Performance Evaluation of Five Detection Tests for Avian Influenza Antigen with Various Avian Samples

Abstract In this paper, we report on the evaluation of five influenza antigen detection tests by avian influenza H5N1 virus–positive swab samples to estimate their diagnostic sensitivity. The tests included two chromatographic immunoassays, an H5 avian influenza–specific antigen detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), an influenza A antigen detection ELISA, and an H5 rapid immunoblot assay. The results showed that the overall sensitivities of these tests ranged from 36.3% to 51.4% (95% confidence interval ranging from 31.0% to 57.0%), which were comparable to Directigen™ Flu A antigen detection tests but substantially lower than genome detection methods. Diagnostic sensitivity performance is a function of the concentration of antigens in samples and the analytical sensitivity of the individual test. The test sensitivities were significantly higher for sick and dead birds by cloacal, tracheal, or tissue swabs than for fecal swabs from apparently healthy birds, and these tests would not be suitable for surveillance testing of clinically healthy birds. Furthermore, the sensitivity for testing tracheal and cloacal swabs from waterfowl and wild birds was not as good as for chickens. This was most likely to be associated with variation in virus titers between specimens from different bird species. However, the tests showed good sensitivities for testing brain swabs from clinically affected waterfowl species. The results indicate that these antigen detection tests could be used for preliminary investigations of H5N1 outbreaks as a low-cost, simple flock test in sick and dead birds for the rapid detection of H5N1 infection. However, the relatively low sensitivity of the tests as individual bird tests means that they should be used on optimal clinical specimens from diseased birds, testing birds on a flock basis, or testing samples as close to the onset of disease as possible before viral titers diminish. They should be followed up by confirmatory tests, such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or viral culture, wherever possible but could assist in facilitating rapid investigations and control interventions.

[1]  A. Meijer Importance of rapid testing to combat the global threat of bird flu , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[2]  M. Pantin-Jackwood,et al.  Pathogenicity of avian influenza viruses in poultry. , 2006, Developments in biologicals.

[3]  Raymond J Kim,et al.  Diagnostic testing. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  C. Cardona,et al.  Commercial Immunoassay Kits for the Detection of Influenza Virus Type A: Evaluation of Their Use with Poultry , 2005, Avian diseases.

[5]  Y. Guan,et al.  Are Ducks Contributing to the Endemicity of Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus in Asia? , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[6]  T. Ellis,et al.  Evaluation of vaccination to support control of H5N1 avian influenza in Hong Kong , 2005 .

[7]  David E. Swayne,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Avian Influenza Viruses, Including Highly Pathogenic H5N1, from Poultry in Live Bird Markets in Hanoi, Vietnam, in 2001 , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[8]  T. Tumpey,et al.  Characterization of Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Avian Influenza A Viruses Isolated from South Korea , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[9]  T. Scott,et al.  An update on avian influenza. , 2005 .

[10]  R Jackson,et al.  Epidemiology of H 5 N 1 Avian Influenza in Asia and Implications for Regional Control , 2005 .

[11]  Y. Guan,et al.  Investigation of outbreaks of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in waterfowl and wild birds in Hong Kong in late 2002 , 2004, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[12]  G. Cattoli,et al.  Comparison of three rapid detection systems for type A influenza virus on tracheal swabs of experimentally and naturally infected birds , 2004, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[13]  Y. Guan,et al.  Vaccination of chickens against H5N1 avian influenza in the face of an outbreak interrupts virus transmission , 2004, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[14]  Y Li,et al.  The evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in ducks in southern China. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Y. Guan,et al.  Reemerging H5N1 Influenza Viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 Are Highly Pathogenic to Ducks , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[16]  J. Peiris,et al.  Re-emergence of fatal human influenza A subtype H5N1 disease , 2004, The Lancet.

[17]  Y. Guan,et al.  An Update on Avian Influenza in Hong Kong 2002 , 2003, Avian diseases.

[18]  D. Swayne,et al.  Comparative Susceptibility of Selected Avian and Mammalian Species to a Hong Kong–Origin H5N1 High-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus , 2003, Avian diseases.

[19]  K. Lohman,et al.  Development of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Type A Influenza Virus and the Avian H5 and H7 Hemagglutinin Subtypes , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[20]  Y. Guan,et al.  Emergence of multiple genotypes of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Hong Kong SAR , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  T. Tumpey,et al.  Characterization of a Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Avian Influenza A Virus Isolated from Duck Meat , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[22]  R. Collins,et al.  Detection of highly pathogenic and low pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5 (Eurasian lineage) using NASBA. , 2002, Journal of virological methods.

[23]  Y. Guan,et al.  H5N1 influenza viruses isolated from geese in Southeastern China: evidence for genetic reassortment and interspecies transmission to ducks. , 2002, Virology.

[24]  Yi Guan,et al.  Characterization of H5N1 Influenza Viruses That Continue To Circulate in Geese in Southeastern China , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[25]  D. Swayne,et al.  Pathogenicity of a Hong Kong–Origin H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus for Emus, Geese, Ducks, and Pigeons , 2002, Avian diseases.

[26]  D. Swayne,et al.  Pathobiology of A/Chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) Avian Influenza Virus in Seven Gallinaceous Species , 2001, Veterinary pathology.

[27]  Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus,et al.  Detection of Influenza A Viruses from Different Species by PCR Amplification of Conserved Sequences in the Matrix Gene , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[28]  D. Suarez,et al.  Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza , 2015, Radiology of Infectious Diseases: Volume 1.

[29]  Y. Guan,et al.  Characterization of avian H5N1 influenza viruses from poultry in Hong Kong. , 1998, Virology.

[30]  David E. Swayne,et al.  Comparisons of Highly Virulent H5N1 Influenza A Viruses Isolated from Humans and Chickens from Hong Kong , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[31]  R. Webster,et al.  Human influenza A H5N1 virus related to a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus , 1998, The Lancet.

[32]  N. Cox,et al.  Characterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1) virus isolated from a child with a fatal respiratory illness. , 1998, Science.

[33]  R. Webster,et al.  Application of Directigen FLU-A for the detection of influenza A virus in human and nonhuman specimens , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[34]  R. Manvell,et al.  Experimental assessment of the pathogenicity of eight avian influenza A viruses of H5 subtype for chickens, turkeys, ducks and quail. , 1986, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[35]  W. J. Bean,et al.  Intestinal influenza: Replication and characterization of influenza viruses in ducks , 1978, Virology.