Patients’ and carers’ experiences of interacting with home haemodialysis technology: implications for quality and safety

BackgroundLittle is known about patients’ and carers’ experiences of interacting with home haemodialysis (HHD) technology, in terms of user experience, how the design of the technology supports safety and fits with home use, and how the broader context of service provision impacts on patients’ use of the technology.MethodsData were gathered through ethnographic observations and interviews with 19 patients and their carers associated with four different hospitals in the UK, using five different HHD machines. All patients were managing their condition successfully on HHD. Data were analysed qualitatively, focusing on themes of how individuals used the machines and how they managed their own safety.ResultsFindings are organised by three themes: learning to use the technology, usability of the technology, and managing safety during dialysis. Home patients want to live their lives fully, and value the freedom and autonomy that HHD gives them; they adapt use of the technology to their lives and their home context. They also consider the machines to be safe; nevertheless, most participants reported feeling scared and having to learn through mistakes in the early months of dialysing at home. Home care nurses and technicians provide invaluable support. Although participants reported on strategies for anticipating problems and keeping safe, perceived limitations of the technology and of the broader system of care led some to trade off safety against immediate quality of life.ConclusionsEnhancing the quality and safety of the patient experience in HHD involves designing technology and the broader system of care to take account of how individuals manage their dialysis in the home. Possible design improvements to enhance the quality and safety of the patient experience include features to help patients manage their dialysis (e.g. providing timely reminders of next steps) and features to support communication between families and professionals (e.g. through remote monitoring).

[1]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Semi-structured qualitative studies , 2013 .

[2]  Julie Morris,et al.  Home hemodialysis: Beliefs, attitudes, and practice patterns , 2014, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[3]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[4]  A. Webster,et al.  Characteristics of dialysis important to patients and family caregivers: a mixed methods approach. , 2011, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[5]  C. Ribic,et al.  The impact of patient preference on dialysis modality and hemodialysis vascular access , 2014, BMC Nephrology.

[6]  Joseph A Cafazzo,et al.  Patient perceptions of remote monitoring for nocturnal home hemodialysis , 2010, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[7]  L. Yardley.  Dilemmas in qualitative health research , 2000 .

[8]  Karen Harker,et al.  Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Allison Tong,et al.  The beliefs and expectations of patients and caregivers about home haemodialysis: an interview study , 2013, BMJ Open.

[10]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) , 1997 .

[11]  G. Piccoli,et al.  Home dialysis, garbage, and privacy: Nothing is trivial in home hemodialysis. , 2005, Kidney international.

[12]  An Analysis of Home and Hospital Medical Device Incidents in the MAUDE Database , 2004 .

[13]  E. Rygh,et al.  Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Nephrology.

[14]  S. Giles.  Transformations , 2004, Social work in health care.

[15]  N. Godbold,et al.  Listening to bodies and watching machines: Developing health information skills, tools and services for people living with chronic kidney disease , 2013 .

[16]  P Snelling,et al.  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  R. Fluck,et al.  Nephrologists’ perspectives on dialysis treatment: results of an international survey , 2014, BMC Nephrology.

[18]  J. Díaz-Buxó,et al.  Home Hemodialysis and Remote Monitoring: Current Technology, Requirements and Capabilities , 2004, Blood Purification.

[19]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Grypdonck.  Qualitative Health Research in the Era of Evidence-Based Practice , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[21]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[22]  Piotr Spiewanowski,et al.  The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting--a multicentre study. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[23]  N. Polaschek.  'Doing dialysis at home': client attitudes towards renal therapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[24]  Claude Ghaoui,et al.  Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[25]  Jian-ping Liu,et al.  [Qualitative research and evidence-based medicine]. , 2008, Zhongguo Zhong xi yi jie he za zhi Zhongguo Zhongxiyi jiehe zazhi = Chinese journal of integrated traditional and Western medicine.

[26]  C. Gudex,et al.  Patients' views regarding choice of dialysis modality. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[27]  M. Marshall,et al.  Exsanguination of a home hemodialysis patient as a result of misconnected blood-lines during the wash back procedure: A case report , 2012, BMC Nephrology.