 .

[17]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[18]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[19]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[20]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations , 2010 .

[21]  Richard J. Harris A primer of multivariate statistics , 1975 .

[22]  Allan Afuah Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct , 2013 .

[23]  K. Rost The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[24]  D. King The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[25]  R. Shephard Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[26]  Jingjing Zhang,et al.  The impact of multilevel networks on innovation , 2015 .

[27]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[28]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ , 2007 .

[29]  A. Nerkar,et al.  The Impact of Global and Local Cohesion on Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2012 .

[30]  M. Feldman,et al.  The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography , 2011 .

[31]  Giuditta De Prato,et al.  Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[32]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[33]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university , 2009 .

[34]  T. Coelli RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FRONTIER MODELLING AND EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT , 1995 .

[35]  David M. Drukker,et al.  Testing for Serial Correlation in Linear Panel-data Models , 2003 .

[36]  Péter Érdi,et al.  Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network , 2012, Scientometrics.

[37]  A. van de Rijt,et al.  Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[39]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[40]  U. Cantner,et al.  International research networks in pharmaceuticals: Structure and dynamics , 2014 .

[41]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[42]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981-2002 , 2008 .

[44]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  A. Karamanos,et al.  Leveraging Micro‐ and Macro‐Structures of Embeddedness in Alliance Networks for Exploratory Innovation in Biotechnology , 2012 .

[46]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change , 2012, Scientometrics.

[47]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[50]  Yuqiang Feng,et al.  A measure of authors’ centrality in co-authorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships , 2009, Scientometrics.

[51]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[52]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Embeddedness of Networks: Institutions, Structural Holes, and Innovativeness in the Fuel Cell Industry , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[54]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators , 1997, Scientometrics.

[55]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  The Innovation-Economic Growth Nexus: Global Evidence , 2010 .

[56]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[57]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling macro-R&D production frontier performance: an application to Chinese province-level R&D , 2009, Scientometrics.

[58]  Gino Cattani,et al.  The Relational Antecedents of Project-Entrepreneurship: Network Centrality, Team Composition and Project Performance , 2009 .

[59]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[60]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[61]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[62]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[63]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Network Theory , 2013 .

[64]  M. Becker,et al.  Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model , 1970 .

[65]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[66]  Jeongsik Jay Lee,et al.  Heterogeneity, Brokerage and Innovative Performance: Endogenous Formation of Collaborative Inventor Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[67]  Hugo Hollanders,et al.  Measuring innovation efficiency , 2007 .

[68]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks , 2010 .

[69]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[70]  Jiang He,et al.  Is Inventors Network Structure a Predictor of Cluster Evolution? , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[71]  Mingting Kou,et al.  Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: a two-step analytical procedure , 2014 .

[72]  A. Varga,et al.  Research productivity and the quality of interregional knowledge networks , 2013 .

[73]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Opening the Black Box , 2004 .

[74]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The Core‐Peripheral Structure of International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citation Data , 2016 .

[75]  Ricky Leung,et al.  Networks as sponges: International collaboration for developing nanomedicine in China , 2013 .

[76]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[77]  Claudio Cruz-Cázares,et al.  You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency☆ , 2013 .

[78]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[79]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the Efficiency of China's Regional Innovation Systems: Application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) , 2012 .

[80]  M. Becerra,et al.  Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock‐performance relationship , 2015 .

[81]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[82]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[83]  G. Davis Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[84]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[85]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[86]  Wen-Chi Hung,et al.  An international comparison of relative contributions to academic productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.

[87]  A. Shipilov Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks , 2006 .

[88]  Andrea Schiffauerova,et al.  Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada , 2013, Scientometrics.

[89]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[90]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[91]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[92]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[93]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[94]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Patent collaboration and international knowledge flow , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[95]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  On the efficiency of national innovation systems , 2003 .

[96]  David M. Gould,et al.  The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth , 1996 .

[97]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[98]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  The impact of network embeddedness on research output , 2013 .

[99]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[100]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[101]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[102]  Ying He,et al.  Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages , 2007, Scientometrics.

[103]  Srikanth Paruchuri,et al.  Intraorganizational Networks, Interorganizational Networks, and the Impact of Central Inventors: A Longitudinal Study of Pharmaceutical Firms , 2010, Organ. Sci..