Habitat-Specific Population Growth of a Farmland Bird

Background To assess population persistence of species living in heterogeneous landscapes, the effects of habitat on reproduction and survival have to be investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings We used a matrix population model to estimate habitat-specific population growth rates for a population of northern wheatears Oenanthe oenanthe breeding in farmland consisting of a mosaic of distinct habitat (land use) types. Based on extensive long-term data on reproduction and survival, habitats characterised by tall field layers (spring- and autumn-sown crop fields, ungrazed grasslands) displayed negative stochastic population growth rates (log λs: −0.332, −0.429, −0.168, respectively), that were markedly lower than growth rates of habitats characterised by permanently short field layers (pastures grazed by cattle or horses, and farmyards, log λs: −0.056, +0.081, −0.059). Although habitats differed with respect to reproductive performance, differences in habitat-specific population growth were largely due to differences in adult and first-year survival rates, as shown by a life table response experiment (LTRE). Conclusions/Significance Our results show that estimation of survival rates is important for realistic assessments of habitat quality. Results also indicate that grazed grasslands and farmyards may act as source habitats, whereas crop fields and ungrazed grasslands with tall field layers may act as sink habitats. We suggest that the strong decline of northern wheatears in Swedish farmland may be linked to the corresponding observed loss of high quality breeding habitat, i.e. grazed semi-natural grasslands.

[1]  B. Doligez,et al.  Estimating fitness consequences of dispersal: a road to 'know-where'? Non-random dispersal and the underestimation of dispersers' fitness. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  A. Tye.  Assessment of territory quality and its effects on breeding success in a migrant passerine, the Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe , 2008 .

[3]  T. Pärt,et al.  Post-breeding information gathering and breeding territory shifts in northern wheatears. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[4]  Debora Arlt,et al.  Nonideal breeding habitat selection: a mismatch between preference and fitness. , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  Å. Lindström,et al.  Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification , 2006 .

[6]  GARY C. WHITE,et al.  Multistate Survival Models and Their Extensions in Program MARK , 2006 .

[7]  E. Belda,et al.  Importance of adult survival, local recruitment and immigration in a declining boreal forest passerine, the willow tit Parus montanus , 2006, Oecologia.

[8]  G. S. Olson,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE OF NORTHERN SPOTTED OWLS IN SOUTHERN OREGON , 2005 .

[9]  D. Winkler,et al.  The natal dispersal of tree swallows in a continuous mainland environment , 2005 .

[10]  J. Battin.  When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal Populations , 2004 .

[11]  T. Benton,et al.  The effect of sward height and drainage on Common Starlings Sturnus vulgaris and Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus foraging in grassland habitats , 2004 .

[12]  Oscar E. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations , 2004 .

[13]  Ian Newton,et al.  The recent declines of farmland bird populations in britain : An appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions , 2004 .

[14]  D. Doak,et al.  Buffering of Life Histories against Environmental Stochasticity: Accounting for a Spurious Correlation between the Variabilities of Vital Rates and Their Contributions to Fitness , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[15]  W. Kristan.  The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source -sink systems and ecological traps , 2003 .

[16]  J. Ehrlén.  Fitness Components versus Total Demographic Effects: Evaluating Herbivore Impacts on a Perennial Herb , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[18]  H. Smith,et al.  The effect of pasture on starling (Sturnus vulgaris) breeding success and population density in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape in southern Sweden , 2002 .

[19]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirements to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain , 2002 .

[20]  T. Pärt.  Experimental evidence of environmental effects on age–specific reproductive success: the importance of resource quality , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Pärt.  The effects of territory quality on age-dependent reproductive performance in the northern wheatear, Oenanthe oenanthe , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  F. Thompson,et al.  MODELING THE ECOLOGICAL TRAP HYPOTHESIS: A HABITAT AND DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR MIGRANT SONGBIRDS , 2001 .

[23]  M. T. Murphy.  Habitat-specific demography of a long-distance, neotropical migrant bird, the eastern kingbird , 2001 .

[24]  R. Green,et al.  Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  CLIMATE, HABITAT QUALITY, AND FITNESS IN NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL POPULATIONS IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA , 2000 .

[26]  J. Scheirs,et al.  Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  D. Harper,et al.  Effects of agricultural intensification on the breeding success of corn buntings Miliaria calandra , 2000 .

[28]  B. Sæther,et al.  AVIAN LIFE HISTORY VARIATION AND CONTRIBUTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRAITS TO THE POPULATION GROWTH RATE , 2000 .

[29]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics with confidence. 2nd edition , 2000 .

[30]  Bruce E. Kendall,et al.  ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY IN SURVIVORSHIP DATA , 1998 .

[31]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  On the evolutionary stability of sink populations , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[32]  Stephen J. Browne,et al.  Territory distribution and breeding success of skylarks Alauda arvensis on organic and intensive farmland in southern England , 1997 .

[33]  Richard T. Holmes,et al.  SITE-DEPENDENT REGULATION OF POPULATION SIZE:A NEW SYNTHESIS , 1997 .

[34]  Peter P. Marra,et al.  Habitat-specific demography of breeding black-throated blue warblers (Dendroica caerulescens) : implications for populations dynamics , 1996 .

[35]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[36]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Estimation of Individual Fitness from Life-History Data , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[37]  M. Bowers.  Dynamics of age- and habitat-structured populations , 1994 .

[38]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[39]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[40]  F. Vuilleumier.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume V: Tyrant Flycatchers to Thrushes , 1990 .

[41]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[42]  G. A. Parker,et al.  Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[44]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[45]  Jerram L. Brown.  The Buffer Effect and Productivity in Tit Populations , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[46]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[47]  M. Clarka,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in avian life history traits and consequences for population growth , 2007 .

[48]  A. M. Pidgeona,et al.  Contrasting measures of fitness to classify habitat quality for the black-throated sparrow ( Amphispiza bilineata ) , 2006 .

[49]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Is fledging success a reliable index of fitness in Northern Goshawks , 2005 .

[50]  T. Kawecki.  Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Source-Sink Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[51]  I. Burfield,et al.  Birds in Europe : population estimates, trends and conservation status , 2004 .

[52]  William F. Morris,et al.  Quantitative conservation biology , 2002 .

[53]  M. Smithson.  Statistics with confidence , 2000 .

[54]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[55]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks , 1995 .

[56]  O. Debruijn,et al.  Population ecology and conservation of the barn owl Tyto alba in farmland habitats in Liemers and Achterhoek (The Netherlands) , 1994 .

[57]  Gregory J. Davis,et al.  The demographic significance of ‘sink’ populations , 1991 .

[58]  P. A. Wing,et al.  Yearbook of agricultural statistics , 1969 .

[59]  M. DavidW.,et al.  The ecology of weasels ( Mustela nivalis ) on mixed farmland in southern England , 2022 .