Laboratory Codes in Nomenclature and Scientific Communication (Advancing Organism Nomenclature in Scientific Communication to Improve Research Reporting and Reproducibility).

Laboratory registration codes, also known as laboratory codes or lab codes, are a key element in standardized laboratory animal and genetic nomenclature. As such they are critical to accurate scientific communication and to research reproducibility and integrity. The original committee on Mouse Genetic Nomenclature published nomenclature conventions for mice genetics in 1940, and then conventions for inbred strains in 1952. Unique designations were needed, and have been in use since the 1950s, for the sources of animals and substrains, for the laboratories that identified new alleles or mutations, and then for developers of transgenes and induced mutations. Current laboratory codes are typically a 2- to 4-letter acronym for an institution or an investigator. Unique codes are assigned from the International Laboratory Code Registry, which was developed and is maintained by ILAR in the National Academies (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine and previously National Academy of Sciences). As a resource for the global research community, the registry has been online since 1997. Since 2003 mouse and rat genetic and strain nomenclature rules have been reviewed and updated annually as a joint effort of the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice and the Rat Genome and Nomenclature Committee. The current nomenclature conventions (particularly conventions for non-inbred animals) are applicable beyond rodents, although not widely adopted. Ongoing recognition, since at least the 1930s, of the research relevance of genetic backgrounds and origins of animals, and of spontaneous and induced genetic variants speaks to the need for broader application of standardized nomenclature for animals in research, particularly given the increasing numbers and complexities of genetically modified swine, nonhuman primates, fish, and other species.

[1]  L. Mecklenburg,et al.  Does Geographical Origin of Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) Matter in Drug Safety Assessment?: A Literature Review and Proposed Conclusion , 2022, Toxicologic pathology.

[2]  Kelsey Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Geographical Origin, Age, Sex, and Animal Husbandry on the Spontaneous Histopathology of Laboratory Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca Fascicularis): A Contemporary Global and Multisite Review of Historical Control Data , 2022, Toxicologic pathology.

[3]  Steven J. Marygold,et al.  FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features , 2022, Genetics.

[4]  Adam J. Wright,et al.  Harmonizing model organism data in the Alliance of Genome Resources , 2022, Genetics.

[5]  Y. Hamada,et al.  Population Structure of Macaca fascicularis aurea, and their Genetic Relationships with M. f. fascicularis and M. mulatta Determined by 868 RADseq‐Derived Autosomal SNPs—A consideration for biomedical research , 2021, Journal of medical primatology.

[6]  A. Kwitek,et al.  The Rat Genome Database (RGD) facilitates genomic and phenotypic data integration across multiple species for biomedical research , 2021, Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society.

[7]  Cynthia L. Smith,et al.  Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): latest news from MGD and GXD , 2021, Mammalian Genome.

[8]  Yvonne M. Bradford,et al.  Zebrafish information network, the knowledgebase for Danio rerio research , 2021, bioRxiv.

[9]  J. Fei,et al.  Gene and transgenics nomenclature for the laboratory axolotl—Ambystoma mexicanum , 2021, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[10]  C. Lawrence,et al.  A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility , 2020, Lab Animal.

[11]  Susan Tweedie,et al.  Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021 , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Ruth L. Seal,et al.  Guidelines for human gene nomenclature , 2020, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Lisa E. Gralinski,et al.  Content and Performance of the MiniMUGA Genotyping Array: A New Tool To Improve Rigor and Reproducibility in Mouse Research , 2020, Genetics.

[14]  J. Lunney,et al.  Importance of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (Swine Leukocyte Antigen) in Swine Health and Biomedical Research. , 2019, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[15]  J. Kaufman,et al.  A potential nomenclature for the Immuno Polymorphism Database (IPD) of chicken MHC genes: progress and problems , 2019, Immunogenetics.

[16]  Melinda R. Dwinell,et al.  The Year of the Rat: The Rat Genome Database at 20: a multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Paul Flicek,et al.  IPD-IMGT/HLA Database , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  C. Bult,et al.  The Alliance of Genome Resources: Building a Modern Data Ecosystem for Model Organism Databases , 2019, Genetics.

[19]  P. Parham,et al.  Nomenclature report 2019: major histocompatibility complex genes and alleles of Great and Small Ape and Old and New World monkey species , 2019, Immunogenetics.

[20]  L. Walter Nomenclature report on the major histocompatibility complex genes and alleles of the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) , 2019, Immunogenetics.

[21]  V. Võikar,et al.  Experiments done in Black-6 mice: what does it mean? , 2019, Lab Animal.

[22]  Troy J. Pells,et al.  Xenbase: Facilitating the Use of Xenopus to Model Human Disease , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[23]  E. Radaelli,et al.  Immune Relevant and Immune Deficient Mice: Options and Opportunities in Translational Research , 2018, ILAR journal.

[24]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Comparative MHC nomenclature: report from the ISAG/IUIS-VIC committee 2018 , 2018, Immunogenetics.

[25]  R. Bontrop,et al.  IPD-MHC: nomenclature requirements for the non-human major histocompatibility complex in the next-generation sequencing era , 2018, Immunogenetics.

[26]  R. Naumann,et al.  Novel insights into the genetic background of genetically modified mice , 2018, Transgenic Research.

[27]  Megan K. Mulligan,et al.  Substrain- and sex-dependent differences in stroke vulnerability in C57BL/6 mice , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  A. Varki,et al.  Striking Immune Phenotypes in Gene-Targeted Mice Are Driven by a Copy-Number Variant Originating from a Commercially Available C57BL/6 Strain. , 2016, Cell reports.

[29]  Maryann E. Martone,et al.  RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods , 2016, Neuron.

[30]  D. Fontaine,et al.  Attention to Background Strain Is Essential for Metabolic Research: C57BL/6 and the International Knockout Mouse Consortium , 2015, Diabetes.

[31]  Judith A. Blake,et al.  Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): reflecting on 25 years , 2015, Mammalian Genome.

[32]  J. Schacht,et al.  Disparities in auditory physiology and pathology between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N substrains , 2014, Hearing Research.

[33]  A. Yoshiki,et al.  Development of SNP markers for C57BL/6N-derived mouse inbred strains , 2014, Experimental animals.

[34]  N. Roll-Hansen The holist tradition in twentieth century genetics. Wilhelm Johannsen's genotype concept , 2014, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Henrik Westerberg,et al.  A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains , 2013, Genome Biology.

[36]  F. Pazos,et al.  Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains , 2011, Transgenic Research.

[37]  Judith A. Blake,et al.  The Mouse Genome Database: enhancements and updates , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  C-S Ho,et al.  Nomenclature for factors of the SLA system, update 2008. , 2009, Tissue antigens.

[39]  A. Yoshiki,et al.  Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. , 2009, Experimental animals.

[40]  Erik Segerdell,et al.  Xenbase: a Xenopus biology and genomics resource , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  F. Ashcroft,et al.  Deletion of Nicotinamide Nucleotide Transhydrogenase , 2006, Diabetes.

[42]  S. Voss,et al.  Sal-Site: Integrating new and existing ambystomatid salamander research and informational resources , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[43]  James Robinson,et al.  IPD—the Immuno Polymorphism Database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  L J Maltais,et al.  Rules and guidelines for mouse gene nomenclature: a condensed version. International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1997, Genomics.

[45]  T. Serikawa,et al.  Standardized rat genetic nomenclature , 1995, Mammalian Genome.

[46]  M. Davisson Rules and guidelines for nomenclature of mouse genes. International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1994, Gene.

[47]  M. Ashburner,et al.  FlyBase--the Drosophila genetic database. , 1994, Development.

[48]  実験動物系統ワーキンググループ Rules for Nomenclature of Inbred Strains and Genes of the Mouse , 1991 .

[49]  J. Staats Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice: eighth listing. , 1985, Cancer research.

[50]  M. Festing,et al.  Inbred strains of rats , 1981, Behavior genetics.

[51]  J. Staats Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: seventh listing for the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1980, Cancer research.

[52]  D. Rosenstreich,et al.  Genetic control of B cell activation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide is mediated by multiple distinct genes or alleles. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[53]  F Listing,et al.  Stardardized nomenclature for inbred strains of rats. , 1973, Transplantation.

[54]  M. Lyon,et al.  A REVISION OF THE STANDARDIZED GENETIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MICE. , 1963, The Journal of heredity.

[55]  L. C. Dunn,et al.  Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice Second Listing Prepared by The Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice , 1960 .

[56]  W. E. Heston,et al.  High incidence of spontaneous hepatomas and the increase of this incidence with urethan in C3H, C3Hf, and C3He male mice. , 1960, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[57]  W. Silvers,et al.  INBRED ANIMALS AND TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNITY , 1959 .

[58]  D. Grahn,et al.  Genetic Variation in the Acute Lethal Response of Four Inbred Mouse Strains to Whole Body X-Irradiation. , 1957, Genetics.

[59]  W. Lane-Petter The International Committee on Laboratory Animals , 1957, Nature.

[60]  R F KALLMAN,et al.  The influence of strain on acute x-ray lethality in the mouse. I. LD50 and death rate studies. , 1956, Radiation research.

[61]  J. J. Bittner Mammary cancer in C3H mice of different sublines and their hybrids. , 1956, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[62]  J. Staats A Classified Bibliography of Inbred Strains of Mice. , 1954, Science.

[63]  E. L. Green A skeletal difference between sublines of the C3H strain of mice. , 1953, Science.

[64]  L. C. Dunn,et al.  Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice , 1952, Nature.

[65]  L. Law MOUSE GENETICS NEWS , 1948 .

[66]  L. C. Dunn,et al.  REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON MOUSE GENETICS NOMENCLATURE , 1940 .

[67]  H. Andervont Susceptibility of mice to spontaneous, induced, and transplantable tumors. A comparative study of eight strains , 1938 .

[68]  C. Little Report of the Committee on Genetic form and Nomenclature , 1921, The American Naturalist.

[69]  O. F. Cook "GENES" NOT MADE IN GERMANY. , 1912, Science.

[70]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Bioinformatics Advances.

[71]  Troy J. Pells,et al.  Navigating Xenbase: An Integrated Xenopus Genomics and Gene Expression Database. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[72]  S. Voss,et al.  Sal-Site: research resources for the Mexican axolotl. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[73]  C. Linder Genetic variables that influence phenotype. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[74]  A. Yoshiki,et al.  Mouse phenome research: implications of genetic background. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[75]  Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice Guidelines for nomenclature of genetically determined biochemical variants in the house mouse, Mus musculus , 2004, Biochemical Genetics.

[76]  Sue Povey,et al.  Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[77]  Peter J. Tonellato,et al.  Rat Genome Database (RGD): mapping disease onto the genome , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[78]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  WormBase: network access to the genome and biology of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[79]  M. Westerfield,et al.  Zebrafish informatics and the ZFIN database. , 1999, Methods in cell biology.

[80]  Judith A. Blake,et al.  The Mouse Genome Database (MGD). A comprehensive public resource of genetic, phenotypic and genomic data. The Mouse Genome Informatics Group , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[81]  M. Festing,et al.  Inbred strains in biomedical research , 1979 .

[82]  J. Staats Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: sixth listing. , 1976, Cancer research.

[83]  R. Loosli Outbred stocks of laboratory animals: first European listing. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Versuchstierkunde.

[84]  J. Staats Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: fifth listing. , 1972, Cancer research.

[85]  M. Festing,et al.  International standardized nomenclature for outbred stocks of laboratory animals. , 1972, Zeitschrift fur Versuchstierkunde.

[86]  A. Bogdén,et al.  A nomenclatural system for outbred animals. , 1970, Laboratory animal care.

[87]  J. Staats STANDARDIZED NOMENCLATURE FOR INBRED STRAINS OF MICE. THIRD LISTING. , 1964, Cancer research.