Strategic and Tactical Limits of Comparison Studies

A comparison study is an experiment whose primary purpose is to compare directly (regardless of experimental design) at least two different procedures for changing behavior or two or more components of such a procedure. This paper argues that, in spite of their popularity, such studies typically lead to inappropriate inferences with poor generality based on improper evidence gathered in support of the wrong question, thus wasting the limited experimental resources. The discussion considers problems concerning the functions of comparison studies, the nature of the comparisons that are attempted, the generality of their findings, and the limited role that they can play in technological research.

[1]  M D Mosk,et al.  Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating the effects of social interventions , 1981 .

[4]  A parametric analysis of the relationship between food quantity and rumination. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  Daniel E. Hursh Personalized systems of instruction: What do the data indicate? , 1976 .

[6]  B. L. Hopkins Comments on the future of applied behavior analysis. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  Robert S. Ruskin,et al.  Behavioral Instruction: An Evaluative Review. , 1977 .

[8]  F. Keller "Good-bye, teacher...". , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Sidman Tactics of Scientific Research , 1960 .

[11]  J. Rast,et al.  Effects of nutritional and mechanical properties of food on ruminative behavior. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  H. Pennypacker,et al.  Pure versus Quasi-Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[13]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[14]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  An alternating treatment comparison of oral and total communications training programs with echolalic autistic children. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  J. Rast,et al.  The relation of food quantity to rumination behavior. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  H. Pennypacker,et al.  Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research , 1980 .

[17]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-Case Research Designs , 1982 .

[18]  A. Repp,et al.  A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.