Can drivers modulate the effect of a motor priming assistance device during lane departure

Traditional Lane Departure Warning Systems are designed to improve the driver’s assessment of vehicle position. Motor priming (MP) devices, consisting of fast directional oscillations on the steering wheel, are also hypothesized to directly trigger the corrective motor response. The efficacy of MP has been proven (Navarro et al., 2007, 2010). It remains to determine whether drivers would be able to modulate or inhibit the effects of MP effects when necessary (e.g., weak risk, system failure). In two simulator studies, the effect of two levels of MP strength was studied in lane departure situations. First, we addressed the question of how the effect of MP could be modulated by expected risk. Second, we determined whether an erroneous directional cue could be inhibited and countered. Results showed that MP reduced lane excursion duration, to a greater degree with strong MP than light MP. The lower the expected risk, the higher was the duration of excursion, whatever the strength of the motor cue. Drivers inhibited their steering response and countered MP when its direction was erroneous. In some cases, due to shorter reaction times, the duration of lateral excursions was reduced even with the invalid cue. Thus, MP improved recovery manoeuvres, whilst drivers remained in full control of steering. This suggests a modulation of the effect of MP by higher levels of cognitive control.

[1]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Sharing Control Between Humans and Automation Using Haptic Interface: Primary and Secondary Task Performance Benefits , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  J. Hoc,et al.  Cognitive Control Dynamics for Reaching a Satisficing Performance in Complex Dynamic Situations , 2007 .

[4]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety , 2009 .

[6]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Human behavior and traffic safety , 2011 .

[7]  Karsten Lemmer,et al.  Reflektas: lane departure prevention system based on behavioural control , 2008 .

[8]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Pre-Crash Scenario Typology for Crash Avoidance Research , 2007 .

[9]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Bruno Lecoutre,et al.  Specific inference in ANOVA: From significance tests to Bayesian procedures , 1983 .

[11]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[12]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Lateral Control Assistance for Car Drivers: A Comparison of Motor Priming and Warning Systems , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Håkan Jansson,et al.  An analysis of driver’s steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system , 2003 .

[14]  Henry Rouanet,et al.  Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. , 1996 .