Image processing for synthesis imaging of mingantu spectral radioheliograph (MUSER)

MingantU SpEctral Radioheliograph (MUSER) can generate the images of the Sun with high time, frequency and spatial resolutions. It employs the aperture synthesis (AS) principle to image the Sun with plentiful solar radio activities. Different from general imaging system, AS records sparse Fourier components of the spatial image of the Sun by recurring to electromagnetic interference imaging principle. However, due to the limited number of antennas, the recorded Fourier components is extremely sparse, which results in very blurring images. This problem is equivalent to convoluting an image with a Gaussian smoothing filter in spatial domain. Accordingly, one can recover an image from its burred version by inverse operation of convolution, namely deconvolution, which was widely known as CLEAN algorithm. This algorithm however does not perform well on solar images characterized by extended source instead point source. In this paper, a new method based on compressed sensing (CS) is proposed to replace CLEAN for imaging or preceded by CLEAN. It describes itself a standard optimization function constrained by sparseness. Specifically, it adopts structural group dictionary to represent solar images for exploring both local sparsity and nonlocal self-similarity. We also investigate image reconstruction of MUSER in a wider range by employing several state-of-the-art image deburring methods. The performance analysis reveals that the proposed method contributes image quality improvement of MUSER markedly beyond the other methods.

[1]  F. Hoog,et al.  The application of compressive sampling to radio astronomy - II. Faraday rotation measure synthesis , 2011, 1106.1709.

[2]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  A simulation of imaging capabilities for the Chinese Spectral Radioheliograph , 2012, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[3]  Wen Gao,et al.  Group-Based Sparse Representation for Image Restoration , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Image Restoration Using Joint Statistical Modeling in a Space-Transform Domain , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  U. Schwarz,et al.  The Multi-Resolution CLEAN and its application to the short-spacing problem in interferometry , 1988 .

[6]  Michael Elad,et al.  Double Sparsity: Learning Sparse Dictionaries for Sparse Signal Approximation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Min Su,et al.  A hybrid learning system for image deblurring , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  Fast Gradient-Based Algorithms for Constrained Total Variation Image Denoising and Deblurring Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  P. Vandergheynst,et al.  Compressed sensing imaging techniques for radio interferometry , 2008, 0812.4933.

[10]  Marcus Magnor,et al.  SparseRI: A Compressed Sensing Framework for Aperture Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy , 2010 .

[11]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  T. Cornwell,et al.  A simple maximum entropy deconvolution algorithm , 1985 .

[13]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[14]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Deconvolution in Astronomy: A Review , 2002 .

[17]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Shiqian Ma,et al.  An efficient algorithm for compressed MR imaging using total variation and wavelets , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  Tim J. Cornwell,et al.  Multiscale CLEAN Deconvolution of Radio Synthesis Images , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[20]  Michael Elad,et al.  Analysis K-SVD: A Dictionary-Learning Algorithm for the Analysis Sparse Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  J. Högbom,et al.  APERTURE SYNTHESIS WITH A NON-REGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF INTERFEROMETER BASELINES. Commentary , 1974 .

[22]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  The Chinese Spectral Radioheliograph—CSRH , 2009 .

[23]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[24]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[25]  Feng Li,et al.  The application of compressive sampling to radio astronomy I: Deconvolution , 2011, 1106.1711.

[26]  Raymond H. Chan,et al.  A Primal–Dual Method for Total-Variation-Based Wavelet Domain Inpainting , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Compressed Sensing in Astronomy , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[28]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[29]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[30]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Gaofeng Meng,et al.  Image Deblurring with Coupled Dictionary Learning , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.