Sharing patient-generated data with healthcare providers: findings from a 2019 national survey

OBJECTIVE Our study estimates the prevalence and predictors of wearable device adoption and data sharing with healthcare providers in a nationally representative sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were obtained from the 2019 Health Information National Trend Survey. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to examine predictors of device adoption and data sharing. RESULTS The sample contained 4159 individuals, 29.9% of whom had adopted a wearable device in 2019. Among adopters, 46.3% had shared data with their provider. Individuals with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.39; 95% CI, 1.66-3.45; P < .0001), hypertension (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.12-3.70; P < .0001), and multiple chronic conditions (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.32; P < .0001) had significantly higher odds of wearable device adoption. Individuals with a usual source of care (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.95-3.04; P < .0001), diabetes (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.32-2.08; P < .0001), and hypertension (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.44-2.20; P < .0001) had significantly higher odds of sharing data with providers. DISCUSSION A third of individuals adopted a wearable medical device and nearly 50% of individuals who owned a device shared data with a provider in 2019. Patients with certain conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, were more likely to adopt devices and share data with providers. Social determinants of health, such as income and usual source of care, negatively affected wearable device adoption and data sharing, similarly to other consumer health technologies. CONCLUSIONS Wearable device adoption and data sharing with providers may be more common than prior studies have reported; however, digital disparities were noted. Studies are needed that test implementation strategies to expand wearable device use and data sharing into care delivery.

[1]  David Rodbard,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  Howard C Zisser,et al.  Reduction in hemoglobin A1C with real-time continuous glucose monitoring: results from a 12-week observational study. , 2007, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[3]  Young-Rock Hong,et al.  Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use , 2019, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Maria Lindén,et al.  A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems – Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption , 2017, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Alexander G Logan,et al.  Attitudes of primary care physicians and their patients about home blood pressure monitoring in Ontario , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[6]  Arlene E. Chung,et al.  Potential and challenges of patient-generated health data for high-quality cancer care. , 2015, Journal of oncology practice.

[7]  H. J. Yoo,et al.  Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. , 2008, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[8]  Frank H. Galvan,et al.  Medical mistrust as a key mediator in the association between perceived discrimination and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive Latino men , 2017, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[9]  S. Carlson,et al.  Physical Activity Surveillance Using Wearable Activity Monitors: Are US Adults Willing to Share Their Data? , 2020, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[10]  Ching-Hua Chen,et al.  Data quality challenges for person-generated health and wellness data , 2018, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[11]  Garth Fuller,et al.  A Large-Scale Initiative Inviting Patients to Share Personal Fitness Tracker Data with Their Providers: Initial Results , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Deborah A. Greenwood,et al.  A Systematic Review of Reviews Evaluating Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[13]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[14]  S. Kerry,et al.  Stroke patients' perceptions of home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study. , 2011, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  Yiwen Gao,et al.  International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2016 .

[16]  Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg Telemedicine Coding and Reimbursement - Current and Future Trends , 2020, Sleep Medicine Clinics.

[17]  Max Gill,et al.  Health Care Costs, Hospital Admissions, and Glycemic Control Using a Standalone, Real-Time, Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Commercially Insured Patients With Type 1 Diabetes , 2018, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[18]  T. Wykes,et al.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  R. Katz,et al.  Sociodemographic Differences in Fears and Mistrust Contributing to Unwillingness to Participate in Cancer Screenings , 2012, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[20]  Sara Chokshi,et al.  Wearable Health Technology and Electronic Health Record Integration: Scoping Review and Future Directions , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[21]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Experiences of patients and professionals participating in the HITS home blood pressure telemonitoring trial: a qualitative study , 2013, BMJ Open.

[22]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Sharing Patient-Generated Data in Clinical Practices: An Interview Study , 2016, AMIA.

[23]  Mohamed Abouzahra,et al.  Wearable device adoption among older adults: A mixed-methods study , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[24]  Stephanie J. Fonda,et al.  Short- and Long-Term Effects of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[25]  J. Ancker,et al.  “You Get Reminded You’re a Sick Person”: Personal Data Tracking and Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  A. Jenkins,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Review of an Innovation in Diabetes Management. , 2019, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[27]  D. Asch,et al.  Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. , 2015, JAMA.

[28]  Jacqueline Merrill,et al.  Converging and diverging needs between patients and providers who are collecting and using patient-generated health data: an integrative review , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  R. Shaw,et al.  Mobile health technology for personalized primary care medicine. , 2015, The American journal of medicine.

[30]  Lauren W. Cohen,et al.  Use of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring by Hypertensive Patients in Primary Care: Survey of a Practice‐Based Research Network Cohort , 2008, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[31]  Heather J Ross,et al.  Attitudes of Heart Failure Patients and Health care Providers towards Mobile Phone-Based Remote Monitoring , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  Luca Foschini,et al.  Using Wearable Devices and Smartphones to Track Physical Activity: Initial Activation, Sustained Use, and Step Counts Across Sociodemographic Characteristics in a National Sample , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  Ann Borda,et al.  Patient-generated health data management and quality challenges in remote patient monitoring , 2019, JAMIA open.

[34]  F. Penedo,et al.  Fatalism, medical mistrust, and pretreatment health‐related quality of life in ethnically diverse prostate cancer patients , 2017, Psycho-oncology.