The multiple pathways of high performing groups: the interaction of social networks and group processes

This study examines how both strong and weak relationship groups (groups with numerous, intense internal friendship ties and few, less intense internal friendship ties respectively) achieve high performance when utilizing strategies that capitalize on the strengths and minimizing the weaknesses associated with their internal social structure. We examine the interactions of groups' internal friendship networks with their external network structures (external ties) and internal intragroup conflict (constructive controversy). The results of a study using survey, archival and interview data on 35 groups of MBA students indicated that internal friendship networks interacted with constructive controversy and external networks to determine when groups would achieve superior performance. High performing strong relationship groups engaged in greater constructive controversy than low performing strong relationship groups, while constructive controversy appeared to have minimal effect on the performance of weak relationship groups. High performing weak relationship groups had fewer external bridging ties to other groups when compared to low performing weak relationship groups, while external bridging ties appeared to have minimal effect on the performance of strong relationship groups. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. V. Valkenburg.  Network Analysis , 1964 .

[2]  P. Shah.  Network Destruction: The Structural Implications of Downsizing , 2000 .

[3]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[4]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions , 1990 .

[6]  Mario Benassi,et al.  The Dark Side of Social Capital , 1999 .

[7]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[8]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Effect of Team Building on Performance , 1999 .

[9]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences , 1993 .

[10]  S. Duck,et al.  Understanding personal relationships : an interdisciplinary approach , 1985 .

[11]  M. Heimann.  Neonatal imitation, gaze aversion, and mother-infant interaction☆ , 1989 .

[12]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Team Negotiation: An Examination of Integrative and Distributive Bargaining , 1996 .

[13]  Keith E. Davis,et al.  Friendship and love relationships. , 1982 .

[14]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[16]  A. Newcomb,et al.  Mutuality in boys' friendship relations. , 1982 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[18]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[19]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[20]  Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison,et al.  Impression Management in the Feedback-Seeking Process: A Literaturereview and Research Agenda , 1991 .

[21]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[22]  A. Newcomb,et al.  Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. , 1995 .

[23]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[24]  David L. Williams,et al.  Negotiation Process and out come of Stranger Dyads and Dating Couples: Do Lovers Lose? , 1983 .

[25]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[26]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[28]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[29]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[30]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[31]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Implications of Controversy Research for Management , 1985 .

[32]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[33]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[34]  Jin Nam Choi.  External Activities and Team Effectiveness , 2002 .

[35]  W. K. Rawlins.  NEGOTIATING CLOSE FRIENDSHIP: THE DIALECTIC OF CONJUNCTIVE FREEDOMS , 1983 .

[36]  R. Dailey.  The Effects of Cohesiveness and Collaboration on Work Groups: A Theoretical Model , 1977 .

[37]  Lynne R. Davidson,et al.  Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads , 1982 .

[38]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[39]  R. Friend,et al.  The Work Group and its Vicissitudes in Social and Industrial Psychology , 1987 .

[40]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[42]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[43]  F. Aboud.  Disagreement Between Friends , 1989 .

[44]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[45]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[46]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[48]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[49]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Team learning: collectively connecting the dots. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  F. Aboud,et al.  The Resolution of Social Conflict between Friends. , 1985 .

[51]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[52]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[53]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[54]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[55]  Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students after Twenty- Five Years. , 1968 .

[56]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[57]  B. Erickson,et al.  Corporate Social Capital and Liability , 2002 .

[58]  P. Shah,et al.  Who Are Employees' Social Referents? Using a Network Perspective to Determine Referent Others , 1998 .

[59]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[60]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .