Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information‐rich virtual environments

This paper describes our recent experimental evaluation of Information‐Rich Virtual Environment (IRVE) interfaces. To explore the depth cue/visibility tradeoff between annotation schemes, we design and evaluate two information layout techniques to support search and comparison tasks. The techniques provide different depth and association cues between objects and their labels: labels were displayed either in the virtual world relative to their referent (Object Space) or on an image plane workspace (Viewport Space). The Software Field of View (SFOV) was controlled to 60° or 100° of vertical angle and two groups were tested: those running on a single monitor and those on a tiled nine‐panel display. Users were timed, tracked for correctness, and gave ratings for both difficulty and satisfaction on each task. Significant advantages were found for the Viewport interface, and for high SFOV. The interactions between these variables suggest special design considerations to effectively support search and comparison performance across monitor configurations and projection distortions. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[2]  Mark H. Draper,et al.  Effects of Image Scale and System Time Delay on Simulator Sickness within Head-Coupled Virtual Environments , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[4]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Designing effective multimedia presentations , 1997, CHI.

[5]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  View management for virtual and augmented reality , 2001, UIST '01.

[6]  Chris North,et al.  Information-rich virtual environments: theory, tools, and research agenda , 2003, VRST '03.

[7]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Testbed evaluation of navigation and text display techniques in an information-rich virtual environment , 2004 .

[8]  S. H. Sato,et al.  Interaction design for large displays , 1997, INTR.

[9]  Colin Ware,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Design as Applied Perception , 2003 .

[10]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.

[11]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Visualization Research with Large Displays , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Windows on the world: 2D windows for 3D augmented reality , 1993, UIST '93.

[13]  Chris North,et al.  PathSim visualizer: an Information-Rich Virtual Environment framework for systems biology , 2004, Web3D '04.

[14]  Nicholas F. Polys.  Stylesheet transformations for interactive visualization: towards a Web3D chemistry curricula , 2003, Web3D '03.

[15]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR , 1996, UIST '96.

[16]  Thomas C. Meyer,et al.  Integrating perceptual and symbolic information in VR , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments , 1997, SI3D.

[18]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Wideband displays: mitigating multiple monitor seams , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[19]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Development of chemical markup language (CML) as a system for handling complex chemical content , 2001 .

[20]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Defining Insight for Visual Analytics , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Design and display of enhancing information in desktop information-rich virtual environments: challenges and techniques , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[22]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Making contact points between text and images , 1998, MULTIMEDIA '98.

[23]  Donald P. Brutzman.  Teaching 3D modeling and simulation: virtual kelp forest case study , 2002, Web3D '02.

[24]  Renée L. Babcock,et al.  An examination of the factor structure of four of the cognitive abilities included in the educational testing service kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1997 .

[25]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .