Laboratory Codes in Nomenclature and Scientific Communication (Advancing Organism Nomenclature in Scientific Communication to Improve Research Reporting and Reproducibility).
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Mecklenburg,et al. Does Geographical Origin of Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) Matter in Drug Safety Assessment?: A Literature Review and Proposed Conclusion , 2022, Toxicologic pathology.
[2] Kelsey Johnson,et al. The Influence of Geographical Origin, Age, Sex, and Animal Husbandry on the Spontaneous Histopathology of Laboratory Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca Fascicularis): A Contemporary Global and Multisite Review of Historical Control Data , 2022, Toxicologic pathology.
[3] Steven J. Marygold,et al. FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features , 2022, Genetics.
[4] Adam J. Wright,et al. Harmonizing model organism data in the Alliance of Genome Resources , 2022, Genetics.
[5] Y. Hamada,et al. Population Structure of Macaca fascicularis aurea, and their Genetic Relationships with M. f. fascicularis and M. mulatta Determined by 868 RADseq‐Derived Autosomal SNPs—A consideration for biomedical research , 2021, Journal of medical primatology.
[6] A. Kwitek,et al. The Rat Genome Database (RGD) facilitates genomic and phenotypic data integration across multiple species for biomedical research , 2021, Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society.
[7] Cynthia L. Smith,et al. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): latest news from MGD and GXD , 2021, Mammalian Genome.
[8] Yvonne M. Bradford,et al. Zebrafish information network, the knowledgebase for Danio rerio research , 2021, bioRxiv.
[9] J. Fei,et al. Gene and transgenics nomenclature for the laboratory axolotl—Ambystoma mexicanum , 2021, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.
[10] C. Lawrence,et al. A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility , 2020, Lab Animal.
[11] Susan Tweedie,et al. Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021 , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..
[12] Ruth L. Seal,et al. Guidelines for human gene nomenclature , 2020, Nature Genetics.
[13] Lisa E. Gralinski,et al. Content and Performance of the MiniMUGA Genotyping Array: A New Tool To Improve Rigor and Reproducibility in Mouse Research , 2020, Genetics.
[14] J. Lunney,et al. Importance of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (Swine Leukocyte Antigen) in Swine Health and Biomedical Research. , 2019, Annual review of animal biosciences.
[15] J. Kaufman,et al. A potential nomenclature for the Immuno Polymorphism Database (IPD) of chicken MHC genes: progress and problems , 2019, Immunogenetics.
[16] Melinda R. Dwinell,et al. The Year of the Rat: The Rat Genome Database at 20: a multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..
[17] Paul Flicek,et al. IPD-IMGT/HLA Database , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..
[18] C. Bult,et al. The Alliance of Genome Resources: Building a Modern Data Ecosystem for Model Organism Databases , 2019, Genetics.
[19] P. Parham,et al. Nomenclature report 2019: major histocompatibility complex genes and alleles of Great and Small Ape and Old and New World monkey species , 2019, Immunogenetics.
[20] L. Walter. Nomenclature report on the major histocompatibility complex genes and alleles of the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) , 2019, Immunogenetics.
[21] V. Võikar,et al. Experiments done in Black-6 mice: what does it mean? , 2019, Lab Animal.
[22] Troy J. Pells,et al. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use of Xenopus to Model Human Disease , 2019, Front. Physiol..
[23] E. Radaelli,et al. Immune Relevant and Immune Deficient Mice: Options and Opportunities in Translational Research , 2018, ILAR journal.
[24] J. Kaufman,et al. Comparative MHC nomenclature: report from the ISAG/IUIS-VIC committee 2018 , 2018, Immunogenetics.
[25] R. Bontrop,et al. IPD-MHC: nomenclature requirements for the non-human major histocompatibility complex in the next-generation sequencing era , 2018, Immunogenetics.
[26] R. Naumann,et al. Novel insights into the genetic background of genetically modified mice , 2018, Transgenic Research.
[27] Megan K. Mulligan,et al. Substrain- and sex-dependent differences in stroke vulnerability in C57BL/6 mice , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[28] A. Varki,et al. Striking Immune Phenotypes in Gene-Targeted Mice Are Driven by a Copy-Number Variant Originating from a Commercially Available C57BL/6 Strain. , 2016, Cell reports.
[29] Maryann E. Martone,et al. RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods , 2016, Neuron.
[30] D. Fontaine,et al. Attention to Background Strain Is Essential for Metabolic Research: C57BL/6 and the International Knockout Mouse Consortium , 2015, Diabetes.
[31] Judith A. Blake,et al. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): reflecting on 25 years , 2015, Mammalian Genome.
[32] J. Schacht,et al. Disparities in auditory physiology and pathology between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N substrains , 2014, Hearing Research.
[33] A. Yoshiki,et al. Development of SNP markers for C57BL/6N-derived mouse inbred strains , 2014, Experimental animals.
[34] N. Roll-Hansen. The holist tradition in twentieth century genetics. Wilhelm Johannsen's genotype concept , 2014, The Journal of physiology.
[35] Henrik Westerberg,et al. A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains , 2013, Genome Biology.
[36] F. Pazos,et al. Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains , 2011, Transgenic Research.
[37] Judith A. Blake,et al. The Mouse Genome Database: enhancements and updates , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[38] C-S Ho,et al. Nomenclature for factors of the SLA system, update 2008. , 2009, Tissue antigens.
[39] A. Yoshiki,et al. Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. , 2009, Experimental animals.
[40] Erik Segerdell,et al. Xenbase: a Xenopus biology and genomics resource , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[41] F. Ashcroft,et al. Deletion of Nicotinamide Nucleotide Transhydrogenase , 2006, Diabetes.
[42] S. Voss,et al. Sal-Site: Integrating new and existing ambystomatid salamander research and informational resources , 2005, BMC Genomics.
[43] James Robinson,et al. IPD—the Immuno Polymorphism Database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[44] L J Maltais,et al. Rules and guidelines for mouse gene nomenclature: a condensed version. International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1997, Genomics.
[45] T. Serikawa,et al. Standardized rat genetic nomenclature , 1995, Mammalian Genome.
[46] M. Davisson. Rules and guidelines for nomenclature of mouse genes. International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1994, Gene.
[47] M. Ashburner,et al. FlyBase--the Drosophila genetic database. , 1994, Development.
[48] 実験動物系統ワーキンググループ. Rules for Nomenclature of Inbred Strains and Genes of the Mouse , 1991 .
[49] J. Staats. Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice: eighth listing. , 1985, Cancer research.
[50] M. Festing,et al. Inbred strains of rats , 1981, Behavior genetics.
[51] J. Staats. Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: seventh listing for the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. , 1980, Cancer research.
[52] D. Rosenstreich,et al. Genetic control of B cell activation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide is mediated by multiple distinct genes or alleles. , 1976, Journal of immunology.
[53] F Listing,et al. Stardardized nomenclature for inbred strains of rats. , 1973, Transplantation.
[54] M. Lyon,et al. A REVISION OF THE STANDARDIZED GENETIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MICE. , 1963, The Journal of heredity.
[55] L. C. Dunn,et al. Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice Second Listing Prepared by The Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice , 1960 .
[56] W. E. Heston,et al. High incidence of spontaneous hepatomas and the increase of this incidence with urethan in C3H, C3Hf, and C3He male mice. , 1960, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[57] W. Silvers,et al. INBRED ANIMALS AND TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNITY , 1959 .
[58] D. Grahn,et al. Genetic Variation in the Acute Lethal Response of Four Inbred Mouse Strains to Whole Body X-Irradiation. , 1957, Genetics.
[59] W. Lane-Petter. The International Committee on Laboratory Animals , 1957, Nature.
[60] R F KALLMAN,et al. The influence of strain on acute x-ray lethality in the mouse. I. LD50 and death rate studies. , 1956, Radiation research.
[61] J. J. Bittner. Mammary cancer in C3H mice of different sublines and their hybrids. , 1956, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[62] J. Staats. A Classified Bibliography of Inbred Strains of Mice. , 1954, Science.
[63] E. L. Green. A skeletal difference between sublines of the C3H strain of mice. , 1953, Science.
[64] L. C. Dunn,et al. Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice , 1952, Nature.
[65] L. Law. MOUSE GENETICS NEWS , 1948 .
[66] L. C. Dunn,et al. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON MOUSE GENETICS NOMENCLATURE , 1940 .
[67] H. Andervont. Susceptibility of mice to spontaneous, induced, and transplantable tumors. A comparative study of eight strains , 1938 .
[68] C. Little. Report of the Committee on Genetic form and Nomenclature , 1921, The American Naturalist.
[69] O. F. Cook. "GENES" NOT MADE IN GERMANY. , 1912, Science.
[70] OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Bioinformatics Advances.
[71] Troy J. Pells,et al. Navigating Xenbase: An Integrated Xenopus Genomics and Gene Expression Database. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.
[72] S. Voss,et al. Sal-Site: research resources for the Mexican axolotl. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.
[73] C. Linder. Genetic variables that influence phenotype. , 2006, ILAR journal.
[74] A. Yoshiki,et al. Mouse phenome research: implications of genetic background. , 2006, ILAR journal.
[75] Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. Guidelines for nomenclature of genetically determined biochemical variants in the house mouse, Mus musculus , 2004, Biochemical Genetics.
[76] Sue Povey,et al. Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..
[77] Peter J. Tonellato,et al. Rat Genome Database (RGD): mapping disease onto the genome , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..
[78] Paul W. Sternberg,et al. WormBase: network access to the genome and biology of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..
[79] M. Westerfield,et al. Zebrafish informatics and the ZFIN database. , 1999, Methods in cell biology.
[80] Judith A. Blake,et al. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD). A comprehensive public resource of genetic, phenotypic and genomic data. The Mouse Genome Informatics Group , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..
[81] M. Festing,et al. Inbred strains in biomedical research , 1979 .
[82] J. Staats. Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: sixth listing. , 1976, Cancer research.
[83] R. Loosli. Outbred stocks of laboratory animals: first European listing. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Versuchstierkunde.
[84] J. Staats. Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: fifth listing. , 1972, Cancer research.
[85] M. Festing,et al. International standardized nomenclature for outbred stocks of laboratory animals. , 1972, Zeitschrift fur Versuchstierkunde.
[86] A. Bogdén,et al. A nomenclatural system for outbred animals. , 1970, Laboratory animal care.
[87] J. Staats. STANDARDIZED NOMENCLATURE FOR INBRED STRAINS OF MICE. THIRD LISTING. , 1964, Cancer research.