An Optimal Flow Assignment Framework for Heterogeneous Network Access

We consider a scenario where devices with multiple networking capabilities access networks with heterogeneous characteristics. In such a setting, we address the problem of efficient utilization of multiple access networks (wireless and/or wireline) by devices via optimal assignment of traffic flows with given utilities to different networks. We develop and analyze a device middleware functionality that monitors network characteristics and employs a Markov Decision Process (MDP) based control scheme that in conjunction with stochastic characterization of the available bit rate and delay of the networks generates an optimal policy for allocation of flows to different networks. The optimal policy maximizes, under available bit rate and delay constraints on the access networks, a discounted reward which is a function of the flow utilities. The flow assignment policy is periodically updated and is consulted by the flows to dynamically perform network selection during their lifetimes. We perform measurement tests to collect traces of available bit rate and delay characteristics on Ethernet and WLAN networks on a work day in a corporate work environment. We implement our flow assignment framework in ns-2 and simulate the system performance for a set of elastic video-like flows using the collected traces. We demonstrate that the MDP based flow assignment policy leads to significant enhancement in the QoS provisioning (lower packet delays and packet loss rates) for the flows, as compared to policies which do not perform dynamic flow assignment but statically allocate flows to different networks using heuristics like average available bit rate on the networks.

[1]  Eitan Altman,et al.  The Case for Non-Cooperative Multihoming of Users to Access Points in IEEE 802.11 WLANs , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[2]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[3]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  A globally stable adaptive congestion control scheme for Internet-style networks with delay , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  Kavé Salamatian,et al.  Hidden Markov modeling for network communication channels , 2001, SIGMETRICS '01.

[5]  Pablo Vidales,et al.  The IMS service platform: a solution for next-generation network operators to be more than bit pipes , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Cooperation and decision-making in a wireless multi-provider setting , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[7]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  Flow Scheduling for End-Host Multihoming , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  A Markov-Based Channel Model Algorithm for Wireless Networks , 2001, MSWIM '01.

[9]  Tzi-cker Chiueh,et al.  Experiences in building a multihoming load balancing system , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[10]  Anders Furuskar,et al.  Multiservice allocation for multiaccess wireless systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Marion Kee,et al.  Analysis , 2004, Machine Translation.

[12]  Gary Froyland,et al.  Chapter 12 Extracting Dynamical Behavior via Markov Models , 2001 .

[13]  T. Basar,et al.  Global stability analysis of an end-to-end congestion control scheme for general topology networks with delay , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[14]  J. W. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Boekbespreking van D.P. Bertsekas (ed.), Dynamic programming and optimal control - volume 2 , 1999 .

[15]  Bernd Girod,et al.  Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  A utility-based congestion control scheme for Internet-style networks with delay , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[17]  Frank Stajano,et al.  Autonomic system for mobility support in 4G networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  A game theoretic framework for bandwidth allocation and pricing in broadband networks , 2000, TNET.

[19]  Kameswari Chebrolu,et al.  Communication using multiple wireless interfaces , 2002, 2002 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Record. WCNC 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8609).

[20]  Gábor Fodor,et al.  Simulative analysis of access selection algorithms for multi-access networks , 2006, 2006 International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks(WoWMoM'06).

[21]  Gábor Fodor,et al.  On Access Selection Techniques in Always Best Connected Networks , 2004 .