On the prospects of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for open science and academic publishing

Distributed ledger technologies such as blockchains and smart contracts have the potential to transform many sectors ranging from the handling of health records to real estate. Here we discuss the value proposition of these technologies and cryptocurrencies for science in general and academic publishing in specific. We outline concrete use cases, provide an informal model of how the Semantic Web journal’s peer-review workflow could benefit from distributed ledger technologies, and also point out challenges in implementing such a setup.

[1]  Andy Extance.  Could Bitcoin technology help science? , 2017, Nature.

[2]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market , 2017 .

[3]  Marc Pilkington,et al.  Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications , 2015 .

[4]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  PROV-O: The PROV Ontology , 2013 .

[5]  John Domingue,et al.  ScienceMiles: Digital Currency for Researchers , 2018, WWW.

[6]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  ProvChain: A Blockchain-Based Data Provenance Architecture in Cloud Environment with Enhanced Privacy and Availability , 2017, 2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID).

[7]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Combining Text Embedding and Knowledge Graph Embedding Techniques for Academic Search Engines , 2018, Semdeep/NLIWoD@ISWC.

[8]  Christina K. Pikas,et al.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.

[9]  David Charles De Roure,et al.  myExperiment: social networking for workflow-using e-scientists , 2007, WORKS '07.

[10]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics , 2013, SEMWEB.

[11]  Anna Cinzia Squicciarini,et al.  Toward De-Anonymizing Bitcoin by Mapping Users Location , 2015, CODASPY.

[12]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Open and transparent: the review process of the Semantic Web journal , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[13]  Joris van Rossum.  Blockchain for Research , 2017 .

[14]  Benedikt Fecher,et al.  Could Blockchain provide the technical fix to solve science’s reproducibility crisis? , 2016 .

[15]  Hans Byström,et al.  Blockchains, Real-time Accounting, and the Future of Credit Risk Modeling , 2019, Ledger.

[16]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system , 2006, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[17]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Incentives, punishment, and behavior , 2003 .

[18]  Marc Hauser,et al.  An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem , 2007, PLoS biology.

[19]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Blockchain Technology: Applications in Health Care , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Towards an Ontology-Driven Blockchain Design for Supply Chain Provenance , 2016, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[21]  Matthew B Hoy.  An Introduction to the Blockchain and Its Implications for Libraries and Medicine , 2017, Medical reference services quarterly.

[22]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows , 2007, Computer.

[23]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE. Incentives, Punishment, and Behavior , 2004 .

[24]  J. A. Smiley,et al.  Incentives , 2019, Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics.

[25]  Hovav Shacham,et al.  Short Signatures from the Weil Pairing , 2001, J. Cryptol..

[26]  Christina K. Pikas,et al.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.