A decision-making LCA for energy refurbishment of buildings: Conditions of comfort

Abstract This paper is focused on providing information to help in decision-making between five different scenarios for energy refurbishment, evaluating the lifecycle of each and also taking into consideration the level of comfort in dwellings. This work centres on one block built in 1983 in which temperatures have been monitored which show that the optimum temperature conditions are not reached for long periods during the year. The current state of the building is referred to as scenario one. Energy consumption is evaluated considering the lifecycle of the components necessary for the refurbishment, their subsequent operation and disposal. All scenarios address the suitability of passive measures or the implementation of active systems in temperate climates under the assumption that comfort in dwellings is achieved. Scenarios two and three are assessed applying insulation and changing the windows. The fourth and fifth implement an alternative solution, a controlled mechanical ventilation based on a typical mild climate cross ventilation. Evaluation uses two environmental indicators, gross energy requirement (GER) and global warming potential (GWP). It is concluded that scenarios four and five reduce the GER in 4.4 and 9%, respectively, and the GWP in 2.6 and 4.3% compared to the current state.

[1]  K. Adalberth,et al.  Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: a method , 1997 .

[2]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[3]  M. Beccali,et al.  LCA of a solar heating and cooling system equipped with a small water–ammonia absorption chiller , 2012 .

[4]  Tayfun Uygunoğlu,et al.  LCC analysis for energy-saving in residential buildings with different types of construction masonry , 2011 .

[5]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[6]  Ivo Mersiowsky,et al.  LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification , 2009 .

[8]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[9]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Environmental assessment of brownfield rehabilitation using two different life cycle inventory models , 2007 .

[10]  Pere Fullana,et al.  An update on the liaison of the two LCA-planets: 11th SETAC Europe Annual Meeting, 6–10 May 2001 in Madrid, Spain , 2001 .

[11]  Katarina Heikkilä,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using a weighting method for alternative air-conditioning systems , 2004 .

[12]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[13]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .

[14]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Manufacturing actor’s LCA , 2011 .

[15]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[16]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Environmental assessment of brownfield rehabilitation using two different life cycle inventory models , 2005 .

[17]  P.C.F. Bekker,et al.  A life-cycle approach in building , 1982 .

[18]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[19]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods , 2012 .

[20]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[21]  M. Raugei,et al.  From Life Cycle Assessment to Life Cycle Management , 2011 .

[22]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  Options to reduce the environmental impacts of residential buildings in the European Union—Potential and costs , 2010 .

[23]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.