Cetuximab/irinotecan-chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION Cetuximab and irinotecan are effective agents in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) after either irinotecanor oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. Here, the efficacy of this combination in patients with the KRAS wild-type gene as second- or further-line therapy is reviewed and data are collected in a pooled analysis. METHODS Studies that enrolled pretreated CRC patients for second-line therapy or beyond were identified using electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE). A systematic analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 2.2.064) to calculate the event rate of response and the 95% confidence interval. The weighted median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also calculated with NCSS 2007 software. We tested for significant heterogeneity using Cochran's chi-square test and the I(2) index. RESULTS Twenty-five studies published between 2007 and 2012 were eligible for this analysis, with a total of 1,712 KRAS wild-type patients enrolled. The overall response rate was 31.9% with similar response rates of 28. 7% for second-line treatment and 31.1% for third or further lines. The overall weighted median OS and PFS were 12.5 and 6 months with a weighted OS of 11.56 and 12.2 months for second- and further-line CRC settings, respectively. CONCLUSION In metastatic KRAS wild-type CRC patients pretreated with one or more lines of therapy, cetuximab plus irinotecan-based chemotherapy is an active treatment. Response rates and survival outcomes appear similar in second-line therapy or beyond.

[1]  S. Kato,et al.  Clinical usefulness of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations as predictive markers of cetuximab efficacy in irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-refractory Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2013, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  P. Tappenden,et al.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisa , 2013, Health technology assessment.

[3]  D. Sargent,et al.  Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[4]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  Clinical outcome of Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients harbouring the KRAS p.G13D mutation treated with cetuximab + irinotecan. , 2012, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[5]  M. Parmar,et al.  Does anti-EGFR therapy improve outcome in advanced colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[6]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Tae Won Kim,et al.  Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status , 2012, Investigational New Drugs.

[8]  R. Bianco,et al.  KRAS mutation detection by high-resolution melting analysis significantly predicts clinical benefit of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  E. Maccaroni,et al.  Analysis of HER-3, insulin growth factor-1, nuclear factor-kB and epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number in the prediction of clinical outcome for K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan-cetuximab. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Phase I Study of Cetuximab, Irinotecan, and Vandetanib (ZD6474) as Therapy for Patients with Previously Treated Metastastic Colorectal Cancer , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  J. Pagès,et al.  Effect of low-frequency KRAS mutations on the response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  T. Price,et al.  Cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer , 2012, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[13]  A. Mahmoud,et al.  Anti-EGFR (cetuximab) combined with irinotecan for treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) , 2012, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. Fakih,et al.  Phase II study of irinotecan and cetuximab given every 2 weeks as second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer. , 2012, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[15]  J. Sakamoto,et al.  Phase II multicenter study of second-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (FLIER) in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Final analysis of survival and additional analysis of BRAF, PI3CA mutations. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  K. Matsuo,et al.  Sensitivity to previous irinotecan treatment does not predict the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with cetuximab plus irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[17]  Shung-Haur Yang,et al.  The status of EGFR‐associated genes could predict the outcome and tumor response of chemo‐refractory metastatic colorectal patients using cetuximab and chemotherapy , 2011, Journal of surgical oncology.

[18]  M. Hou,et al.  Prospective analysis of KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 treatment regimens. , 2011, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[19]  S. Curley,et al.  Is resection of colorectal liver metastases after a second‐line chemotherapy regimen justified? , 2011, Cancer.

[20]  M. Yasukawa,et al.  [Analysis of the correlation with KRAS gene mutation status and the benefit of cetuximab plus irinotecan as third- line chemotherapy for the Treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer]. , 2011, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[21]  E. Vasile,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan after irinotecan failure in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status. , 2011, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[22]  K. Vistisen,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan after failure of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[23]  R. Lim,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients: the ELSIE study. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[24]  J. Lindebjerg,et al.  EGFR related mutational status and association to clinical outcome of third-line cetuximab-irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[25]  S. Barni,et al.  Cetuximab and panitumumab in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2011, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[26]  S. Kato,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan for FOLFOX and FOLFIRI-refractory patients with EGFR-positive advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety based on KRAS mutation status (T- CORE0801). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Peeters,et al.  Health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer-specific symptoms in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic disease treated with panitumumab , 2010, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[28]  Yu-hong Li,et al.  Impact of KRAS mutation and PTEN expression on cetuximab-treated colorectal cancer. , 2010, World Journal of Gastroenterology.

[29]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  S. Jang,et al.  A phase II trial of cetuximab/irinotecan every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that expresses wild-type KRAS after failure to first-line therapy with an irinotecan-containing regimen with or without detectable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. , 2010 .

[32]  I. Sperduti,et al.  FEB study: Efficacy treatment evaluation in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) changing monoclonal antibody (MA) after progression with chemotherapy. , 2010 .

[33]  I. Christensen,et al.  Cetuximab every second week with irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan: KRAS mutation status and efficacy. , 2010 .

[34]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  J. Reid,et al.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Multi-Determinants Analysis of Molecular Alterations for Predicting Clinical Benefit to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  J. Kim,et al.  The Role of KRAS Mutations in Predicting the Efficacy of Cetuximab-Plus-Irinotecan Therapy in Irinotecan-Refractory Korean Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients , 2009, Oncology.

[39]  N. Funel,et al.  PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[41]  N. Pavlakis,et al.  Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  Seta Shahin,et al.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  M. Gonen,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: the BOND-2 study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  P. Catalano,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[49]  F. Recchia,et al.  Multicentre phase II study of bifractionated CPT-11 with bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with FOLFOX , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  C. Tournigand,et al.  FOLFIRI Followed by FOLFOX6 or the Reverse Sequence in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized GERCOR Study , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.