Fluorescence photobleaching recovery in the confocal scanning light microscope

Measurement of mobilities of species in liquid systems is of great importance for understanding a number of dynamic phenomena. A well known method for measuring mobilities driven by diffusion is fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR), also known as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). New FPR recovery equations for three‐dimensional (3‐D) apertured scanning using a Gaussian approximation for the axial beam profile have been successfully developed and found to provide a solid basis for extraction of the lateral diffusion coefficient from confocal scanning light microscopy (CSLM)‐FPR experimental data. The 2‐D diffusion coefficients of fluorescent species can be successfully measured by FPR in the CSLM, which has the great advantage that bleaching can be targeted at a well‐defined volume element in bulk samples. Two‐dimensional diffusion coefficients of 45‐nm latex spheres, of FITC molecules and of a 2·45‐nm protein‐FITC complex in water‐glycerol mixtures, measured by FPR in the CSLM, are in close agreement with those calculated from the size of the diffusing species and viscosity of the medium. Diffusion coefficients as high as 2 times 10−6 cm2/s can be measured.

[1]  A. Entwistle,et al.  The use of polarization analysis in the quantification of fluorescent emission: general principles , 1992 .

[2]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[3]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[4]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Confocal scanning laser microscopy in food research: some observations. , 1987 .

[5]  P. Garland Fluorescence photobleaching recovery: control of laser intensities with an acousto-optic modulator. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[6]  I. Heertje,et al.  The Observation of the Displacement of Emulsifiers by Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy , 1990 .

[7]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching techniques to measure translational mobility in microscopic samples. , 1991, Scanning microscopy.

[8]  Kjell Carlsson,et al.  The influence of specimen refractive index, detector signal integration, and non‐uniform scan speed on the imaging properties in confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[9]  R J Cherry,et al.  Measuring diffusion coefficients of labelled particles on cell surfaces by digital fluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Biochemical Society transactions.

[10]  P. Oostveldt,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence in confocal microscopy , 1990 .

[11]  Reiner Peters,et al.  Fluorescence Photobleaching Techniques , 1991 .

[12]  E. J. V. van Zoelen,et al.  Simple computer method for evaluation of lateral diffusion coefficients from fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[13]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[14]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Fundamental and practical limits in confocal light microscopy , 1991 .

[15]  R. Cherry New Techniques of Optical Microscopy and Microspectroscopy , 1991 .

[16]  J. Yguerabide,et al.  Lateral mobility in membranes as detected by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1982, Biophysical journal.

[17]  G. Fritzsch,et al.  Complement pore genesis observed in erythrocyte membranes by fluorescence microscopic single-channel recording. , 1991, The Biochemical journal.