Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing

Centre–surround receptive field organization is a ubiquitous property in mammalian visual systems, presumably tailored for extracting image features that are differentially distributed over space. In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interactions between centre and surround regions of the receptive fields of many direction-selective neurons in visual cortex. In a series of psychophysical experiments we make the counterintuitive observation that increasing the size of a high-contrast moving pattern renders its direction of motion more difficult to perceive and reduces its effectiveness as an adaptation stimulus. We propose that this is a perceptual correlate of centre–surround antagonism, possibly within a population of neurons in the middle temporal visual area. The spatial antagonism of motion signals observed at high contrast gives way to spatial summation as contrast decreases. Evidently, integration of motion signals over space depends crucially on the visibility of those signals, thereby allowing the visual system to register motion information efficiently and adaptively.

[1]  Q. Zaidi,et al.  Effect of spatial configuration on motion aftereffects. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  H. Egeth,et al.  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  Function of center-surround antagonism for motion in visual area MT/V5: a modeling study , 2001, Vision Research.

[4]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Richard B Buxton,et al.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas , 2001, Vision Research.

[6]  G. Westheimer Spatial interaction in human cone vision , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Movshon,et al.  Chromatic properties of neurons in macaque MT , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[9]  T. Albright,et al.  Contribution of area MT to perception of three-dimensional shape: a computational study , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Born,et al.  Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT Effects of Microstimulation on Eye Movements , 2000, Neuron.

[12]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  High-Level Motion Processing , 1998 .

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recording of steadystate visual evoked cortical activity , 2005, Brain Topography.

[18]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  A. Derrington,et al.  Failure of motion discrimination at high contrasts: Evidence for saturation , 1989, Vision Research.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[22]  Dirk C. Mattfeld,et al.  A Computational Study , 1996 .

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Equiluminance: spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  G. Orban,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Combining steady‐state visual evoked potentials and f MRI to localize brain activity during selective attention , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[26]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  G. Orban,et al.  Shape and Spatial Distribution of Receptive Fields and Antagonistic Motion Surrounds in the Middle Temporal Area (V5) of the Macaque , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. Juola,et al.  Evidence for Distinct Attentional Bottlenecks in Attention Switching and Attentional Blink Tasks , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[31]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[32]  Lin Liu,et al.  Modeling the Surround of MT Cells and Their Selectivity for Surface Orientation in Depth Specified by Motion , 1998, Neural Computation.

[33]  D. Kiper,et al.  Chromatic properties of neurons in macaque area V2 , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Neural Correlates of Chromatic Motion Perception , 2001, Neuron.

[35]  A. Watson,et al.  The optimal motion stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[36]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Perceived visual speed constrained by image segmentation , 1996, Nature.

[37]  P. Siple,et al.  Spatial constraints on the voluntary control of attention across visual space. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[38]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: center-surround interactions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[41]  P. Lennie,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[42]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatial attention has different effects on the magno- and parvocellular pathways. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[45]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  H. Jones,et al.  Surround suppression in primate V1. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[51]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[52]  Eka Swadiansa The hypothesis , 1990 .

[53]  R. Born,et al.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area , 1993, Nature.

[54]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[55]  E. Todorov,et al.  A local circuit approach to understanding integration of long-range inputs in primary visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[57]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[58]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[59]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory. , 1986, Psychological review.

[60]  M Eimer,et al.  Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[61]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.