Flake scar density and handaxe reduction intensity

Abstract Quantifying biface reduction is an important goal in Palaeolithic archaeology for determining the length of reduction sequences, and to contextualise interpretations of biface morphology. In particular there is contention as to whether or not Acheulean handaxes were resharpened. Here we test the flake scar density index (SDI), calculated using 3D laser scans of bifaces, as a measure of handaxe reduction. We experimentally reduced an assemblage of 57 handaxes tracking changes in their SDI and mass lost at each stage of reduction. We tested the effects of blank type, coarseness of the stone, and different protocols for reduction. Our results show that the SDI is indeed an effective measure of mass lost, although it is influenced by the blank type of the handaxe. We applied the SDI to two archaeological assemblages of Acheulean bifaces from East Africa: Kariandusi and Isenya; and two archaeological assemblages from India: Patpara and Bhimbetka. Exotic materials were more reduced at Kariandusi and Isenya. A relationship between SDI and volume, such that smaller handaxes have higher scar densities, and are thus likely small because they have been reduced more, suggests resharpening. Conversely, the lack of such a relationship may be taken as evidence that bifaces were not resharpened. Our results show that exotic handaxes from Kariandusi, local handaxes from Isenya, and bifaces in general from Patpara were resharpened. On the other hand neither local handaxes from Kariandusi, cleavers from Isenya, nor cleavers from Bhimbetka, were resharpened. The unretouched bit formed by the termination of the original flake blank on the Isenya and Bhimbetka cleavers provides independent evidence for the lack of resharpening.

[1]  S. McPherron,et al.  What typology can tell us about Acheulian handaxe production , 2006 .

[2]  Derek A. Roe,et al.  British Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Handaxe Groups , 1969, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

[3]  R. Crompton,et al.  Kariandusi: Acheulean morphology and the question of allometry , 1994 .

[4]  P. Texier,et al.  Isenya: état des recherches sur un nouveau site acheuléen d'Afrique orientale , 1988 .

[5]  Shannon P. McPherron,et al.  Handaxes as a Measure of the Mental Capabilities of Early Hominids , 2000 .

[6]  C. Clarkson,et al.  Lithics down under: Australian perspectives on lithic reduction, use and classification , 2005 .

[7]  V. N. Misra.  The Acheulian Industry of Rock Shelter IIIF-23 at Bhimbetka, Central India - a Preliminary Study , 1978 .

[8]  A. Nowell.  Coincidental factors of handaxe morphology , 2002 .

[9]  Mark J. White,et al.  On the Significance of Acheulean Biface Variability in Southern Britain , 1998, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

[10]  Shannon P McPherron,et al.  The handaxe reloaded: a morphometric reassessment of Acheulian and Middle Paleolithic handaxes. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[11]  John McNabb,et al.  The Large Cutting Tools from the South African Acheulean and the Question of Social Traditions1 , 2004, Current Anthropology.

[12]  M. Petraglia,et al.  Acheulean bifaces and early human behavioral patterns in East Africa and South India , 2003 .

[13]  A. Nowell,et al.  The Case Against Sexual Selection as an Explanation of Handaxe Morphology , 2009 .

[14]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Landscape-scale variation in hominin tool use: Evidence from the Developed Oldowan. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[15]  Steven L. Kuhn,et al.  "Unpacking" Reduction: Lithic Raw Material Economy in the Mousterian of West-Central Italy , 1991 .

[16]  Chris Clarkson,et al.  Holocene scraper reduction, technological organization and landuse at Ingaladdi Rockshelter, Northern Australia , 2002 .

[17]  Sacha C. Jones,et al.  Generativity, hierarchical action and recursion in the technology of the Acheulean to Middle Palaeolithic transition: a perspective from Patpara, the Son Valley, India. , 2013, Journal of human evolution.

[18]  M. Pope.  The significance of biface-rich assemblages: An examination of the behavioural controls on lithic assemblage formation in the Lower Palaeolithic , 2003 .

[19]  Mb Roberts,et al.  Flaking technology at the acheulean site of Boxgrove (West Sussex, England) , 1988 .

[20]  K. Emery,et al.  A re-examination of variability in handaxe form in the British Palaeolithic , 2010 .

[21]  Chris Clarkson,et al.  Measuring core reduction using 3D flake scar density: A test case of changing core reduction at Klasies River Mouth, South Africa , 2013 .

[22]  Bob Patten,et al.  Pattern and Allometric Measurement of Reduction in Experimental Folsom Bifaces , 2007 .

[23]  Shannon P. McPherron,et al.  Ovate and pointed handaxe assemblages: Two points make a line , 1999 .

[24]  C. Shipton.  Taphonomy and Behaviour at the Acheulean Site of Kariandusi, Kenya , 2011 .