Increasing X-ray image interpretation competency of cargo security screeners

Abstract X-ray screening of containers and unit load devices in the area of cargo shipping is becoming an essential and common feature at ports and airports all over the world. The detection of prohibited items in X-ray images is a challenging task for screening officers as they need to know which items are prohibited and what they look like in X-ray images. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether X-ray image interpretation competency of cargo security screeners can be increased by computer-based training. More specifically, effects of training were investigated by conducting tests before training started and after approximately three months of training. Moreover, it was examined whether viewing X-ray images in pseudo color would lead to a better detection performance compared to when X-ray images are shown in greyscale. Recurrent computer-based training resulted in large performance increases after three months. No significant difference in detection performance could be found for tests when using X-ray images in greyscale vs. pseudo color. Relevance to industry Cargo X-ray screening is becoming a common feature at ports and airports. The identification and detection of prohibited items in X-ray images highly depends on human operators and their competences regarding X-ray image interpretation. Thus, research on appropriate training methods and enhancements of the human factor are essential to achieve and maintain high levels of security.

[1]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  How Image Based Factors and Human Factors Contribute to Threat Detection Performance in X-Ray Aviation Security Screening , 2008, USAB.

[2]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Evaluation and selection of airport security screeners. , 2011 .

[3]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Human and organizational factors in security screening and inspection systems: conceptual framework and key research needs , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[4]  R. F. Eilbert,et al.  X-ray Technologies , 2009 .

[5]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Objekterkennung und Signaldetektion , 2005 .

[6]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Human-machine interaction in x-ray screening , 2009, 43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  The role of recurrent CBT for increasing aviation security screeners’ visual knowledge and abilities needed in x-ray screening , 2006 .

[9]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Airport security human factors: From the weakest to the strongest link in airport security screening. , 2006 .

[10]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Airport Security Screener Competency: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Aviation Security Screeners Visual Abilities & Visual Knowledge Measurement , 2005 .

[12]  Douglas H. Harris,et al.  How to Really Improve Airport Security , 2002 .

[13]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[14]  Doris Aaronson,et al.  Extensions of Grier's computational formulas for A' and B'' to below-chance performance. , 1987 .

[15]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  One year later: how screener performance improves in x-ray luggage search with computer-based training. , 2009 .

[16]  Adrian Schwaninger Computer based training: a powerful tool to the enhancement of human factors. , 2011 .

[17]  B.A. Klock,et al.  Test and evaluation report for X-ray detection of threats using different X-ray functions , 2005, Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[18]  A. Schwaninger,et al.  Adaptive Computer-Based Training Increases on the Job Performance of X-Ray Screeners , 2007, 2007 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[19]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Evaluation of CBT for increasing threat detection performance in X-ray screening , 2004 .

[20]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  A. Schwaninger,et al.  Measuring visual abilities and visual knowledge of aviation security screeners , 2004, 38th Annual 2004 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, 2004..

[22]  A. Schwaninger,et al.  Computer-Based Training Increases Efficiency in X-Ray Image Interpretation by Aviation Security Screeners , 2007, 2007 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[23]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  Screener Evaluation of Pseudo-Colored Single Energy X-ray Luggage Images , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops.

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[25]  A. Schwaninger,et al.  The X-ray object recognition test (X-ray ORT) - a reliable and valid instrument for measuring visual abilities needed in X-ray screening , 2005, Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[26]  Maneesha Singh,et al.  Explosives detection systems (EDS) for aviation security , 2003, Signal Process..

[27]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical results from experiments on recognition categorisation , 2002 .

[28]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[29]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Investigating training, transfer and viewpoint effects resulting from recurrent CBT of X-Ray image interpretation , 2008 .

[30]  Colin G Drury,et al.  Change of search time and non-search time in X-ray baggage screening due to training , 2009, Ergonomics.

[31]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Does the application of virtually merged images influence the effectiveness of computer-based training in x-ray screening? , 2011, 2011 Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[32]  R. Leach The learning curve , 1992 .

[33]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Visual Cognition Abilities in X-Ray Screening , 2008 .

[34]  D. Goodin The cambridge dictionary of statistics , 1999 .

[35]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Increased detection performance in airport security screening using the x - ray ort as pre - employm , 2006 .

[36]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical results from experiments on recognition & categorisation. Information Society Technologies (IST) programme, Cognitive Vision Systems - CogVis (IST-2000-29375). , 2011 .

[37]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Do "Image Enhancement" Functions Really Enhance X-Ray Image Interpretation? , 2007 .

[39]  A Fainberg,et al.  Explosives Detection for Aviation Security , 1992, Science.

[40]  D. Aaronson,et al.  Extensions of Grier's computational formulas for A' and B'' to below-chance performance. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  S. Ogorodnikov,et al.  Processing of interlaced images in 4–10 MeV dual energy customs system for material recognition , 2002 .

[42]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Evaluating the two-component inspection model in a simplified luggage search task , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Shaun Helman,et al.  The impact of image based factors and training on threat detection performance in X-ray screening. , 2008 .

[44]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Assessing X-ray image interpretation competency of airport security screeners. , 2006 .