Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis

Significance The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) system has been used to generate targeted gene editing in plants. However, it is not known whether CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in plants occur in somatic cells only or whether some or all of the modifications can enter the germ line to become heritable. Through systematic and multigenerational analysis, this study demonstrates that although the majority of gene modifications detected in the first generation CRISPR/Cas transgenic Arabidopsis plants were somatic mutations only, heritable mutations could be found in subsequent generations. In addition, deep sequencing of CRISPR/Cas-modified Arabidopsis genomes did not detect any off-targets. The work demonstrates that the CRISPR/Cas method can effectively create specific gene modifications in planta that are stably transmitted through the germ line to future generations. The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) system has emerged as a powerful tool for targeted gene editing in many organisms, including plants. However, all of the reported studies in plants focused on either transient systems or the first generation after the CRISPR/Cas system was stably transformed into plants. In this study we examined several plant generations with seven genes at 12 different target sites to determine the patterns, efficiency, specificity, and heritability of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene mutations or corrections in Arabidopsis. The proportion of plants bearing any mutations (chimeric, heterozygous, biallelic, or homozygous) was 71.2% at T1, 58.3% at T2, and 79.4% at T3 generations. CRISPR/Cas-induced mutations were predominantly 1 bp insertion and short deletions. Gene modifications detected in T1 plants occurred mostly in somatic cells, and consequently there were no T1 plants that were homozygous for a gene modification event. In contrast, ∼22% of T2 plants were found to be homozygous for a modified gene. All homozygotes were stable to the next generation, without any new modifications at the target sites. There was no indication of any off-target mutations by examining the target sites and sequences highly homologous to the target sites and by in-depth whole-genome sequencing. Together our results show that the CRISPR/Cas system is a useful tool for generating versatile and heritable modifications specifically at target genes in plants.

[1]  Peter Krawitz,et al.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish , 2013, Development.

[2]  Jian‐Kang Zhu,et al.  Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. , 2013, Molecular plant.

[3]  D. Voytas,et al.  Targeted Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana Using Engineered TAL Effector Nucleases , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[4]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Cell Research.

[5]  Bing Yang,et al.  Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Botao Zhang,et al.  Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system , 2013, Cell Research.

[8]  George M. Church,et al.  Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Jun Li,et al.  Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Reporter and Conditional Alleles by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[12]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[15]  D. Voytas,et al.  Increasing frequencies of site-specific mutagenesis and gene targeting in Arabidopsis by manipulating DNA repair pathways , 2013, Genome research.

[16]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[17]  M. Spalding,et al.  High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Claudio Mussolino,et al.  A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  David R. Liu,et al.  Revealing Off-Target Cleavage Specificities of Zinc Finger Nucleases by In Vitro Selection , 2011, Nature Methods.

[20]  Feng Zhang,et al.  High frequency targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using zinc finger nucleases , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Yuriko Osakabe,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  P. Hooykaas,et al.  ZFN-induced mutagenesis and gene-targeting in Arabidopsis through Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip transformation. , 2009, Plant biotechnology journal.

[23]  Ronnie J Winfrey,et al.  High frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc finger nucleases , 2009, Nature.

[24]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[25]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Bevan,et al.  GUS fusions: beta‐glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. , 1987, The EMBO journal.