Effects of timing and duration of test period and diet type on intake and feed efficiency of Charolais-sired cattle.

Objectives of this experiment were to: 1) determine appropriate test length, timing, and repeatability of DMI, ADG, and efficiency over different biological time points; 2) determine the efficacy of using decoupled performance and intake data to generate accurate feed efficiency measures; and 3) determine the relationship between forage-and grain-feed efficiency measures. Over 2 yr, Charolais crossbred heifers ( = 308) and steers ( = 320) were fed for two 70 d periods and DMI, ADG, and 12th rib fat thickness were recorded. Steers were fed grain-based diets during the growing and finishing periods to determine the effects of test period and timing on DMI and feed efficiency. Heifers were fed forage during the growing period and grain during the finishing period to test the effect of diet type on measures of DMI and feed efficiency. For each 70 d test period, individual DMI was recorded using the GrowSafe (Airdrie, AB) system. Residual feed intake (RFI) was calculated for each test period. Total feeding period ADG (FP_ADG) was calculated for steers by regressing all weights taken from feedlot arrival to final BW, which was calculated by dividing HCW by a standard dressing percentage (63%). Dry matter intake and RFI were correlated (r 0.56; < 0.01, and 0.63; < 0.01, respectively) for the growing and finishing periods of grain-fed steers. Average daily gain was not repeatable ( = 0.11; 0.06) across both test periods for steers. However, growing and finishing ADG were correlated ( = 0.58; < 0.01, and = 0.69; < 0.01, respectively) to FP_ADG. To assess the potential of shortening the intake test, DMI was analyzed in 7 d increments for grain-fed steers during the growing and finishing periods. Regardless of test length, from 7 to 70 d, DMI was strongly correlated ( ≥ 0.87; < 0.01) to total DMI during the growing period. Heifer forage DMI was correlated ( = 0.58; < 0.01) to grain DMI; subsequently, forage and grain RFI were moderately correlated ( = 0.40; < 0.01). This study suggests that DMI is repeatable across varying stages of maturity in cattle, and accurate feed efficiency measures can be obtained in either the growing or finishing period. The relationship of forage and grain DMI and efficiency in heifers suggests that measures of DMI and feed efficiency in heifers are relevant, regardless of diet fed. Intake evaluation periods can be shortened with minimal effects on the accuracy of predicting individual animal DMI.

[1]  Division on Earth,et al.  Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle , 2016 .

[2]  D. Mertens Regulation of Forage Intake , 2015 .

[3]  K. Retallick Genetic variance and covariance compenents for feed intake, average daily gain, and postweaning gain and indices to improve feed efficiency in growing beef cattle , 2015 .

[4]  T. E. Black,et al.  Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and temperament assessed in growing beef heifers and subsequently as 3-year-old, lactating beef cows. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[5]  V. Baron,et al.  Evidence of residual feed intake reranking in crossbred replacement heifers. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[6]  S. Moore,et al.  Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[7]  D H Crews,et al.  Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Herd,et al.  Residual feed intake in beef cattle , 2008 .

[9]  D H Crews,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[10]  Tim A. McAllister,et al.  Relationships between bunk attendance, intake and performance of steers and heifers on varying feeding regimes , 2002 .

[11]  L. L. Berger,et al.  Critical Control Points for Profitability in the Cow-Calf Enterprise , 2001 .

[12]  J. Archer,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[13]  J. Archer,et al.  Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review , 1999 .

[14]  J. Archer,et al.  Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[15]  A. Illius,et al.  Metabolic constraints on voluntary intake in ruminants. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[16]  Z. Johnson,et al.  Effects of 84-, 112- and 140-day postweaning feedlot performance tests for beef bulls. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[17]  Robert M. Koch,et al.  Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle , 1963 .