6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not of the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine

Intra-accumbens d-amphetamine enhances responding for reward-related stimuli (conditioned reinforcers, CRs), whereas intra-caudate d-amphetamine has only weak and variable effects (Taylor and Robbins 1984). The present experiment further examined the involvement of the nucleus accumbens and the role of dopamine (DA) in this effect. Thirsty rats were trained to associate a flash of a light and movement of a dipper (CR) with water. After implantation of permanent guide cannulae aimed at the nucleus accumbens, they were assigned to one of four groups, receiving either bilateral 6-OHDA (4 mg/ml free base in 2 μ1 0.1% ascorbic acid/0.9% saline) or sham (vehicle) infusions into the nucleus accumbens or the caudate nucleus. In the test phase, two novel levers were available. Responding on one lever (CR lever) produced the light and dipper stimuli without water presentation, whereas responding on the other (NCR lever) had no effect. All four groups received four counterbalanced intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine (3, 10, 20 μg/2 μl) or vehicle. On the 5th test day, subjects were pretreated subcutaneously with apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg). Intra-accumbens d-amphetamine in both sham-lesioned groups produced a dose-dependent increase in responding on the CR lever, but no significant change on the NCR lever. No selective increases in responding on either lever were found in animals with 6-OHDA-induced depletion of DA (>80%) in the nucleus accumbens following intra-accumbens d-amphetamine; however, in subjects with DA depletion of the posterior caudate nucleus (>80%), increases in responding on the CR lever were observed to be similar in magnitude to those of both the sham-lesioned groups. Following systemic administration of apomorphine, only rats in the nucleus-accumbens-lesioned group continued to respond, preferring the CR lever, thus suggesting the involvement of DA receptors in these effects. These results indicate that enhanced responding for CR following administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs is critically dependent on dopaminergic activation of the nucleus accumbens, rather than the caudate nucleus.

[1]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[2]  T. Hökfelt,et al.  Evidence for dopamine receptor stimulation by apomorphine , 1967, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[3]  L. Pellegrino,et al.  stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain , 1967 .

[4]  U. Ungerstedt,et al.  Postsynaptic supersensitivity after 6-hydroxy-dopamine induced degeneration of the nigro-striatal dopamine system. , 1971, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  N. Mackintosh The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[6]  M. Palkovits,et al.  Norepinephrine and dopamine in the limbic system of the rat. , 1974, Brain research.

[7]  S. Iversen,et al.  Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum , 1975, Brain Research.

[8]  H. Fibiger,et al.  On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and olfactory tubercle on feeding, locomotor activity, and amphetamine anorexia in the rat. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  K. E. Moore,et al.  Destruction of dopaminergic nerve terminals in nucleus accumbens: Effect on d-amphetamine self-administration , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[11]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  Per Brodal,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain L. J. Pellegrino, A. S. Pellegrino & A. J. Cushman. Plenum Press, New York (1979). 122 Figures. £22.50 , 1980, Neuroscience.

[13]  Gerard P. Smith,et al.  Relationships between selective denervation of dopamine terminal fields in the anterior forebrain and behavioral responses to amphetamine and apomorphine , 1980, Brain Research.

[14]  I. Mefford Application of high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to neurochemical analysis: measurement of catecholamines, serotonin and metabolites in rat brain , 1981, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  P. Bailey The neurobiology of the nucleus accumbens R. B. Chronister and J. F. de France (Eds). Haer Institute for Electrophysiological Research (1981). 388 pp , 1982, Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Phillips,et al.  Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning , 1982, Brain Research.

[17]  T. Robbins,et al.  Functional studies of the central catecholamines. , 1982, International review of neurobiology.

[18]  P. Jobe,et al.  Effect of increments in norepinephrine concentrations on seizure intensity in the genetically epilepsy-prone rat. , 1982, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[19]  O. Hornykiewicz,et al.  The topographical distribution of the monoaminergic innervation in the basal ganglia of the human brain. , 1983, Progress in brain research.

[20]  N. White,et al.  Conditioned place preference from intra-accumbens but not intra-caudate amphetamine injections. , 1983, Life sciences.

[21]  T. Robbins,et al.  Effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine upon operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens. , 1983, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[22]  P. Kelly,et al.  Effects of amphetamine and apomorphine on locomotor activity after 6-OHDA and electrolytic lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[23]  W. Nauta,et al.  Afferent and efferent relationships of the basal ganglia. , 1984, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[24]  T. Robbins,et al.  Comparative effects of infusions of 6-hydroxydopamine into nucleus accumbens and anterolateral hypothalamus induced by 6-hydroxydopamine on the response to dopamine agonists, body weight, locomotor activity and measures of exploration in the rat , 1985, Neuropharmacology.

[25]  J. B. Justice,et al.  Dopamine depletion in a striatal subregion disrupts performance of a skilled motor task in the rat , 1985, Brain Research.

[26]  A. Cools Mesolimbic dopamine and its control of locomotor activity in rats: differences in pharmacology and light/dark periodicity between the olfactory tubercle and the nucleus accumbens , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[27]  F. Bloom,et al.  Destruction of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens selectively attenuates cocaine but not heroin self-administration in rats , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  T. Robbins,et al.  Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[29]  R. Beninger,et al.  The effects of pipradrol on the acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: A role for sensory preconditioning , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  N. Swerdlow,et al.  Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[31]  N. Montanaro,et al.  Time course of rat motility response to apomorphine: A simple model for studying preferential blockade of brain dopamine receptors mediating sedation , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  T. Robbins,et al.  Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[33]  T. Robbins The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: Effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine , 1978, Psychopharmacology.

[34]  A. Monaco,et al.  Self-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain , 2004, Psychopharmacology.