Assessment of rotatory laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees using magnetic resonance imaging with Porto-knee testing device

PurposeObjective evaluation of both antero-posterior translation and rotatory laxity of the knee remains a target to be accomplished. This is true for both preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of different ACL reconstruction emerging techniques. The ideal measurement tool should be simple, accurate and reproducible, while enabling to assess both “anatomy” and “function” during the same examination. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new in-house-developed testing device, the so-called Porto-knee testing device (PKTD). The PKTD is aimed to be used on the evaluation of both antero-posterior and rotatory laxity of the knee during MRI exams.MethodsBetween 2008 and 2010, 33 patients with ACL-deficient knees were enrolled for the purpose of this study. All patients were evaluated in the office and under anesthesia with Lachman test, lateral pivot-shift test and anterior drawer test. All cases were studied preoperatively with KT-1000 and MRI with PKTD, and examinations performed by independent observers blinded for clinical evaluation. During MRI, we have used a PKTD that applies antero-posterior translation and permits free tibial rotation through a standardized pressure (46.7 kPa) in the proximal posterior region of the leg. Measurements were taken for both knees and comparing side-to-side. Five patients with partial ruptures were excluded from the group of 33.ResultsFor the 28 remaining patients, 3 women and 25 men, with mean age of 33.4 ± 9.4 years, 13 left and 15 right knees were tested. No significant correlation was noticed for Lachman test and PKTD results (n.s.). Pivot-shift had a strong positive correlation with the difference in anterior translation registered in lateral and medial tibia plateaus of injured knees (cor. coefficient = 0.80; p < 0.05), and with the difference in this parameter as compared to side-to-side (cor. coefficient = 0.83; p < 0.05).Considering the KT-1000 difference between injured and healthy knees, a very strong positive correlation was found for side-to-side difference in medial (cor. coefficient = 0.73; p < 0.05) and lateral (cor. coefficient = 0.5; p < 0.05) tibial plateau displacement using PKTD.ConclusionThe PKTD proved to be a reliable tool in assessment of antero-posterior translation (comparing with KT-1000) and rotatory laxity (compared with lateral pivot-shift under anesthesia) of the ACL-deficient knee during MRI examination.Level of evidenceTherapeutic studies, Level IV.

[1]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Rotational knee laxity: Reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[2]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Re: Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Kyle Anderson,et al.  All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  F. Handelberg,et al.  The role of the Rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees , 2004, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Diagnosis of isolated posterolateral bundle tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  M. Strobel,et al.  Reliability of Stress Radiography for Evaluation of Posterior Knee Laxity , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Knee Rotational Laxity in a Randomized Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  D. Theisen,et al.  Reliability testing of a new device to measure tibial rotation , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  P. Chambat,et al.  Arthroscopic identification of the anterior cruciate ligament posterolateral bundle: the figure-of-four position. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  N. Adachi,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[11]  J. Andrews,et al.  Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part I. The medial compartment and cruciate ligaments. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  V. Musahl,et al.  Mechanized pivot shift test achieves greater accuracy than manual pivot shift test , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  J W Katz,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries , 1986, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  B. Gagnière,et al.  A new knee arthrometer, the GNRB: experience in ACL complete and partial tears. , 2009, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[15]  P Boyer,et al.  [Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees]. , 2004, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[16]  T. A. Blackburn,et al.  Classification of knee ligament instabilities. , 1980, Physical therapy.

[17]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Rotatory Instability after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  N. Sobol,et al.  Preliminary results , 2020, Asymptotic Analysis of Random Walks: Light-Tailed Distributions.

[19]  G. Poehling,et al.  Understanding ACL research requires patience and persistence. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  Partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: injury patterns on MR imaging , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  A. Pearle,et al.  The pivot shift. , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[22]  J. Kidder,et al.  Selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears: a series of 36 patients with mean 24 months follow-up , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  R. Hube,et al.  Validation of a measurement device for instrumented quantification of anterior translation and rotational assessment of the knee. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[24]  William I. Sterett,et al.  Relationships between Objective Assessment of Ligament Stability and Subjective Assessment of Symptoms and Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  M. Hashizume,et al.  Assessment of Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee Using an Open Magnetic Resonance Imaging System , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  R. Mascarenhas,et al.  Current Concepts in Instrumented Knee-Laxity Testing , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  S. Woo,et al.  Evaluation of knee stability with use of a robotic system. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  T. Branch,et al.  Instrumented examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: minimizing flaws of the manual clinical examination. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[29]  C Jardin,et al.  Fiabilité de l'arthromètre KT-1000 pour la mesure de la laxité antérieure du genou: analyse comparative avec le Telos de 48 reconstructions du ligament croisé antérieur et reproductibilité intra- et interobservateurs , 1999 .

[30]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[31]  D. Daniel,et al.  Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption , 1985, The American journal of sports medicine.

[32]  M. Lind,et al.  The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[33]  M. Marcacci,et al.  New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[34]  M. Hashizume,et al.  Comparison of Rotatory Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Between Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Techniques , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  A. Pearle,et al.  A mechanized and standardized pivot shifter: technical description and first evaluation , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.