ATR performance of a Rician model for SAR images

Radar targets often have both specular and diffuse scatterers. A conditionally Rician model for the amplitudes of pixels in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images quantitatively accounts for both types of scatterers. Conditionally Rician models generalize conditionally Gaussian models by including means with uniformly distributed phases in the complex imagery. Qualitatively, the values of the two parameters in the Rician model bring out different aspects of the images. For automatic target recognition (ATR), log-likelihoods are computed using parameters estimated from training data. Using MSTAR data, the resulting performance for a number of four class ATR problems representing both standard and extended operating conditions is studied and compared to the performance of corresponding conditionally Gaussian models. Performance is measured quantitatively using the Hilbert-Schmidt squared error for orientation estimation and the probability of error for recognition. For the MSTAR dataset used, the results indicate that algorithms based on conditionally Rician and conditionally Gaussian models yield similar results when a rich set of training data is available, but the performance under the Rician model suffers with smaller training sets. Due to the smaller number of distribution parameters, the conditionally Gaussian approach is able to yield a better performance for any fixed complexity.

[1]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  SAR ATR performance using a conditionally Gaussian model , 2001 .

[2]  Timothy D. Ross,et al.  Evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[3]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[4]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Information-Theoretic Image Formation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Timothy D. Ross,et al.  SAR ATR: so what's the problem? An MSTAR perspective , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Automatic target recognition organized via jump-diffusion algorithms , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Hilbert-Schmidt Lower Bounds for Estimators on Matrix Lie Groups for ATR , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  EM algorithm for estimating the parameters of a multivariate complex Rician density for polarimetric SAR , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Radar-Sonar Signal Processing and Gaussian Signals in Noise , 1992 .

[11]  Michael Lee Bryant,et al.  Standard SAR ATR evaluation experiments using the MSTAR public release data set , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  A Performance Complexity Study of Several Approaches to Automatic Target Recognition from Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1999 .

[13]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ATR FROM SAR IMAGERYJoseph , 1999 .