Somatosensory fovea in the star‐nosed mole: Behavioral use of the star in relation to innervation patterns and cortical representation

Eleven fleshy appendages, or rays, surround each of the nostrils of the star‐nosed mole. Each ray is covered with tactile sensory organs, and each ray is represented in the cortex by a stripe of tissue visible in brain sections processed for cytochrome oxidase. Here we report that the 11th, ventral ray is the behavioral focus of the nose. This ray is preferentially used to explore prey items by touch, in a behavior pattern similar to the use of a fovea in the visual system. After prey is first contacted with any nasal ray, subsequent touches are centered on the 11th ray. Although the 11th ray is small and has relatively few sensory organs on its surface, it has the largest cortical representation, greatest area of cortex per sensory organ, and the highest innervation density per sensory organ. In addition, the average area of cortex per primary afferent is highest for this ray. We refer to the differential magnification of first‐order afferents in the cortical representation as “afferent magnification.” The patterns of both cortical magnification (cortical area per sensory organ) and afferent magnification (cortical area per afferent) of the rays correlated highly with the distribution of touches across the nose scored from videotaped behavior. A simple model of star‐nosed mole behavior predicts the distribution of touches across the rays and also correlates highly with both the actual pattern of behavior and the patterns of cortical magnification observed. J. Comp. Neurol. 387:215–233, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J M Allman,et al.  Magnification in striate cortex and retinal ganglion cell layer of owl monkey: a quantitative comparison , 1977, Science.

[2]  N Suga,et al.  Disproportionate tonotopic representation for processing CF-FM sonar signals in the mustache bat auditory cortex. , 1976, Science.

[3]  J. Kaas,et al.  Variability in hand surface representations in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  G. Neuweiler,et al.  Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system , 1980 .

[5]  H. Killackey,et al.  The sensitive period in the development of the trigeminal system of the neonatal rat , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  K. Catania,et al.  Structure and innervation of the sensory organs on the snout of the star‐nosed mole , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Crossmodal changes in the somatosensory vibrissa/barrel system of visually deprived animals. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Peters Number of Neurons and Synapses in Primary Visual Cortex , 1987 .

[9]  J. Kaas,et al.  The mole nose instructs the brain. , 1997, Somatosensory & motor research.

[10]  J. Kaas,et al.  Magnification, receptive-field area, and "hypercolumn" size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  D Purves,et al.  Effects of increased neural activity on brain growth. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  E. Gould,et al.  Function of the star in the star-nosed mole, Condylura cristata , 1993 .

[13]  C. Cherniak The Bounded Brain: Toward Quantitative Neuroanatomy , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Alterations of the cortical representation of the rat ventrum induced by nursing behavior , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  L E White,et al.  Differential metabolic and electrical activity in the somatic sensory cortex of juvenile and adult rats , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Wong-Riley,et al.  Quantitative light and electron microscopic analysis of cytochrome oxidase‐rich zones in the striate cortex of the squirrel monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  R S Erzurumlu,et al.  Development of order in the rat trigeminal system , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  T. Woolsey,et al.  A proportional relationship between peripheral innervation density and cortical neuron number in the somatosensory system of the mouse , 1975, Brain Research.

[19]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Overrepresentation of the central visual field in the superior colliculus of the pigmented and albino ferret , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  E. Welker,et al.  Quantitative correlation between barrel-field size and the sensory innervation of the whiskerpad: a comparative study in six strains of mice bred for different patterns of mystacial vibrissae , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Malpeli,et al.  The representation of the visual field in the lateral geniculate nucleus of Macaca mulatta , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  Jon H. Kaas,et al.  THE UNUSUAL NOSE AND BRAIN OF THE STAR-NOSED MOLE : A STAR IN THE BRAIN , 1996 .

[23]  J. Kaas,et al.  Organization of the somatosensory cortex of the star‐nosed mole , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  K. Catania Ultrastructure of the Eimer's organ of the star‐nosed mole , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  N. Drasdo The neural representation of visual space , 1977, Nature.

[27]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Loos,et al.  Does the skin tell the somatosensory cortex how to construct a map of the periphery? , 1978, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  W M Jenkins,et al.  Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .

[31]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  B. Boycott,et al.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina , 1989, Nature.

[33]  R. Pascher,et al.  Heterogeneity in the columnar number of neurons in different neocortical areas in the rat , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  Jon H. Kaas,et al.  Deactivation and reactivation of somatosensory cortex after dorsal spinal cord injury , 1997, Nature.

[35]  D. Purves,et al.  Growth of the rat somatic sensory cortex and its constituent parts during postnatal development , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Kaas Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  K. Catania Magnified cortex in star-nosed moles , 1995, Nature.

[39]  A. Cowey,et al.  Preferential representation of the fovea in the primary visual cortex , 1993, Nature.

[40]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.