The influence of substrate on the functional response of an avian granivore and its implications for farmland bird conservation

Few studies to date have considered the effect of substrate on the functional response of an organism feeding on prey of varying visibility. Intake rates of lone captive canaries, Serinus canarius L., were measured at varying seed densities on patches of either earth or short grass (<1 cm). Experiment 1, using pale seeds, found intake rates were significantly higher and search times significantly lower on earth than on grass. Two measures of crypticity (contrast in light reflectance as measured using a spectrophotometer and an experiment with humans) found pale seeds to be more visible on earth. The results from experiment 1 could be explained by this difference in crypsis. Experiment 2 used identical seeds to those in experiment 1 except they were dyed to match their backgrounds. The two measures of crypticity both found that black seeds were less visible on earth than green seeds were on grass. However, intake rates were still significantly higher on earth than grass. Seed colour preference, vegetation impeding movement, and differences in vigilance rates or seed accessibility could not explain this result. We discuss three other potentially explanatory mechanisms, the most likely of which was the greater surface area needed for scanning created by the structure of grass. Crucially, regardless of the mechanism(s) involved, many vegetated substrates share similar properties with grass (structural complexity and shiny surfaces which reflect light) and so the outcome of our findings are likely to extend to many natural situations. Conservationists wishing to encourage granivorous birds should consider enhancing food accessibility by providing uniform substrates, such as bare earth, for them to forage on. In addition, behaviour-based models should incorporate the effects of habitat into their equations of the functional response.

[1]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the consequences of habitat loss for migratory populations , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  J. Greenwood,et al.  A second silent spring? , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  G. Tucker,et al.  Birds in Europe : their conservation status , 1994 .

[4]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[5]  C. Perrins,et al.  Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978, Nature.

[6]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[7]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2000, Science.

[8]  J. Goss‐Custard,et al.  The effect of dominance and feeding method on the intake rates of oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels , 1988 .

[9]  Gareth Jones,et al.  The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland 1988-1991 , 1993 .

[10]  M. Slaby,et al.  Color Preference and Short-Term Learning by Steller's Jays , 1977 .

[11]  L. Best,et al.  Grit Use by Birds , 1999 .

[12]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  The winter distribution of seed‐eating birds: habitat structure, seed density and seasonal depletion , 1999 .

[13]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management , 1994 .

[14]  H. Ronald Pulliam,et al.  SEARCH AND PREY DETECTION BY FORAGING SPARROWS , 1993 .

[15]  C. Brownsmith.  Foraging Rates of Starlings in Two Habitats , 1977 .

[16]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Spatially explicit, individual-based, behavioural models of the annual cycle of two migratory goose populations , 2000 .

[17]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: Is visibility important? , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  K. Norris,et al.  Interference competition and the functional response of oystercatchers searching for cockles by touch , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The second Silent Spring? , 1999, Nature.

[20]  Stephen R. Baillie,et al.  Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain , 1995 .

[21]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search Patterns , 1974 .

[22]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Ultraviolet vision in birds: What is its function? , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes , 1974 .

[24]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[25]  P. Grant,et al.  RAINFALL ON THE GALAPAGOS AND THE DEMOGRAPHY OF DARWIN'S FINCHES , 1980 .

[26]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[27]  R. Green,et al.  Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Interference competition at low competitor densities in blackbirds Turdus merula , 1997 .

[29]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Habitat characteristics affecting use of lowland agricultural grassland by birds in winter , 2000 .

[30]  Stephen J. Browne,et al.  Territory distribution and breeding success of skylarks Alauda arvensis on organic and intensive farmland in southern England , 1997 .

[31]  S. Wotton,et al.  Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK , 2001 .

[32]  A. Granström,et al.  Post-dispersal predation on Pinus sylvestris seeds by Fringilla spp: ground substrate affects selection for seed color , 1997, Oecologia.

[33]  L. Best,et al.  Grit Color Selection by House Sparrows and Northern Bobwhites , 1996 .

[34]  J. T.R. Sharrock,et al.  The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland , 1980 .

[35]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  Winter field use by the European Starling Sturnus vulgaris: habitat preferences and the availability of prey , 1995 .