The beta-D-glucose scaffold as a beta-turn mimetic.

Activity and selectivity are typically the first considerations when designing a drug. However, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) are equally important considerations. Peptides can provide a combination of potent binding and exquisite selectivity, as evidenced by their pervasive use as enzymes, hormones, and signaling agents within living systems. In particular, peptidic turn motifs are key elements of molecular recognition. They may be found at the exposed surfaces of globular proteins, where they are available for binding interactions with other peptides and small molecules. However, despite these advantages, peptides often make poor drugs. The amide backbone is subject to rapid enzymatic proteolysis, resulting in short half-lives. Furthermore, the ability of the amide backbone to hydrogen bond with water restricts its ability to cross membranes and, consequentially, results in poor oral bioavailability. Accordingly, the development of nonpeptidic scaffolds that mimic peptidic turn motifs represents a promising means of converting peptidic agents into more drugable molecules. In this Account, we describe the design and synthesis of beta-turn mimetics that use a beta-D-glucose scaffold, the first use of a sugar scaffold for this purpose. Somatostatin (SRIF) is a small protein (14 amino acid residues) human hormone; a shorter (6 amino acid residues) synthetic peptide, L-363,301, is a fully peptidal agonist. These two cyclic peptides share the beta-turn motif comprising Phe(7)-Trp(8)-Lys(9)-Thr(10) (d-Trp(8) in the case of L-363,301), of which the tryptophan and lysine residues in the i + 1 and i + 2 positions, respectively, are critical for binding. In 1988, we initiated a program that tested and validated the then-novel proposition that the beta-D-glucose scaffold can mimic the beta-turn in L-363,301. The beta-D-glucose scaffold proved to be an attractive mimic of a beta-turn in part because it permits the convenient attachment of amino acid side chains via facile etherification reactions, rather than carbon-carbon bond formations; it is also an inexpensive starting material with well-defined stereochemistry. From the beginning, biological assays were used alongside physical measurements to assess the relevance of the design. Our first two synthetic targets, compounds 6 and 7, bound the SRIF receptors on benchmark (AtT-20) cells, albeit weakly, consistent with the objective of the design. Subsequently, a better ligand (8) and two congeners were found to be agonists at the SRIF receptors, providing convincing evidence that the peptide backbone is not required for receptor binding or signal transduction. The unexpectedly high level of receptor affinity of selected analogs, as well as the fortuitous discovery that our peptidomimetics were active against several chemically distinct receptors, led us to hypothesize that these monosaccharides could access multiple potential binding modes. Our later studies of this sugar scaffold confirmed this property, which we termed pseudosymmetry, whereby multiple similar but nonidentical motifs are displayed within a single analog. We propose the presence of pseudosymmetry to be an element of privilege and an advantage for lead discovery.

[1]  M. M. Shemyakin,et al.  Topochemical investigations of peptide systems. , 1969, Angewandte Chemie.

[2]  J. Diamond,et al.  Molecular forces governing non-electrolyte permeation through cell membranes , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Rudinger The Design of Peptide Hormone Analogs , 1971 .

[4]  D. Urry,et al.  Proposed conformation of oxytocin in solution. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Conformation of the LL and LD hairpin bends with internal hydrogen bonds in proteins and peptides. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  R. Guillemin,et al.  Isolation of somatostatin (a somatotropin release inhibiting factor) of ovine hypothalamic origin. , 1974, Canadian journal of biochemistry.

[7]  H. Morris,et al.  Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity , 1975, Nature.

[8]  W. Vale,et al.  D-Trp8-somatostatin: an analog of somatostatin more potent than the native molecule. , 1975, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  N. Ling,et al.  Biologic and immunologic activities and applications of somatostatin analogs. , 1978, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[10]  E. Cragoe,et al.  (Acylaryloxy)acetic acid diuretics. 2. (2-Alkyl-2-aryl-1-oxo-5-indanyloxy)acetic acids. , 1978, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  S J Bergstrand,et al.  Conformationally restricted bicyclic analogs of somatostatin. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  E. Cragoe,et al.  (ACYLARYLOXY)ACETIC ACID DIURETICS. 1. (2-ALKYL- AND 2,2-DIALKYL-1-OXO-5-INDANYLOXY)ACETIC ACIDS , 1978 .

[13]  D. Veber,et al.  Highly active cyclic and bicyclic somatostatin analogues of reduced ring size , 1979, Nature.

[14]  P. Farmer Bridging the Gap between Bioactive Peptides and Nonpeptides: Some Perspectives in Design , 1980 .

[15]  Ruth F. Nutt,et al.  A potent cyclic hexapeptide analogue of somatostatin , 1981, Nature.

[16]  D. Veber,et al.  On the low energy solution conformation of somatostatin. , 1981, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  G. Ponticello,et al.  APPROACHES TO VASODILATING/β-ADRENERGIC BLOCKING AGENTS: EXAMPLES OF THE DIHYDROLUTIDINE TYPE , 1981 .

[18]  P. Marbach,et al.  SMS 201-995: a very potent and selective octapeptide analogue of somatostatin with prolonged action. , 1982, Life sciences.

[19]  Roger M. Freidinger,et al.  Protected lactam-bridged dipeptides for use as conformational constraints in peptides , 1982 .

[20]  D. Veber,et al.  A super active cyclic hexapeptide analog of somatostatin. , 1984, Life sciences.

[21]  V. Hruby,et al.  Conformationally restricted analogs of somatostatin with high mu-opiate receptor specificity. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Veber,et al.  The design of metabolically-stable peptide analogs , 1985, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  J. Reubi,et al.  Somatostatin Receptors , 1997, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[24]  P. Belanger,et al.  Preparation of exo-6-benzyl-exo-2-(m-hydroxyphenyl)-1-dimethylaminomethylbicyclo[2.2.2.]octane. A non-peptide mimic of enkephalins , 1986 .

[25]  B. E. Evans,et al.  Methods for drug discovery: development of potent, selective, orally effective cholecystokinin antagonists. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  Jun Octreotide , 1989, The Lancet.

[27]  R. Hirschmann Medicinal Chemistry in the Golden Age of Biology: Lessons from Steroid and Peptide Research , 1991 .

[28]  S. Seino,et al.  Cloning and functional characterization of a family of human and mouse somatostatin receptors expressed in brain, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Ralph Hirschmann,et al.  Design, synthesis, and crystal structure of a pyrrolinone-based peptidomimetic possessing the conformation of a .beta.-strand: potential application to the design of novel inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes , 1992 .

[30]  Ralph Hirschmann,et al.  Nonpeptidal peptidomimetics with a β-D-glucose scaffolding. A partial somatostatin agonist bearing a close structural relationship to a potent, selective substance P antagonist , 1992 .

[31]  P. Carroll,et al.  Design, Synthesis, and Crystal Structure of a Pyrrolinone-Based Peptidomimetic Possessing the Conformation of a β-Strand: Potential Application to the Design of Novel Inhibitors of Proteolytic Enzymes , 1993 .

[32]  Joseph M. Salvino,et al.  De novo design and synthesis of somatostatin non-peptide peptidomimetics utilizing beta-D-glucose as a novel scaffolding , 1993 .

[33]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  C. Donaldson,et al.  De Novo Design and Synthesis of Somatostatin Non‐Peptide Peptidomimetics Utilizing β‐D‐Glucose as a Novel Scaffolding. , 1994 .

[35]  Molecular biology of somatostatin receptors. , 1995, Endocrine reviews.

[36]  A. D'avignon,et al.  CONFORMATIONALLY RESTRICTED PEPTIDE MIMETICS : THE INCORPORATION OF 6,5-BICYCLIC LACTAM RING SKELETONS INTO PEPTIDES , 1995 .

[37]  V. Madison,et al.  Peptide mimetics of thyrotropin-releasing hormone based on a cyclohexane framework: design, synthesis, and cognition-enhancing properties. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  A B Smith,et al.  Synthesis of potent cyclic hexapeptide NK-1 antagonists. Use of a minilibrary in transforming a peptidal somatostatin receptor ligand into an NK-1 receptor ligand via a polyvalent peptidomimetic. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  A. D'avignon,et al.  Conformationally Restricted Peptide Mimetics: The Incorporation of 6,5‐ Bicyclic Lactam Ring Skeletons into Peptides. , 1996 .

[41]  C. Strader,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL FUNCTIONAL GROUPS WITHIN BINDING POCKETS OF G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS , 1996 .

[42]  Y. Patel Molecular pharmacology of somatostatin receptor subtypes , 1997, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[43]  M. Navre,et al.  Rational design and combinatorial evaluation of enzyme inhibitor scaffolds: identification of novel inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  A B Smith,et al.  Modulation of receptor and receptor subtype affinities using diastereomeric and enantiomeric monosaccharide scaffolds as a means to structural and biological diversity. A new route to ether synthesis. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  C. Humblet,et al.  G‐Protein Coupled Receptors: Models, Mutagenesis, and Drug Design , 1998 .

[46]  Michael M. Hann,et al.  RECAP — Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry. , 1998 .

[47]  J. Mason,et al.  New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[48]  Helen J. Mitchell,et al.  Natural Product-like Combinatorial Libraries Based on Privileged Structures. 1. General Principles and Solid-Phase Synthesis of Benzopyrans , 2000 .

[49]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2000, Science.

[50]  D. Underwood,et al.  Synthesis of a substance P antagonist with a somatostatin scaffold: factors affecting agonism/antagonism at GPCRs and the role of pseudosymmetry. , 2000, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[51]  Z. Csaba,et al.  Cellular biology of somatostatin receptors , 2001, Neuropeptides.

[52]  D. A. Bosco,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics During Catalysis , 2002, Science.

[53]  D. Underwood,et al.  Effects of heterocyclic aromatic substituents on binding affinities at two distinct sites of somatostatin receptors. Correlation with the electrostatic potential of the substituents. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  R. Dolle,et al.  Comprehensive Survey of Combinatorial Library Synthesis: 1998 , 2010 .