Aging and cognitive vigilance: effects of spatial uncertainty and event rate.

Age-related differences in cognitive vigilance were examined in a task requiring identification of a target (a lowercase letter) presented at three levels of spatial uncertainty (low, moderate, and high) and in the context of a low or high event rate. Thirty-six young (18-24 years) and 36 older (60-74 years) adults participated in 30-min vigilance sessions. Increased spatial uncertainty decreased target detection rate and d' to a greater extent in older adults than in young adults. No age differences were obtained for the low-spatial-uncertainty condition. The vigilance decrement--the decline in detection rate over time--was magnified when event rate was high and when spatial uncertainty was high. The results suggest that cognitive vigilance is age sensitive when demands on visual attention capacity are increased by high event rate or spatial uncertainty.

[1]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Psychophysics of Vigilance , 1980 .

[2]  S Corkin,et al.  Effectiveness of attentional cueing in older and younger adults. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[3]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  The influence of age on consistent and varied semantic-category search performance. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[4]  H A Taub,et al.  Effects of signal and stimulus rates on vigilance performance. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  J. Haxby,et al.  Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Staniŝa Miloŝević,et al.  Effect of time and space uncertainty on a vigilance task , 1974 .

[7]  Michel Loeb,et al.  Variation in performance on auditory and visual monitoring tasks as a function of signal and stimulus frequencies , 1968 .

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Skill development in vigilance: effects of event rate and age. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[10]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[11]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability. , 1990 .

[13]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Sensory and Cognitive Vigilance: Effects of Age on Performance and Subjective Workload , 1993 .

[14]  J V Haxby,et al.  Visuospatial attention in dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[17]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Vigilance: Taxonomy And Utility , 1987 .

[18]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Control and Automatic Processing During Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance , 1981 .

[19]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[20]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  P. Nestor,et al.  Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults. , 1989, Psychology and Aging.